Fault-tolerant additive weighted geometric spanners

Let S be a set of n points and let w be a function that assigns non-negative weights to points in S. The additive weighted distance d_w(p, q) between two points p,q belonging to S is defined as w(p) + d(p, q) + w(q) if p \ne q and it is zero if p = q. Here, d(p, q) denotes the (geodesic) Euclidean distance between p and q. A graph G(S, E) is called a t-spanner for the additive weighted set S of points if for any two points p and q in S the distance between p and q in graph G is at most t.d_w(p, q) for a real number t > 1. Here, d_w(p,q) is the additive weighted distance between p and q. For some integer k \geq 1, a t-spanner G for the set S is a (k, t)-vertex fault-tolerant additive weighted spanner, denoted with (k, t)-VFTAWS, if for any set S' \subset S with cardinality at most k, the graph G \ S' is a t-spanner for the points in S \ S'. For any given real number \epsilon > 0, we obtain the following results: - When the points in S belong to Euclidean space R^d, an algorithm to compute a (k,(2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(kn) edges for the metric space (S, d_w). Here, for any two points p, q \in S, d(p, q) is the Euclidean distance between p and q in R^d. - When the points in S belong to a simple polygon P, for the metric space (S, d_w), one algorithm to compute a geodesic (k, (2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(\frac{k n}{\epsilon^{2}}\lg{n}) edges and another algorithm to compute a geodesic (k, (\sqrt{10} + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(kn(\lg{n})^2) edges. Here, for any two points p, q \in S, d(p, q) is the geodesic Euclidean distance along the shortest path between p and q in P. - When the points in $S$ lie on a terrain T, an algorithm to compute a geodesic (k, (2 + \epsilon))-VFTAWS with O(\frac{k n}{\epsilon^{2}}\lg{n}) edges.Comment: a few update

A Spanner for the Day After

We show how to construct $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanner over a set $P$ of $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ that is resilient to a catastrophic failure of nodes. Specifically, for prescribed parameters $\vartheta,\varepsilon \in (0,1)$, the computed spanner $G$ has $O\bigl(\varepsilon^{-c} \vartheta^{-6} n \log n (\log\log n)^6 \bigr)$ edges, where $c= O(d)$. Furthermore, for any $k$, and any deleted set $B \subseteq P$ of $k$ points, the residual graph $G \setminus B$ is $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanner for all the points of $P$ except for $(1+\vartheta)k$ of them. No previous constructions, beyond the trivial clique with $O(n^2)$ edges, were known such that only a tiny additional fraction (i.e., $\vartheta$) lose their distance preserving connectivity. Our construction works by first solving the exact problem in one dimension, and then showing a surprisingly simple and elegant construction in higher dimensions, that uses the one-dimensional construction in a black box fashion

The Stretch Factor of the Delaunay Triangulation Is Less Than 1.998

Let $S$ be a finite set of points in the Euclidean plane. Let $D$ be a Delaunay triangulation of $S$. The {\em stretch factor} (also known as {\em dilation} or {\em spanning ratio}) of $D$ is the maximum ratio, among all points $p$ and $q$ in $S$, of the shortest path distance from $p$ to $q$ in $D$ over the Euclidean distance $||pq||$. Proving a tight bound on the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation has been a long standing open problem in computational geometry. In this paper we prove that the stretch factor of the Delaunay triangulation of a set of points in the plane is less than $\rho = 1.998$, improving the previous best upper bound of 2.42 by Keil and Gutwin (1989). Our bound 1.998 is better than the current upper bound of 2.33 for the special case when the point set is in convex position by Cui, Kanj and Xia (2009). This upper bound breaks the barrier 2, which is significant because previously no family of plane graphs was known to have a stretch factor guaranteed to be less than 2 on any set of points.Comment: 41 pages, 16 figures. A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 27th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry (SoCG 2011). This is a revised version of the previous preprint [v1

An optimal algorithm for computing angle-constrained spanners

Let S be a set of n points in ℝd. A graph G = (S,E) is called a t-spanner for S, if for any two points p and q in S, the shortest-path distance in G between p and q is at most t|pq|, where |pq| denotes the Euclidean distance between p and q. The graph G is called θ-angle-constrained, if any two distinct edges sharing an endpoint make an angle of at least θ. It is shown that, for any θ with 0 < θ < π/3, a θ-angle-constrained t-spanner can be computed in O(n logn) time, where t depends only on θ

Light Euclidean Steiner Spanners in the Plane

Lightness is a fundamental parameter for Euclidean spanners; it is the ratio of the spanner weight to the weight of the minimum spanning tree of a finite set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. In a recent breakthrough, Le and Solomon (2019) established the precise dependencies on $\varepsilon>0$ and $d\in \mathbb{N}$ of the minimum lightness of $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners, and observed that additional Steiner points can substantially improve the lightness. Le and Solomon (2020) constructed Steiner $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners of lightness $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\log\Delta)$ in the plane, where $\Delta\geq \Omega(\sqrt{n})$ is the \emph{spread} of the point set, defined as the ratio between the maximum and minimum distance between a pair of points. They also constructed spanners of lightness $\tilde{O}(\varepsilon^{-(d+1)/2})$ in dimensions $d\geq 3$. Recently, Bhore and T\'{o}th (2020) established a lower bound of $\Omega(\varepsilon^{-d/2})$ for the lightness of Steiner $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanners in $\mathbb{R}^d$, for $d\ge 2$. The central open problem in this area is to close the gap between the lower and upper bounds in all dimensions $d\geq 2$. In this work, we show that for every finite set of points in the plane and every $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a Euclidean Steiner $(1+\varepsilon)$-spanner of lightness $O(\varepsilon^{-1})$; this matches the lower bound for $d=2$. We generalize the notion of shallow light trees, which may be of independent interest, and use directional spanners and a modified window partitioning scheme to achieve a tight weight analysis.Comment: 29 pages, 14 figures. A 17-page extended abstract will appear in the Proceedings of the 37th International Symposium on Computational Geometr