24 research outputs found

    Accelerating the alternating projection algorithm for the case of affine subspaces using supporting hyperplanes

    Full text link
    The von Neumann-Halperin method of alternating projections converges strongly to the projection of a given point onto the intersection of finitely many closed affine subspaces. We propose acceleration schemes making use of two ideas: Firstly, each projection onto an affine subspace identifies a hyperplane of codimension 1 containing the intersection, and secondly, it is easy to project onto a finite intersection of such hyperplanes. We give conditions for which our accelerations converge strongly. Finally, we perform numerical experiments to show that these accelerations perform well for a matrix model updating problem.Comment: 16 pages, 3 figures (Corrected minor typos in Remark 2.2, Algorithm 2.5, proof of Theorem 3.12, as well as elaborated on certain proof

    Functions with Prescribed Best Linear Approximations

    Get PDF
    A common problem in applied mathematics is to find a function in a Hilbert space with prescribed best approximations from a finite number of closed vector subspaces. In the present paper we study the question of the existence of solutions to such problems. A finite family of subspaces is said to satisfy the \emph{Inverse Best Approximation Property (IBAP)} if there exists a point that admits any selection of points from these subspaces as best approximations. We provide various characterizations of the IBAP in terms of the geometry of the subspaces. Connections between the IBAP and the linear convergence rate of the periodic projection algorithm for solving the underlying affine feasibility problem are also established. The results are applied to problems in harmonic analysis, integral equations, signal theory, and wavelet frames

    How good are projection methods for convex feasibility problems?

    Get PDF
    We consider simple projection methods for solving convex feasibility problems. Both successive and sequential methods are considered, and heuristics to improve these are suggested. Unfortunately, particularly given the large literature which might make one think otherwise, numerical tests indicate that in general none of the variants considered are especially effective or competitive with more sophisticated alternatives
    corecore