Eliminating Latent Discrimination: Train Then Mask

How can we control for latent discrimination in predictive models? How can we provably remove it? Such questions are at the heart of algorithmic fairness and its impacts on society. In this paper, we define a new operational fairness criteria, inspired by the well-understood notion of omitted variable-bias in statistics and econometrics. Our notion of fairness effectively controls for sensitive features and provides diagnostics for deviations from fair decision making. We then establish analytical and algorithmic results about the existence of a fair classifier in the context of supervised learning. Our results readily imply a simple, but rather counter-intuitive, strategy for eliminating latent discrimination. In order to prevent other features proxying for sensitive features, we need to include sensitive features in the training phase, but exclude them in the test/evaluation phase while controlling for their effects. We evaluate the performance of our algorithm on several real-world datasets and show how fairness for these datasets can be improved with a very small loss in accuracy

Achieving Long-term Fairness in Submodular Maximization through Randomization

Submodular function optimization has numerous applications in machine learning and data analysis, including data summarization which aims to identify a concise and diverse set of data points from a large dataset. It is important to implement fairness-aware algorithms when dealing with data items that may contain sensitive attributes like race or gender, to prevent biases that could lead to unequal representation of different groups. With this in mind, we investigate the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function while meeting group fairness constraints. Unlike previous studies in this area, we allow for randomized solutions, with the objective being to calculate a distribution over feasible sets such that the expected number of items selected from each group is subject to constraints in the form of upper and lower thresholds, ensuring that the representation of each group remains balanced in the long term. Here a set is considered feasible if its size does not exceed a constant value of $b$. Our research includes the development of a series of approximation algorithms for this problem.Comment: This paper has been accepted to 19th Cologne-Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimizatio

Variational Fair Clustering

We propose a general variational framework of fair clustering, which integrates an original Kullback-Leibler (KL) fairness term with a large class of clustering objectives, including prototype or graph based. Fundamentally different from the existing combinatorial and spectral solutions, our variational multi-term approach enables to control the trade-off levels between the fairness and clustering objectives. We derive a general tight upper bound based on a concave-convex decomposition of our fairness term, its Lipschitz-gradient property and the Pinsker's inequality. Our tight upper bound can be jointly optimized with various clustering objectives, while yielding a scalable solution, with convergence guarantee. Interestingly, at each iteration, it performs an independent update for each assignment variable. Therefore, it can be easily distributed for large-scale datasets. This scalability is important as it enables to explore different trade-off levels between the fairness and clustering objectives. Unlike spectral relaxation, our formulation does not require computing its eigenvalue decomposition. We report comprehensive evaluations and comparisons with state-of-the-art methods over various fair-clustering benchmarks, which show that our variational formulation can yield highly competitive solutions in terms of fairness and clustering objectives.Comment: Accepted to be published in AAAI 2021. The Code is available at: https://github.com/imtiazziko/Variational-Fair-Clusterin