Fostering the Adolescent: Trainer\u27s Manual

Fostering the Adolescent is designed as a curriculum to meet the needs of foster parents who have (or soon will have) adolescent foster children in their homes. Trainers will get to know the parents in their groups and use some flexibility in meeting the needs of those parents. The commitment made by the Foster Parent Training Project is one of providing parents with materials and training that will be helpful to them in fostering their adolescents. The curriculum is designed in ten separate segments, and those segments or sessions may be delivered in any sequence helpful to both the parents and the trainer. Sessions One, Two, and Three should first be presented in that order, and the other sessions may be presented in any order the trainer desires. Some groups may meet for a compressed week-end session while others may opt to meet weekly for anywhere from one to ten different meetings. Regardless of the training format utilized, the trainer will need to know the parents and his or her own needs and schedule the sequence accordingly

2013 Literary Review (no. 26)

https://poetcommons.whittier.edu/greenleafreview/1002/thumbnail.jp

That\u27s What Families Do : Rewards and Challenges of Informal Kinship Care

Informal kinship caregivers take on the responsibility of raising a relative\u27s children in situations where those children cannot remain with their parents and are not in the custody of child welfare. The phenomenon is increasing; however it is difficult to obtain information from these families because of the difficulty locating them. As a result, there is limited research on this specific group of kinship care families. The purpose of this study was exploratory, using qualitative methods to gather information from informal kinship caregivers about their experiences caring for a relative\u27s children, with a focus on the rewards and challenges within those experiences. A second purpose was to enable participants to tell their stories so that information could be used by practitioners and policymakers. The 14 participants in this study described a path to informal kinship care that began with precipitating events that resulted in the children’s not being able to live with their parents, followed by the decision to provide care, and then the quest to obtain legal custody of them. The caregivers next began a journey through the experiences of being informal kinship caregivers, which included both rewards and challenges. Four themes emerged to characterize those rewards and challenges: experiences with family, experiences with systems, financial experiences, and emotional experiences. Participants provided recommendations for both practitioners and policymakers, which included requests for more recognition and respect as well as more emotional, social, legal, and financial support. Despite all the difficulties, none of the participants regretted their decision to care for their relative\u27s children

A Participatory Action Research (PAR) into how the language and vocabulary of diabetes facilitates peoples’ experience of living with diabetes: the Language in Diabetes Study (LIDAS)

There are 4.2 million people diagnosed with diabetes in the UK. It has been established that diabetes causes psychological strain for people with diabetes (PWD) both in increased mental health diagnoses and specific issues under the heading “diabetes distress” (DD). The language and vocabulary of diabetes has been implicated in DD as it may comprise of a restricted code/dialect with negative connotations. Suggestions have also been made to alter speech forms to avoid this utilising alternative vocabulary. A further question however, is why this phenomenon persists at all? Aims: The purpose of the Language in Diabetes Action Study (LIDAS) was to explore how the language and vocabulary of diabetes facilitates peoples’ experience of living with diabetes. As a long-term condition diabetes has a high burden of selfmanagement practices by the patient. Language and vocabulary is seen as a mediating factor in PWD understanding the meaning and purpose of those practices and how they mitigate risks for future complications and promote health. A phenomenological and existential underpinning understands that language conveys meaning but also shapes meaning and this will influence a PWD way of being with diabetes. A thorough review of the literature comprises scientific diabetes-related literature, health psychology literature, existential and post-modernist literature and comparison with language and its significance in other long-term conditions. Method: The method deployed was Participatory Action Research by forming a Cooperative Enquiry group of Co-researchers that participated through cycles of dialogue and reflection to provide a “slice through” rather than a “snapshot” of their lifeworld experience with diabetes. This was in order to move closer to research with PWD as opposed to on PWD. Challenges in study realisation were explored and how technology in terms of video conferencing and transcription assisted. Nine participants contributed in the PAR group to varying degrees, of which a core group of 4 committed Co-researchers provided substantiate involvement over eight months of cycles of reflection and dialogue on a weekly or fortnightly basis by consensus. Additionally, work peers from Diabetes UK volunteered involvement. Co-researchers and team peers provided 27 hours of transcribed material, 9000 words of dialectic material from the DUK Forum, with a total number of participatory voices totalling 40 respondents. The gender of participants, including those from the DUK Forum was quite even (47% male, 53% female). However, female participants contributed more cycles of dialogue and reflection over time. The data then comprises closer to 75% of the transcribed data set. Participants’ age ranged from 21 to 50 with a mean calculated age of 32. A hermeneutic developed for Co-researchers through cycles as they became more invested and involved; this was augmented using interpretive analysis in the manner of Foucauldian genealogy considering bio-power, regimes of truth and Heidegger’s notion of entanglement explicated in his discussion in the question concerning technology. In addition to Co-researchers reflections each dialogue was transcribed and analysed for themes and made available to Co-researchers for further comment, so each cycle refined and reworked the thematic analysis. Findings and Discussion: The LIDAS group findings strongly support the phenomenon of a restricted code/dialect in diabetes and the significance in the aetiology of DD. Furthermore, the findings explore the underlying beliefs implicated and the mechanisms that may open understanding to the root of this phenomenon and the route by which it sustains itself. This abstract, idealistic notion is a discourse that concerns an unreflected belief that a PWD attitude and personality is central to management, termed Capacity to Control. In this way a PWD is viewed as having to become highly motivated, disciplined, ascetic and compliant to a restricted regimen, subjected to measurement and assessment of their HbA1c targets. This is as opposed to attributing diabetes management to Skills, Knowledge and Tools that are contextually optimised for the individual PWD and contribute to their pursuit of lifeworld goals. This is epitomised in the exemplars of Structured Patient Education, Pump Therapy and Flash Glucose Monitoring. The discussion explores how this entangled discourse leads to an illusion of choice, an abstract rather than humanistic view of PWD, burnout and DD, moralism and stigma. The study further notes that tensions over targets, resources and cost produce consumerist healthcare and a notion of a patient’s responsibility to be compliant and that these pressures are the root of Capacity to Control. Synthesis of Findings: This section continues by drawing together the themes revealed in the findings with the current literature and the concepts of Heidegger and Foucault. It also explicates the tensions and forces at play for PWD and HCP, drawing attention to Healthcare for long term conditions viewed in the light of consumerism and moralism. The involvement of counselling psychology and psychotherapy is explored and problems that arise in how referrals are made and what psychological care means for diabetes. Conclusion: The study concludes by assessing study limitations and evaluating PAR as a means of generating data and what this means for the findings. It goes on to explore the gender bias and its possible significance for understanding the findings. An exploration of the possible uses of the findings in relation to HCP training and reflective practice, counselling and psychotherapy services for PWD, patient empowerment for PWD and possible future purposes for PAR in health and psychology. It also suggests possibilities for further research: the potential for using the LIDAS study themes to generate survey questions and establish the extent of applicability with wider participation or to address the gender bias. It also assess the possibility of developing LIDAS adapted patient education for clinical trial compared with current patient education

Spare the Rod, the Time-Out, and Every Other Kind of Childhood Punishment Too: Why Parents Ought Not to Punish Their Children

It is a default rule of behaviour to avoid intentionally causing distress to others, which is why parental punishment of children requires justification. I consider how various theories that have been offered as justification for state criminal punishment might apply in the case of parental punishment of children. I argue that none of those theories is successful, usually largely on empirical grounds. While retributivism is unsuccessful in justifying parental punishment of children, it nevertheless gets some significant things right: the importance of censure, and the appropriateness of wrongdoers feeling bad. However, the correct kind of "feeling bad" is guilt for one's wrongdoing and sympathy for one's victim (if there is one), not the self-oriented distress that is induced by a punishment. As a matter of empirical fact, feelings of guilt and sympathy tend to motivate human beings to make amends, which is why it's appropriate for parents to encourage their children to have those feelings (or at least not interfere with them). I argue that punishing children is not an effective way to induce feelings of guilt and sympathy (indeed, punishment tends to interfere with them). Parents should use non-punitive discipline that encourages children to recognize their own wrongdoing as such, to feel sympathy for anyone they may have harmed, and they should help children to make amends. Parents ought not to punish their children.Doctor of Philosoph

2011 Literary Review (no. 24)

https://poetcommons.whittier.edu/greenleafreview/1008/thumbnail.jp