1,385 research outputs found
Software Grand Exposure: SGX Cache Attacks Are Practical
Side-channel information leakage is a known limitation of SGX. Researchers
have demonstrated that secret-dependent information can be extracted from
enclave execution through page-fault access patterns. Consequently, various
recent research efforts are actively seeking countermeasures to SGX
side-channel attacks. It is widely assumed that SGX may be vulnerable to other
side channels, such as cache access pattern monitoring, as well. However, prior
to our work, the practicality and the extent of such information leakage was
not studied.
In this paper we demonstrate that cache-based attacks are indeed a serious
threat to the confidentiality of SGX-protected programs. Our goal was to design
an attack that is hard to mitigate using known defenses, and therefore we mount
our attack without interrupting enclave execution. This approach has major
technical challenges, since the existing cache monitoring techniques experience
significant noise if the victim process is not interrupted. We designed and
implemented novel attack techniques to reduce this noise by leveraging the
capabilities of the privileged adversary. Our attacks are able to recover
confidential information from SGX enclaves, which we illustrate in two example
cases: extraction of an entire RSA-2048 key during RSA decryption, and
detection of specific human genome sequences during genomic indexing. We show
that our attacks are more effective than previous cache attacks and harder to
mitigate than previous SGX side-channel attacks
Execution Integrity with In-Place Encryption
Instruction set randomization (ISR) was initially proposed with the main goal
of countering code-injection attacks. However, ISR seems to have lost its
appeal since code-injection attacks became less attractive because protection
mechanisms such as data execution prevention (DEP) as well as code-reuse
attacks became more prevalent.
In this paper, we show that ISR can be extended to also protect against
code-reuse attacks while at the same time offering security guarantees similar
to those of software diversity, control-flow integrity, and information hiding.
We present Scylla, a scheme that deploys a new technique for in-place code
encryption to hide the code layout of a randomized binary, and restricts the
control flow to a benign execution path. This allows us to i) implicitly
restrict control-flow targets to basic block entries without requiring the
extraction of a control-flow graph, ii) achieve execution integrity within
legitimate basic blocks, and iii) hide the underlying code layout under
malicious read access to the program. Our analysis demonstrates that Scylla is
capable of preventing state-of-the-art attacks such as just-in-time
return-oriented programming (JIT-ROP) and crash-resistant oriented programming
(CROP). We extensively evaluate our prototype implementation of Scylla and show
feasible performance overhead. We also provide details on how this overhead can
be significantly reduced with dedicated hardware support
KASR: A Reliable and Practical Approach to Attack Surface Reduction of Commodity OS Kernels
Commodity OS kernels have broad attack surfaces due to the large code base
and the numerous features such as device drivers. For a real-world use case
(e.g., an Apache Server), many kernel services are unused and only a small
amount of kernel code is used. Within the used code, a certain part is invoked
only at runtime while the rest are executed at startup and/or shutdown phases
in the kernel's lifetime run. In this paper, we propose a reliable and
practical system, named KASR, which transparently reduces attack surfaces of
commodity OS kernels at runtime without requiring their source code. The KASR
system, residing in a trusted hypervisor, achieves the attack surface reduction
through a two-step approach: (1) reliably depriving unused code of executable
permissions, and (2) transparently segmenting used code and selectively
activating them. We implement a prototype of KASR on Xen-4.8.2 hypervisor and
evaluate its security effectiveness on Linux kernel-4.4.0-87-generic. Our
evaluation shows that KASR reduces the kernel attack surface by 64% and trims
off 40% of CVE vulnerabilities. Besides, KASR successfully detects and blocks
all 6 real-world kernel rootkits. We measure its performance overhead with
three benchmark tools (i.e., SPECINT, httperf and bonnie++). The experimental
results indicate that KASR imposes less than 1% performance overhead (compared
to an unmodified Xen hypervisor) on all the benchmarks.Comment: The work has been accepted at the 21st International Symposium on
Research in Attacks, Intrusions, and Defenses 201
DR.SGX: Hardening SGX Enclaves against Cache Attacks with Data Location Randomization
Recent research has demonstrated that Intel's SGX is vulnerable to various
software-based side-channel attacks. In particular, attacks that monitor CPU
caches shared between the victim enclave and untrusted software enable accurate
leakage of secret enclave data. Known defenses assume developer assistance,
require hardware changes, impose high overhead, or prevent only some of the
known attacks. In this paper we propose data location randomization as a novel
defensive approach to address the threat of side-channel attacks. Our main goal
is to break the link between the cache observations by the privileged adversary
and the actual data accesses by the victim. We design and implement a
compiler-based tool called DR.SGX that instruments enclave code such that data
locations are permuted at the granularity of cache lines. We realize the
permutation with the CPU's cryptographic hardware-acceleration units providing
secure randomization. To prevent correlation of repeated memory accesses we
continuously re-randomize all enclave data during execution. Our solution
effectively protects many (but not all) enclaves from cache attacks and
provides a complementary enclave hardening technique that is especially useful
against unpredictable information leakage
Lockdown: Dynamic Control-Flow Integrity
Applications written in low-level languages without type or memory safety are
especially prone to memory corruption. Attackers gain code execution
capabilities through such applications despite all currently deployed defenses
by exploiting memory corruption vulnerabilities. Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
is a promising defense mechanism that restricts open control-flow transfers to
a static set of well-known locations. We present Lockdown, an approach to
dynamic CFI that protects legacy, binary-only executables and libraries.
Lockdown adaptively learns the control-flow graph of a running process using
information from a trusted dynamic loader. The sandbox component of Lockdown
restricts interactions between different shared objects to imported and
exported functions by enforcing fine-grained CFI checks. Our prototype
implementation shows that dynamic CFI results in low performance overhead.Comment: ETH Technical Repor
- …