2 research outputs found

    From samples to populations in retinex models

    Get PDF
    Some spatial color algorithms, such as Brownian Milano retinex (MI-retinex) and random spray retinex (RSR), are based on sampling. In Brownian MI-retinex, memoryless random walks (MRWs) explore the neighborhood of a pixel and are then used to compute its output. Considering the relative redundancy and inefficiency of MRW exploration, the algorithm RSR replaced the walks by samples of points (the sprays). Recent works point to the fact that a mapping from the sampling formulation to the probabilistic formulation of the corresponding sampling process can offer useful insights into the models, at the same time featuring intrinsically noise-free outputs. The paper continues the development of this concept and shows that the population-based versions of RSR and Brownian MI-retinex can be used to obtain analytical expressions for the outputs of some test images. The comparison of the two analytic expressions from RSR and from Brownian MI-retinex demonstrates not only that the two outputs are, in general, different but also that they depend, in a qualitatively different way, upon the features of the image

    Review and Comparison of Random Spray Retinex and of its variants STRESS and QBRIX

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we review and compare three spatial color algorithms of the Milano Retinex family: Random Spray Retinex (RSR) and its subsequent variants STRESS and QBRIX. These algorithms process the colors of any input image in line with the principles of the Retinex theory, introduced about 50 years ago by Land and McCann to explain how humans see colors. According to this theory, RSR, STRESS and QBRIX re-scale independently the color intensities of each pixel by a quantity, named local reference white, which depends on the spatial arrangement of the colors in the pixel surround. The output is a new color enhanced image that generally has a higher brightness and more visible details than the input one. RSR, STRESS and QBRIX adopt different models of spatial arrangement and implement different equations for the computation of the local reference white, so that they produce different enhanced images. We propose a comparative analysis of their performance based on numerical measures of the image brightness, details and dynamic range. In order to enable result repeatability and further comparisons, we use a set of images publicly available on the net
    corecore