6 research outputs found
Fuzzy multi criteria evaluation for performance of bus companies
A multi criteria decision making in ranking the bus companies using fuzzy rule is proposed. The proposed method uses the application of fuzzy sets and approximate reasoning in deciding the ranking of the performance of several bus companies. The proposed method introduces data normalization using similarity function which dampens extreme values that exist in the data. The use of the model is suitable in evaluating situation that involves subjectivity, vagueness and imprecise information. Experimental results are comparable to several previous methods
Hybrid subjective evaluation method using weighted subsethood - based (WSBA) rule generation algorithm
Fuzzy rules are important elements that should take into account in any fuzzy expert system.This paper proposes the framework of subjective performance evaluation using fuzzy technique for ranking the attributes of different types of datasets under a multi-criteria environment.The techniques such as fuzzy similarity function, fuzzy synthetic decision and satisfaction function have been adopted in these fuzzy evaluation methods.The framework is based on fuzzy multicriteria decision-making that consists of fuzzy rules. The use of fuzzy rules, which were extracted directly from input data through Weighted Subsethood-based (WSBA) Rule
Generation Algorithm.WSBA rule generation use the subsethood values to generate the weights which finally produced the fuzzy general rules.The rules generated through the data provided knowledge in developed fuzzy rule The fuzzy rules embedded in the framework of subjective evaluation method showed advantages in generalizing the evaluation of the performance achievement, where the evaluation process can be conducted consistently in
producing good evaluation results with the use of the membership set score.The results from the numerical examples are comparable to other fuzzy evaluation methods, even with the use of small rule size
Development of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis Method for Tender Cleaning Service Selection
This paper present a development of fuzzy set theory for tender cleaning
service selection. It aims to evaluate the tender based on several criterions and provide
the information to Tender Owner for selecting the top bidder. Tender evaluation is an
action to determine the potential bidder that provide the most benefits for the Tender
Board. The subjective assessment process is model using fuzzy number and linguistic
terms. The model is solved using algorithms which integrates the decision maker’s
decision for assessments on criteria weight with the performance ratings. Next, the
concept of degree optimality of each bidder respect to each main criterion is used to
convert weighted fuzzy performance matrix into a fuzzy singleton matrix. Top two
bidder will be awarded the tender based on the ranking of bidders, respective to the
evaluation of the corresponding fuzzy utilities. The application of this paper will not
only benefited Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP), but also benefited private
sector, oil and gas industry and government agency
Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Transit System Efficiency and Incentive-based Subsidy Allocation
Over the past several decades, contending with traffic congestion and air pollution has emerged as one of the imperative issues across the world. Development of a transit-oriented urban transport system has been realized by an increasing number of countries and administrations as one of the most effective strategies for mitigating congestion and pollution problems. Despite the rapid development of public transportation system, doubts regarding the efficiency of the system and financing sustainability have arisen. Significant amount of public resources have been invested into public transport; however complaints about low service quality and unreliable transit system performance have increasingly arisen from all walks of life. Evaluating transit operational efficiency from various levels and designing incentive-based mechanisms to allocate limited subsidies/resources have become one of the most imperative challenges faced by responsible authorities to sustain the public transport system development and improve its performance and levels of service.
After a comprehensive review of existing literature, this dissertation aims to develop a multi-dimensional framework composed of a series of robust multi-criteria evaluation models to assess the operational and financial performance of transit systems at various levels of application (i.e. region/city level, operator level, and route level). It further contributes to bridging the gap between transit efficiency evaluation and the subsequent subsidy allocation by developing a set of incentive-based resource allocation models taking various levels of operational and financial efficiencies into consideration. Case studies using real-world transit data will be performed to validate the performance and applicability of the proposed models
Project portfolio management : a model for improved decision making
The recent global financial crisis, regulatory and compliance requirements placed on organisations, and the need for scientific research in the project portfolio management discipline were factors that motivated this research. The interest and contribution to the body of knowledge in project portfolio management has been growing significantly in recent years, however, there still appears to be a misalignment between literature and practice. A particular area of concern is the decision-making, during the management of the portfolio, regarding which projects to accelerate, suspend, or terminate. A lack of determining the individual and cumulative contribution of projects to strategic objectives leads to poorly informed decisions that negate the positive effect that project portfolio management could have in an organisation. The focus of this research is, therefore, aimed at providing a mechanism to determine the individual and cumulative contribution of projects to strategic objectives so that the right decisions can be made regarding those projects.
This thesis begins with providing a context for project portfolio management by confirming a definition and providing a theoretical background through related theories. An investigation into the practice of project portfolio management then provides insight into the alignment between literature and practice and confirms the problem that needed to be addressed. A conceptual model provides a solution to the problem of determining the individual and cumulative contribution of projects to strategic objectives. The researcher illustrates how the model can be extended before verifying and validating the conceptual model.
Having the ability to determine the contributions of projects to strategic objectives affords decision makers the opportunity to conduct what-if scenarios, enabled through the use of dashboards as a visualization technique, in order to test the impact of their decisions before committing them. This ensures that the right decisions regarding the project portfolio are made and that the maximum benefit regarding the strategic objectives is achieved. This research provides the mechanism to enable better-informed decision- making regarding the project portfolio.ComputingD. Phil. (Computer science