Entry and access : how shareability comes about

Shareability is a design principle that refers to how a system, interface, or device engages a group of collocated, co-present users in shared interactions around the same content (or the same object). This is broken down in terms of a set of components that facilitate or constrain the way an interface (or product) is made shareable. Central are the notions of access points and entry points. Entry points invite and entice people into engagement, providing an advance overview, minimal barriers, and a honeypot effect that draws observers into the activity. Access points enable users to join a group's activity, allowing perceptual and manipulative access and fluidity of sharing. We show how these terms can be useful for informing analysis and empirical research

Creative idea exploration within the structure of a guiding framework : the card brainstorming game

I present a card brainstorming exercise that transforms a conceptual tangible interaction framework into a tool for creative dialogue and discuss the experiences made in using it. Ten sessions with this card game demonstrate the frameworks' versatility and utility. Observation and participant feedback highlight the value of a provocative question format and of the metaphor of a card game

Out there and in here: design for blended scientific inquiry learning

One of the benefits of mobile technologies is to combine ‘the digital’ (e.g., data, information, photos) with ‘field’ experiences in novel ways that are contextualized by people’s current located activities. However, often cost, mobility disabilities and time exclude students from engaging in such peripatetic experiences. The Out There and In Here project, is exploring a combination of mobile and tabletop technologies in support for collaborative learning. A system is being developed for synchronous collaboration between geology students in the field and peers at an indoor location. The overarching goal of this research is to develop technologies that support people working together in a suitable manner for their locations. There are two OTIH project research threads. The first deals with disabled learner access issues: these complex issues are being reviewed in subsequent evaluations and publications. This paper will deal with issues of technology supported learning design for remote and co-located science learners. Several stakeholder evaluations and two field trials have reviewed two research questions: 1. What will enhance the learning experience for those in the field and laboratory? 2. How can learning trajectories and appropriate technologies be designed to support equitable co-located and remote learning collaboration? This paper focuses on describing the iterative linked development of technologies and scientific inquiry pedagogy. Two stages within the research project are presented. The 1st stage details several pilot studies over 3 years with 21 student participants in synchronous collaborations with traditional technology and pedagogical models. Findings revealed that this was an engaging and useful experience although issues of equity in collaboration needed further research. The 2nd stage, in this project, has been to evaluate data from over 25 stakeholders (academics, learning and technology designers) to develop pervasive ambient technological solutions supporting orchestration of mixed levels of pedagogy (i.e. abstract synthesis to specific investigation). Middleware between tabletop ‘surface’ technologies and mobile devices are being designed with Microsoft and OOKL (a mobile software company) to support these developments. Initial findings reveal issues around equity, ownership and professional identity

Toward emotional interactive videogames for children with autism spectrum disorder

Technology and videogames have been proven as motivating tools for working attention and complex communication skills, especially in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). In this work, we present two experiences that used interactive games for promoting communication and attention. The first game considers emotions in order to measure children’s attention, concentration and satisfaction, while the second uses tangible tabletops for fostering cognitive planning. The analysis of the results obtained allows to propose a new study integrating both, in which the tangible interactive game is complemented with the emotional trainer in a way that allows identifying and classifying children’s emotion with ASD when they collaborate to solve cognitively significant and contextualized challenges. The first application proposed is an emotional trainer application in which the child can work out the seven basic emotions (happiness, sadness, fear, disgust, anger, surprise and neutral). Further, a serious videogame is proposed: a 3D maze where the emotions can be captured. The second case study was carried out in a Special Education Center, where a set of activities for working cognitive planning was proposed. In this case, a tangible interactive tabletop was used to analyze, in students with ASD, how the communication processes with these interfaces affect to the attention, memory, successive and simultaneous processing that compose cognitive planning from the PASS model. The results of the first study, suggest that the autistic children did not act with previous planning, but they used their perception to adjust their actions a posteriori (that explains the higher number of collisions). On the second case study, the successive processing was not explored. The inclusion of the mazes of case study 1 to a semantic rich scenario could allow us to measure the prior planning and the emotions involved in the maze game. The new physiological sensors will also help to validate the emotions felt by the children. The first study has as objective the capability to imitate emotions and resolve a maze without semantic context. The second study organized all the actions from a semantic context close to users. The attention results presented by the second study are coherent with the first study and complement it showing that attention can be receptive or selective. In the first study case, the receptive attention was the focus of analysis. In the second case, both contributed to explain and understand how it can be developed from a videogame

Collaborative Practices that Support Creativity in Design

Design is a ubiquitous, collaborative and highly material activity. Because of the embodied nature of the design profession, designers apply certain collaborative practices to enhance creativity in their everyday work. Within the domain of industrial design, we studied two educational design departments over a period of eight months. Using examples from our fieldwork, we develop our results around three broad themes related to collaborative practices that support the creativity of design professionals: 1) externalization, 2) use of physical space, and 3) use of bodies. We believe that these themes of collaborative practices could provide new insights into designing technologies for supporting a varied set of design activities. We describe two conceptual collaborative systems derived from the results of our study

Establishing the design knowledge for emerging interaction platforms

While awaiting a variety of innovative interactive products and services to appear in the market in the near future such as interactive tabletops, interactive TVs, public multi-touch walls, and other embedded appliances, this paper calls for preparation for the arrival of such interactive platforms based on their interactivity. We advocate studying, understanding and establishing the foundation for interaction characteristics and affordances and design implications for these platforms which we know will soon emerge and penetrate our everyday lives. We review some of the archetypal interaction platform categories of the future and highlight the current status of the design knowledge-base accumulated to date and the current rate of growth for each of these. We use example designs illustrating design issues and considerations based on the authors’ 12-year experience in pioneering novel applications in various forms and styles

Mechanisms for collaboration: a design and evaluation framework for multi-user interfaces

Multi-user interfaces are said to provide “natural” interaction in supporting collaboration, compared to individual and noncolocated technologies. We identify three mechanisms accounting for the success of such interfaces: high awareness of others' actions and intentions, high control over the interface, and high availability of background information. We challenge the idea that interaction over such interfaces is necessarily “natural” and argue that everyday interaction involves constraints on awareness, control, and availability. These constraints help people interact more smoothly. We draw from social developmental psychology to characterize the design of multi-user interfaces in terms of how constraints on these mechanisms can be best used to promote collaboration. We use this framework of mechanisms and constraints to explain the successes and failures of existing designs, then apply it to three case studies of design, and finally derive from them a set of questions to consider when designing and analysing multi-user interfaces for collaboration

From entry to access: How shareability comes about

Shareability is a design principle that refers to how a system, interface, or device engages a group of collocated, co-present users in shared interactions around the same content (or the same object). This is broken down in terms of a set of components that facilitate or constrain the way an interface (or product) is made shareable. Central are the notions of access points and entry points. Entry points invite and entice people into engagement, providing an advance overview, minimal barriers, and a honeypot effect that draws observers into the activity. Access points enable users to join a group's activity, allowing perceptual and manipulative access and fluidity of sharing. We show how these terms can be useful for informing analysis and empirical research

TangiWheel: A widget for manipulating collections on tabletop displays supporting hybrid Input modality

In this paper we present TangiWheel, a collection manipulation widget for tabletop displays. Our implementation is flexible, allowing either multi-touch or interaction, or even a hybrid scheme to better suit user choice and convenience. Different TangiWheel aspects and features are compared with other existing widgets for collection manipulation. The study reveals that TangiWheel is the first proposal to support a hybrid input modality with large resemblance levels between touch and tangible interaction styles. Several experiments were conducted to evaluate the techniques used in each input scheme for a better understanding of tangible surface interfaces in complex tasks performed by a single user (e.g., involving a typical master-slave exploration pattern). The results show that tangibles perform significantly better than fingers, despite dealing with a greater number of interactions, in situations that require a large number of acquisitions and basic manipulation tasks such as establishing location and orientation. However, when users have to perform multiple exploration and selection operations that do not require previous basic manipulation tasks, for instance when collections are fixed in the interface layout, touch input is significantly better in terms of required time and number of actions. Finally, when a more elastic collection layout or more complex additional insertion or displacement operations are needed, the hybrid and tangible approaches clearly outperform finger-based interactions.. ©2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC & Science Press, ChinaThe work is supported by the Ministry of Education of Spain under Grant No. TSI2010-20488. Alejandro Catala is supported by an FPU fellowship for pre-doctoral research staff training granted by the Ministry of Education of Spain with reference AP2006-00181.Catalá Bolós, A.; García Sanjuan, F.; Jaén Martínez, FJ.; Mocholi Agües, JA. (2012). TangiWheel: A widget for manipulating collections on tabletop displays supporting hybrid Input modality. Journal of Computer Science and Technology. 27(4):811-829. doi:10.1007/s11390-012-1266-4S811829274Jordà S, Geiger G, Alonso M, Kaltenbrunner M. The reacTable: Exploring the synergy between live music performance and tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. TEI 2007, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Feb. 15-17, 2007, pp.139–146.Vandoren P, van Laerhoven T, Claesen L, Taelman J, Raymaekers C, van Reeth F. IntuPaint: Bridging the gap between physical and digital painting. In Proc. TABLETOP2008, Amterdam, the Netherlands, Oct. 1-3, 2008, pp.65–72.Schöning J, Hecht B, Raubal M, Krüger A, Marsh M, Rohs M. Improving interaction with virtual globes through spatial thinking: Helping users ask “why?”. In Proc. IUI 2008, Canary Islans, Spain, Jan. 13-16, 2008, pp.129–138.Fitzmaurice GW, BuxtonW. An empirical evaluation of graspable user interfaces: Towards specialized, space-multiplexed input. In Proc. CHI 1997, Atlanta, USA, March 22-27, 1997, pp.43–50.Tuddenham P, Kirk D, Izadi S. Graspables revisited: Multitouch vs. tangible input for tabletop displays in acquisition and manipulation tasks. In Proc. CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA, April 10-15, 2010, pp.2223–2232.Lucchi A, Jermann P, Zufferey G, Dillenbourg P. An empirical evaluation of touch and tangible interfaces for tabletop displays. In Proc. TEI 2010, Cambridge, USA, Jan. 25-27, 2010, pp.177–184.Fitzmaurice G W, Ishii H, Buxton W. Bricks: Laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces. In Proc. CHI 1995, Denver, USA, May 7-11, 1995, pp.442–449.Ishii H, Ullmer B. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. CHI 1997, Atlanta, USA, March 22-27, 1997, pp.234–241.Ullmer B, Ishii H, Glas D. mediaBlocks: Physical containers, transports, and controls for online media. In Proc. SIGGRAPH1998, Orlando, USA, July 19-24, 1998, pp.379–386.Shen C, Hancock M S, Forlines C, Vernier F D. CoR2Ds: Context-rooted rotatable draggables for tabletop interaction. In Proc. CHI 2005, Portland, USA, April 2-7, 2005, pp.1781–1784.Lepinski G J, Grossman T, Fitzmaurice G. The design and evaluation of multitouch marking menus. In Proc. CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA, April 10-15, 2010, pp.2233–2242.Accot J, Zhai S. Beyond Fitts’ law: Models for trajectorybased HCI tasks. In Proc. CHI 1997, Atlanta, USA, March 22-27, 1997, pp.295–302.Song H, Kim B, Lee B, Seo J. A comparative evaluation on tree visualization methods for hierarchical structures with large fan-outs. In Proc. CHI 2010, Atlanta, USA, April 10-15, 2010, pp.223–232.Bailly G, Lecolinet E, Nigay L. Wave menus: Improving the novice mode of hierarchical marking menus. In Proc. INTERACT2007, Río de Janeiro, Brazil, Sept. 10-14, 2007, pp.475–488.Zhao S, Agrawala M, Hinckley K. Zone and polygon menus: Using relative position to increase the breadth of multi-stroke marking menus. In Proc. CHI 2006, Montreal, Canada, April 24-27, 2006, pp.1077–1086.Patten J, Recht B, Ishii H. Interaction techniques for musical performance with tabletop tangible interfaces. In Proc. ACE2006, Hollywood, USA, Jun. 14-16, 2006, Article No.27.Weiss M, Wagner J, Jansen Y, Jennings R, Khoshabeh R, Hollan J D, Borchers J. SLAP widgets: Bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. CHI 2009, Boston, USA, April 4-9, 2009, pp.481–490.Hancock M, Hilliges O, Collins C, Baur D, Carpendale S. Exploring tangible and direct touch interfaces for manipulating 2D and 3D information on a digital table. In Proc. ITS 2009, Banff, Canada, Nov. 23-25, pp.77–84.Hilliges O, Baur D, Butz A. Photohelix: Browsing, sorting and sharing digital photo collections. In Proc. Horizontal Interactive Human-Computer Systems (TABLETOP2007), Newport, Rhode Island, USA, Oct. 10-12, 2007, pp.87–94.Hesselmann T, Flöring S, Schmidt M. Stacked half-Pie menus: Navigating nested menus on interactive tabletops. In Proc. ITS 2009, Banff, Canada, Nov. 23-25, 2009, pp.173–180.Gallardo D, Jordà S. Tangible jukebox: Back to palpable music. In Proc. TEI 2010, Boston, USA, Jan. 25-27, 2010, pp.199–202.Fishkin K. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2004, 8(5): 347–358.Catala A, Jaen J, Martinez-Villaronga A A, Mocholi J A. AGORAS: Exploring creative learning on tangible user interfaces. In Proc. COMPSAC 2011, Munich, Germany, July 18-22, 2011, pp.326–335.Catala A, Garcia-Sanjuan F, Azorin J, Jaen J, Mocholi J A. Exploring direct communication and manipulation on interactive surfaces to foster novelty in a creative learning environment. IJCSRA, 2012, 2(1): 15–24.Catala A, Jaen J, van Dijk B, Jord`a S. Exploring tabletops as an effective tool to foster creativity traits. In Proc. TEI 2012, Kingston, Canada, Feb. 19-22, 2012, pp.143–150.Hopkins D. Directional selection is easy as pie menus. In: The Usenix Association Newsletter, 1987, 12(5): 103.Microsoft Surface User Experience Guidelines. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff318692.aspx , May 2011.Maydak M, Stromer R, Mackay H A, Stoddard L T. Stimulus classes in matching to sample and sequence production: The emergence of numeric relations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1995, 16(3): 179–204

Tabletop Tangible Interfaces for Music Performance: Design and Evaluation

This thesis investigates a new generation of collaborative systems: tabletop tangible interfaces (TTIs) for music performance or musical tabletops. Musical tabletops are designed for professional musical performance, as well as for casual interaction in public settings. These systems support co-located collaboration, offered by a shared interface. However, we still know little about their challenges and opportunities for collaborative musical practice: in particular, how to best support beginners or experts or both. This thesis explores the nature of collaboration on TTIs for music performance between beginners, experts, or both. Empirical work was done in two stages: 1) an exploratory stage; and 2) an experimental stage. In the exploratory stage we studied the Reactable, a commercial musical tabletop designed for beginners and experts. In particular, we explored its use in two environments: a multi-session study with expert musicians in a casual lab setting; and a field study with casual visitors in a science centre. In the experimental stage we conducted a controlled experiment for mixed groups using a bespoke musical tabletop interface, SoundXY4. The design of this study was informed by the previous stage about a need to support better real-time awareness of the group activity (workspace awareness) in early interactions. For the three studies, groups musical improvisation was video-captured unobtrusively with the aim of understanding natural uses during group musical practice. Rich video data was carefully analysed focusing on the nature of social interaction and how workspace awareness was manifested. The findings suggest that musical tabletops can support peer learning during multiple sessions; fluid between-group social interaction in public settings; and a democratic and ecological approach to music performance. The findings also point to how workspace awareness can be enhanced in early interactions with TTIs using auditory feedback with ambisonics spatialisation. The thesis concludes with theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for future research in New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME), tabletop studies, and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)