4 research outputs found

    Contents

    Get PDF

    Hybrid Multi-layered GMDH-type Neural Network Using Principal Component Regression Analysis and its Application to Medical Image Diagnosis of Liver Cancer

    Get PDF
    AbstractIn this study, a hybrid multi-layered Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH)-type neural network algorithm using principal component-regression analysis is proposed and applied to the computer aided image diagnosis (CAD) of liver cancer. In the GMDH-type neural network, a heuristic self-organization method that is a type of evolutionary computation, is used to organize the neural network architecture. In this revised GMDH-type neural network, the optimum neural network architecture is automatically organized from three types of neural network architectures, such as the sigmoid function neural network, the radial basis function (RBF) network and the polynomial neural network architecture, by the heuristic self-organization method. Furthermore, the structural parameters such as the number of layers, the number of neurons in hidden layers and useful input variables, are automatically determined using the heuristic self-organization method. In the revised GMDH-type neural network proposed in this paper, the principal component-regression analysis is used to protect multi-colinearity which has occurred in the learning calculations of neurons, and accurate and stable prediction values are obtained. This new algorithm is applied to the medical image diagnosis of liver cancer. In this application, two types of neural network architectures fitting the complexity of the multi-detector row CT (MDCT) medical images, are automatically organized using the revised GMDH-type neural network algorithm The first neural network recognizes and extracts the liver regions from the MDCT images of the liver, and the second neural network recognizes and extracts the liver cancer regions. These results are compared with the conventional sigmoid function neural network trained using the back propagation method, and this GMDH-type neural network algorithm is shown to be useful for CAD of liver cancer

    Combined forecast model involving wavelet-group methods of data handling for drought forecasting

    Get PDF
    Vigorous efforts to improve the effectiveness of drought forecasting models has yet to yield accurate result. The situation gives room on the use of robust forecasting methods that could effectively improve existing methods. The complex nature of time series data does not enable one single method that is suitable in all situations. Thus, a combined model that will provide a better result is then proposed. This study introduces a wavelet and group methods of data handling (GMDH) by integrating discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and GMDH with transfer functions such as sigmoid and radial basis function (RBF) to form three wavelet-GMDH models known as modified W-GMDH (MW-GMDH), sigmoid W-GMDH (SW-GMDH) and RBF W-GMDH. To assess the effectiveness of this approach, these models were applied to rainfall data at four study stations namely Arau and Kuala Krai in Malaysia as well as Badeggi and Duku-Lade in Nigeria. These data were transformed into four Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) known as SPI3, SPI6, SPI9 and SPI12. The result shows that the integration of DWT improved the performance of the conventional GMDH model. The combination of these models further improved the performance of each model. The proposed model provides efficient, simple, and reliable accuracy when compared with other models. The incorporation of wavelet to the study results in improving performance for all four stations with the Combined W-GMDH (CW-GMDH) and Combined Regression W-GMDH (CRW-GMDH) models. The results show that Duku-Lade station produced the lowest value of 0.0239 and 0.0211 for RMSE and MAE and highest value of 0.9858 for R respectively. In addition, CRW-GMDH model produce the lowest value of 0.0168 and 0.0117, and the highest value of 0.9870 for RMSE MAE, and R respectively. On the percentage improvement, Duku-Lade station shows improvement over other models with the reductions in RMSE and MAE by 42.3% and 80.3% respectively. This indicates that the model is most suitable for the drought forecasting in this station. The results of the comparison among the four stations indicate that the CW-GMDH and CRW-GMDH models are more accurate and perform better than MW-GMDH, SW-GMDH and RBFW-GMDH models. However, the overall performance of the CRW-GMDH model outweigh that of the CW-GMDH model. In conclusion, CRW-GMDH model performs better than other models for drought forecasting and capable of providing a promising alternative to drought forecasting technique
    corecore