478 research outputs found
From LCF to Isabelle/HOL
Interactive theorem provers have developed dramatically over the past four
decades, from primitive beginnings to today's powerful systems. Here, we focus
on Isabelle/HOL and its distinctive strengths. They include automatic proof
search, borrowing techniques from the world of first order theorem proving, but
also the automatic search for counterexamples. They include a highly readable
structured language of proofs and a unique interactive development environment
for editing live proof documents. Everything rests on the foundation conceived
by Robin Milner for Edinburgh LCF: a proof kernel, using abstract types to
ensure soundness and eliminate the need to store proofs. Compared with the
research prototypes of the 1970s, Isabelle is a practical and versatile tool.
It is used by system designers, mathematicians and many others
Isabelle/PIDE as Platform for Educational Tools
The Isabelle/PIDE platform addresses the question whether proof assistants of
the LCF family are suitable as technological basis for educational tools. The
traditionally strong logical foundations of systems like HOL, Coq, or Isabelle
have so far been counter-balanced by somewhat inaccessible interaction via the
TTY (or minor variations like the well-known Proof General / Emacs interface).
Thus the fundamental question of math education tools with fully-formal
background theories has often been answered negatively due to accidental
weaknesses of existing proof engines.
The idea of "PIDE" (which means "Prover IDE") is to integrate existing
provers like Isabelle into a larger environment, that facilitates access by
end-users and other tools. We use Scala to expose the proof engine in ML to the
JVM world, where many user-interfaces, editor frameworks, and educational tools
already exist. This shall ultimately lead to combined mathematical assistants,
where the logical engine is in the background, without obstructing the view on
applications of formal methods, formalized mathematics, and math education in
particular.Comment: In Proceedings THedu'11, arXiv:1202.453
Recursive Definitions of Monadic Functions
Using standard domain-theoretic fixed-points, we present an approach for
defining recursive functions that are formulated in monadic style. The method
works both in the simple option monad and the state-exception monad of
Isabelle/HOL's imperative programming extension, which results in a convenient
definition principle for imperative programs, which were previously hard to
define.
For such monadic functions, the recursion equation can always be derived
without preconditions, even if the function is partial. The construction is
easy to automate, and convenient induction principles can be derived
automatically.Comment: In Proceedings PAR 2010, arXiv:1012.455
Stateless HOL
We present a version of the HOL Light system that supports undoing
definitions in such a way that this does not compromise the soundness of the
logic. In our system the code that keeps track of the constants that have been
defined thus far has been moved out of the kernel. This means that the kernel
now is purely functional.
The changes to the system are small. All existing HOL Light developments can
be run by the stateless system with only minor changes.
The basic principle behind the system is not to name constants by strings,
but by pairs consisting of a string and a definition. This means that the data
structures for the terms are all merged into one big graph. OCaml - the
implementation language of the system - can use pointer equality to establish
equality of data structures fast. This allows the system to run at acceptable
speeds. Our system runs at about 85% of the speed of the stateful version of
HOL Light.Comment: In Proceedings TYPES 2009, arXiv:1103.311
ProofPeer - A Cloud-based Interactive Theorem Proving System
ProofPeer strives to be a system for cloud-based interactive theorem proving.
After illustrating why such a system is needed, the paper presents some of the
design challenges that ProofPeer needs to meet to succeed. Contexts are
presented as a solution to the problem of sharing proof state among the users
of ProofPeer. Chronicles are introduced as a way to organize and version
contexts
The Common HOL Platform
The Common HOL project aims to facilitate porting source code and proofs
between members of the HOL family of theorem provers. At the heart of the
project is the Common HOL Platform, which defines a standard HOL theory and API
that aims to be compatible with all HOL systems. So far, HOL Light and hol90
have been adapted for conformance, and HOL Zero was originally developed to
conform. In this paper we provide motivation for a platform, give an overview
of the Common HOL Platform's theory and API components, and show how to adapt
legacy systems. We also report on the platform's successful application in the
hand-translation of a few thousand lines of source code from HOL Light to HOL
Zero.Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2015, arXiv:1507.0837
- …