Fairness in Image Search: A Study of Occupational Stereotyping in Image Retrieval and its Debiasing

Multi-modal search engines have experienced significant growth and widespread use in recent years, making them the second most common internet use. While search engine systems offer a range of services, the image search field has recently become a focal point in the information retrieval community, as the adage goes, "a picture is worth a thousand words". Although popular search engines like Google excel at image search accuracy and agility, there is an ongoing debate over whether their search results can be biased in terms of gender, language, demographics, socio-cultural aspects, and stereotypes. This potential for bias can have a significant impact on individuals' perceptions and influence their perspectives. In this paper, we present our study on bias and fairness in web search, with a focus on keyword-based image search. We first discuss several kinds of biases that exist in search systems and why it is important to mitigate them. We narrow down our study to assessing and mitigating occupational stereotypes in image search, which is a prevalent fairness issue in image retrieval. For the assessment of stereotypes, we take gender as an indicator. We explore various open-source and proprietary APIs for gender identification from images. With these, we examine the extent of gender bias in top-tanked image search results obtained for several occupational keywords. To mitigate the bias, we then propose a fairness-aware re-ranking algorithm that optimizes (a) relevance of the search result with the keyword and (b) fairness w.r.t genders identified. We experiment on 100 top-ranked images obtained for 10 occupational keywords and consider random re-ranking and re-ranking based on relevance as baselines. Our experimental results show that the fairness-aware re-ranking algorithm produces rankings with better fairness scores and competitive relevance scores than the baselines.Comment: 20 Pages, Work uses Proprietary Search Systems from the year 202

A survey of detection and mitigation for fake images on social media platforms

Recently, the spread of fake images on social media platforms has become a significant concern for individuals, organizations, and governments. These images are often created using sophisticated techniques to spread misinformation, influence public opinion, and threaten national security. This paper begins by defining fake images and their potential impact on society, including the spread of misinformation and the erosion of trust in digital media. This paper also examines the different types of fake images and their challenges for detection. We then review the recent approaches proposed for detecting fake images, including digital forensics, machine learning, and deep learning. These approaches are evaluated in terms of their strengths and limitations, highlighting the need for further research. This paper also highlights the need for multimodal approaches that combine multiple sources of information, such as text, images, and videos. Furthermore, we present an overview of existing datasets, evaluation metrics, and benchmarking tools for fake image detection. This paper concludes by discussing future directions for fake image detection research, such as developing more robust and explainable methods, cross-modal fake detection, and the integration of social context. It also emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary research that combines computer science, digital forensics, and cognitive psychology experts to tackle the complex problem of fake images. This survey paper will be a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on fake image detection on social media platforms.peer-reviewe

Information Retrieval Evaluation Measures Based on Preference Graphs

Offline evaluation for web search has used mostly graded judgments to evaluate the performance of information retrieval systems. While graded judgments suffer several known problems, preference judgments simply judge one item over another, which avoids the problem of complex definition of relevance scores. Previous research about evaluation measures for preference judgments focuses on translating preferences into relevance scores applied in the traditional evaluation measures, or weighting and counting the number of agreements between actual ranking from users’ preferences and ideal ranking generated by systems. However, these measures lack clear theoretical foundations and their values have no obvious interpretation. On the other hand, although preference judgments for general web search have been studied extensively, there is limited research on investigating preference judgments application for web image search. This thesis addresses exactly these questions, which proposes a preference-based evaluation measure to compute the maximum similarity between an actual ranking from users’ preferences and an ideal ranking generated by systems. Specifically, this measure constructs a directed multigraph and computes the ordering of vertices, which we call the ideal ranking, that has maximum similarity to actual ranking calculated by the rank similarity measure. This measure is able to take any arbitrary collection of preferences that might include the property of conflicts, redundancies, incompleteness, and diverse type results (documents or images). Our results show that Greedy PGC matches or exceeds the performance of evaluation measures proposed in previous research

Geographic information extraction from texts

A large volume of unstructured texts, containing valuable geographic information, is available online. This information – provided implicitly or explicitly – is useful not only for scientific studies (e.g., spatial humanities) but also for many practical applications (e.g., geographic information retrieval). Although large progress has been achieved in geographic information extraction from texts, there are still unsolved challenges and issues, ranging from methods, systems, and data, to applications and privacy. Therefore, this workshop will provide a timely opportunity to discuss the recent advances, new ideas, and concepts but also identify research gaps in geographic information extraction

Grid-based Evaluation Metrics for Web Image Search

Compared to general web search engines, web image search engines display results in a different way. In web image search, results are typically placed in a grid-based manner rather than a sequential result list. In this scenario, users can view results not only in a vertical direction but also in a horizontal direction. Moreover, pagination is usually not (explicitly) supported on image search search engine result pages (SERPs), and users can view results by scrolling down without having to click a “next page” button. These differences lead to different interaction mechanisms and user behavior patterns, which, in turn, create challenges to evaluation metrics that have originally been developed for general web search. While considerable effort has been invested in developing evaluation metrics for general web search, there has been relatively little effort to construct grid-based evaluation metrics. To inform the development of grid-based evaluation metrics for web image search, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of user behavior so as to uncover how users allocate their attention in a grid-based web image search result interface. We obtain three findings: (1) “Middle bias”: Confirming previous studies, we find that image results in the horizontal middle positions may receive more attention from users than those in the leftmost or rightmost positions. (2) “Slower decay”: Unlike web search, users' attention does not decrease monotonically or dramatically with the rank position in image search, especially within a row. (3) “Row skipping”: Users may ignore particular rows and directly jump to results at some distance. Motivated by these observations, we propose corresponding user behavior assumptions to capture users' search interaction processes and evaluate their search performance. We show how to derive new metrics from these assumptions and demonstrate that they can be adopted to revise traditional list-based metrics like Discounted Cumulative Gain (DCG) and Rank-Biased Precision (RBP). To show the effectiveness of the proposed grid-based metrics, we compare them against a number of list-based metrics in terms of their correlation with user satisfaction. Our experimental results show that the proposed grid-based evaluation metrics better reflect user satisfaction in web image search