24 research outputs found
Fair Influence Maximization: A Welfare Optimization Approach
Several behavioral, social, and public health interventions, such as
suicide/HIV prevention or community preparedness against natural disasters,
leverage social network information to maximize outreach. Algorithmic influence
maximization techniques have been proposed to aid with the choice of "peer
leaders" or "influencers" in such interventions. Yet, traditional algorithms
for influence maximization have not been designed with these interventions in
mind. As a result, they may disproportionately exclude minority communities
from the benefits of the intervention. This has motivated research on fair
influence maximization. Existing techniques come with two major drawbacks.
First, they require committing to a single fairness measure. Second, these
measures are typically imposed as strict constraints leading to undesirable
properties such as wastage of resources.
To address these shortcomings, we provide a principled characterization of
the properties that a fair influence maximization algorithm should satisfy. In
particular, we propose a framework based on social welfare theory, wherein the
cardinal utilities derived by each community are aggregated using the
isoelastic social welfare functions. Under this framework, the trade-off
between fairness and efficiency can be controlled by a single inequality
aversion design parameter. We then show under what circumstances our proposed
principles can be satisfied by a welfare function. The resulting optimization
problem is monotone and submodular and can be solved efficiently with
optimality guarantees. Our framework encompasses as special cases leximin and
proportional fairness. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real world
datasets including a case study on landslide risk management demonstrate the
efficacy of the proposed framework.Comment: The short version of this paper appears in the proceedings of AAAI-2
Simplification and Improvement of MMS Approximation
We consider the problem of fairly allocating a set of indivisible goods among
agents with additive valuations, using the popular fairness notion of
maximin share (MMS). Since MMS allocations do not always exist, a series of
works provided existence and algorithms for approximate MMS allocations. The
current best approximation factor, for which the existence is known, is
[Garg and Taki, 2021]. Most of these results
are based on complicated analyses, especially those providing better than
factor. Moreover, since no tight example is known of the Garg-Taki algorithm,
it is unclear if this is the best factor of this approach. In this paper, we
significantly simplify the analysis of this algorithm and also improve the
existence guarantee to a factor of . For small , this provides a noticeable improvement.
Furthermore, we present a tight example of this algorithm, showing that this
may be the best factor one can hope for with the current techniques