Expressiveness of Full First-Order Constraints in the Algebra of Finite or Infinite Trees

International audienceWe are interested in the expressiveness of constraints represented by general first order formulae, with equality as unique relation symbol and function symbols taken from an infinite set F. The chosen domain is the set of trees whose nodes, in possibly infinite number, are labelled by elements of F. The operation linked to each element f of F is the mapping (a 1,..., a n ) map b, where b is the tree whose initial node is labelled f and whose sequence of daughters is a 1,..., a n . We first consider tree constraints involving long alternated sequences of quantifiers existforallexistforall.... We show how to express winning positions of two-person games with such constraints and apply our results to two examples. We then construct a family of strongly expressive tree constraints, inspired by a constructive proof of a complexity result by Pawel Mielniczuk. This family involves the huge number agr(k), obtained by top down evaluating a power tower of 2's, of height k. By a tree constraint of size proportional to k, it is then possible to define a tree having exactly agr(k) nodes or to express the multiplication table computed by a Prolog machine executing up to agr(k) instructions. By replacing the Prolog machine with a Turing machine we show the quasi-universality of tree constraints, that is to say, the ability to concisely describe trees which the most powerful machine will never have time to compute. We also rediscover the following result of Sergei Vorobyov: the complexity of an algorithm, deciding whether a tree constraint without free variables is true, cannot be bounded above by a function obtained from finite composition of simple functions including exponentiation. Finally, taking advantage of the fact that we have at our disposal an algorithm for solving such constraints in all their generalities, we produce a set of benchmarks for separating feasible examples from purely speculative ones. Among others we notice that it is possible to solve a constraint of 5000 symbols involving 160 alternating quantifiers

Expressiveness of Full First Order Constraints in the Algebra of Finite or Infinite Trees

International audienceWe are interested in the expressiveness of constraints represented by general first order formulae, with equality as unique relational symbol and functional symbols taken from an infinite set F. The chosen domain is the set of trees whose nodes, in possibly infinite number, are labeled by elements of F. The operation linked to each element f of F is the mapping , where b is the tree whose initial node is labeled f and whose sequence of daughters is . We first consider constraints involving long alternated sequences of quantifiers . We show how to express winning positions of two-person games with such constraints and apply our results to two examples. We then construct a family of strongly expressive constraints, inspired by a constructive proof of a complexity result by Pawel Mielniczuk. This family involves the huge number, obtained by evaluating top down a power tower of 2's, of height k. With elements of this family, of sizes at most proportional to k, we define a finite tree having nodes, and we express the result of a Prolog machine executing at most instructions. By replacing the Prolog machine by a Turing machine we rediscover the following result of Sergei Vorobyov: the complexity of an algorithm, deciding whether a constraint without free variables is true, cannot be bounded above by a function obtained by finite composition of elementary functions including exponentiation. Finally, taking advantage of the fact that we have at our disposal an algorithm for solving such constraints in all their generality, we produce a set of benchmarks for separating feasible examples from purely speculative ones. Among others we solve constraints involving alternated sequences of more than 160 quantifiers

Logics for Unranked Trees: An Overview

Labeled unranked trees are used as a model of XML documents, and logical languages for them have been studied actively over the past several years. Such logics have different purposes: some are better suited for extracting data, some for expressing navigational properties, and some make it easy to relate complex properties of trees to the existence of tree automata for those properties. Furthermore, logics differ significantly in their model-checking properties, their automata models, and their behavior on ordered and unordered trees. In this paper we present a survey of logics for unranked trees

Decomposable Theories

We present in this paper a general algorithm for solving first-order formulas in particular theories called "decomposable theories". First of all, using special quantifiers, we give a formal characterization of decomposable theories and show some of their properties. Then, we present a general algorithm for solving first-order formulas in any decomposable theory "T". The algorithm is given in the form of five rewriting rules. It transforms a first-order formula "P", which can possibly contain free variables, into a conjunction "Q" of solved formulas easily transformable into a Boolean combination of existentially quantified conjunctions of atomic formulas. In particular, if "P" has no free variables then "Q" is either the formula "true" or "false". The correctness of our algorithm proves the completeness of the decomposable theories. Finally, we show that the theory "Tr" of finite or infinite trees is a decomposable theory and give some benchmarks realized by an implementation of our algorithm, solving formulas on two-partner games in "Tr" with more than 160 nested alternated quantifiers

Priorities Without Priorities: Representing Preemption in Psi-Calculi

Psi-calculi is a parametric framework for extensions of the pi-calculus with data terms and arbitrary logics. In this framework there is no direct way to represent action priorities, where an action can execute only if all other enabled actions have lower priority. We here demonstrate that the psi-calculi parameters can be chosen such that the effect of action priorities can be encoded. To accomplish this we define an extension of psi-calculi with action priorities, and show that for every calculus in the extended framework there is a corresponding ordinary psi-calculus, without priorities, and a translation between them that satisfies strong operational correspondence. This is a significantly stronger result than for most encodings between process calculi in the literature. We also formally prove in Nominal Isabelle that the standard congruence and structural laws about strong bisimulation hold in psi-calculi extended with priorities.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2014, arXiv:1408.127

Introduction to the ISO specification language LOTOS

LOTOS is a specification language that has been specifically developed for the formal description of the OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) architecture, although it is applicable to distributed, concurrent systems in general. In LOTOS a system is seen as a set of processes which interact and exchange data with each other and with their environment. LOTOS is expected to become an ISO international standard by 1988

Deciding the Borel complexity of regular tree languages

We show that it is decidable whether a given a regular tree language belongs to the class ${\bf \Delta^0_2}$ of the Borel hierarchy, or equivalently whether the Wadge degree of a regular tree language is countable.Comment: 15 pages, 2 figure