4,528 research outputs found
Formal correctness of a passive testing approach for timed systems
In this paper we extend our previous work on passive
testing of timed systems to establish a formal criterion to determine correctness of an implementation under test. In our framework, an invariant expresses the fact that if the implementation under test performs a given sequence of actions, then it must exhibit a behavior in a lapse of time reflected in the invariant. In a previous paper we gave an algorithm to establish the correctness of an invariant with respect to a specification. In this paper we continue the work by providing an algorithm to check the correctness of a log, recorded form the implementation under test, with respect to an invariant. We show the soundness of our method by relating it to an implementation relation. In addition to the theoretical framework we have developed a tool, called PASTE, that facilitates the automation of our passive testing approach
Runtime Verification Based on Executable Models: On-the-Fly Matching of Timed Traces
Runtime verification is checking whether a system execution satisfies or
violates a given correctness property. A procedure that automatically, and
typically on the fly, verifies conformance of the system's behavior to the
specified property is called a monitor. Nowadays, a variety of formalisms are
used to express properties on observed behavior of computer systems, and a lot
of methods have been proposed to construct monitors. However, it is a frequent
situation when advanced formalisms and methods are not needed, because an
executable model of the system is available. The original purpose and structure
of the model are out of importance; rather what is required is that the system
and its model have similar sets of interfaces. In this case, monitoring is
carried out as follows. Two "black boxes", the system and its reference model,
are executed in parallel and stimulated with the same input sequences; the
monitor dynamically captures their output traces and tries to match them. The
main problem is that a model is usually more abstract than the real system,
both in terms of functionality and timing. Therefore, trace-to-trace matching
is not straightforward and allows the system to produce events in different
order or even miss some of them. The paper studies on-the-fly conformance
relations for timed systems (i.e., systems whose inputs and outputs are
distributed along the time axis). It also suggests a practice-oriented
methodology for creating and configuring monitors for timed systems based on
executable models. The methodology has been successfully applied to a number of
industrial projects of simulation-based hardware verification.Comment: In Proceedings MBT 2013, arXiv:1303.037
An Adaptive Design Methodology for Reduction of Product Development Risk
Embedded systems interaction with environment inherently complicates
understanding of requirements and their correct implementation. However,
product uncertainty is highest during early stages of development. Design
verification is an essential step in the development of any system, especially
for Embedded System. This paper introduces a novel adaptive design methodology,
which incorporates step-wise prototyping and verification. With each adaptive
step product-realization level is enhanced while decreasing the level of
product uncertainty, thereby reducing the overall costs. The back-bone of this
frame-work is the development of Domain Specific Operational (DOP) Model and
the associated Verification Instrumentation for Test and Evaluation, developed
based on the DOP model. Together they generate functionally valid test-sequence
for carrying out prototype evaluation. With the help of a case study 'Multimode
Detection Subsystem' the application of this method is sketched. The design
methodologies can be compared by defining and computing a generic performance
criterion like Average design-cycle Risk. For the case study, by computing
Average design-cycle Risk, it is shown that the adaptive method reduces the
product development risk for a small increase in the total design cycle time.Comment: 21 pages, 9 figure
COST Action IC 1402 ArVI: Runtime Verification Beyond Monitoring -- Activity Report of Working Group 1
This report presents the activities of the first working group of the COST
Action ArVI, Runtime Verification beyond Monitoring. The report aims to provide
an overview of some of the major core aspects involved in Runtime Verification.
Runtime Verification is the field of research dedicated to the analysis of
system executions. It is often seen as a discipline that studies how a system
run satisfies or violates correctness properties. The report exposes a taxonomy
of Runtime Verification (RV) presenting the terminology involved with the main
concepts of the field. The report also develops the concept of instrumentation,
the various ways to instrument systems, and the fundamental role of
instrumentation in designing an RV framework. We also discuss how RV interplays
with other verification techniques such as model-checking, deductive
verification, model learning, testing, and runtime assertion checking. Finally,
we propose challenges in monitoring quantitative and statistical data beyond
detecting property violation
- âŠ