122 research outputs found

    Improved Purely Additive Fault-Tolerant Spanners

    Full text link
    Let GG be an unweighted nn-node undirected graph. A \emph{β\beta-additive spanner} of GG is a spanning subgraph HH of GG such that distances in HH are stretched at most by an additive term β\beta w.r.t. the corresponding distances in GG. A natural research goal related with spanners is that of designing \emph{sparse} spanners with \emph{low} stretch. In this paper, we focus on \emph{fault-tolerant} additive spanners, namely additive spanners which are able to preserve their additive stretch even when one edge fails. We are able to improve all known such spanners, in terms of either sparsity or stretch. In particular, we consider the sparsest known spanners with stretch 66, 2828, and 3838, and reduce the stretch to 44, 1010, and 1414, respectively (while keeping the same sparsity). Our results are based on two different constructions. On one hand, we show how to augment (by adding a \emph{small} number of edges) a fault-tolerant additive \emph{sourcewise spanner} (that approximately preserves distances only from a given set of source nodes) into one such spanner that preserves all pairwise distances. On the other hand, we show how to augment some known fault-tolerant additive spanners, based on clustering techniques. This way we decrease the additive stretch without any asymptotic increase in their size. We also obtain improved fault-tolerant additive spanners for the case of one vertex failure, and for the case of ff edge failures.Comment: 17 pages, 4 figures, ESA 201

    Network Design with Coverage Costs

    Get PDF
    We study network design with a cost structure motivated by redundancy in data traffic. We are given a graph, g groups of terminals, and a universe of data packets. Each group of terminals desires a subset of the packets from its respective source. The cost of routing traffic on any edge in the network is proportional to the total size of the distinct packets that the edge carries. Our goal is to find a minimum cost routing. We focus on two settings. In the first, the collection of packet sets desired by source-sink pairs is laminar. For this setting, we present a primal-dual based 2-approximation, improving upon a logarithmic approximation due to Barman and Chawla (2012). In the second setting, packet sets can have non-trivial intersection. We focus on the case where each packet is desired by either a single terminal group or by all of the groups, and the graph is unweighted. For this setting we present an O(log g)-approximation. Our approximation for the second setting is based on a novel spanner-type construction in unweighted graphs that, given a collection of g vertex subsets, finds a subgraph of cost only a constant factor more than the minimum spanning tree of the graph, such that every subset in the collection has a Steiner tree in the subgraph of cost at most O(log g) that of its minimum Steiner tree in the original graph. We call such a subgraph a group spanner.Comment: Updated version with additional result

    Approximating the Norms of Graph Spanners

    Get PDF

    Global Computation in a Poorly Connected World: Fast Rumor Spreading with No Dependence on Conductance

    Get PDF
    In this paper, we study the question of how efficiently a collection of interconnected nodes can perform a global computation in the widely studied GOSSIP model of communication. In this model, nodes do not know the global topology of the network, and they may only initiate contact with a single neighbor in each round. This model contrasts with the much less restrictive LOCAL model, where a node may simultaneously communicate with all of its neighbors in a single round. A basic question in this setting is how many rounds of communication are required for the information dissemination problem, in which each node has some piece of information and is required to collect all others. In this paper, we give an algorithm that solves the information dissemination problem in at most O(D+polylog(n))O(D+\text{polylog}{(n)}) rounds in a network of diameter DD, withno dependence on the conductance. This is at most an additive polylogarithmic factor from the trivial lower bound of DD, which applies even in the LOCAL model. In fact, we prove that something stronger is true: any algorithm that requires TT rounds in the LOCAL model can be simulated in O(T+polylog(n))O(T +\mathrm{polylog}(n)) rounds in the GOSSIP model. We thus prove that these two models of distributed computation are essentially equivalent

    Improved Approximation for the Directed Spanner Problem

    Full text link
    We prove that the size of the sparsest directed k-spanner of a graph can be approximated in polynomial time to within a factor of O~(n)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n}), for all k >= 3. This improves the O~(n2/3)\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})-approximation recently shown by Dinitz and Krauthgamer

    Spanner Approximations in Practice

    Get PDF
    A multiplicative α\alpha-spanner HH is a subgraph of G=(V,E)G=(V,E) with the same vertices and fewer edges that preserves distances up to the factor α\alpha, i.e., dH(u,v)≤α⋅dG(u,v)d_H(u,v)\leq\alpha\cdot d_G(u,v) for all vertices uu, vv. While many algorithms have been developed to find good spanners in terms of approximation guarantees, no experimental studies comparing different approaches exist. We implemented a rich selection of those algorithms and evaluate them on a variety of instances regarding, e.g., their running time, sparseness, lightness, and effective stretch
    • …
    corecore