Evaluating the semantic web: a task-based approach

The increased availability of online knowledge has led to the design of several algorithms that solve a variety of tasks by harvesting the Semantic Web, i.e. by dynamically selecting and exploring a multitude of online ontologies. Our hypothesis is that the performance of such novel algorithms implicity provides an insight into the quality of the used ontologies and thus opens the way to a task-based evaluation of the Semantic Web. We have investigated this hypothesis by studying the lessons learnt about online ontologies when used to solve three tasks: ontology matching, folksonomy enrichment, and word sense disambiguation. Our analysis leads to a suit of conclusions about the status of the Semantic Web, which highlight a number of strengths and weaknesses of the semantic information available online and complement the findings of other analysis of the Semantic Web landscape

HIERARCHICAL LEARNING OF DISCRIMINATIVE FEATURES AND CLASSIFIERS FOR LARGE-SCALE VISUAL RECOGNITION

Enabling computers to recognize objects present in images has been a long standing but tremendously challenging problem in the field of computer vision for decades. Beyond the difficulties resulting from huge appearance variations, large-scale visual recognition poses unprecedented challenges when the number of visual categories being considered becomes thousands, and the amount of images increases to millions. This dissertation contributes to addressing a number of the challenging issues in large-scale visual recognition. First, we develop an automatic image-text alignment method to collect massive amounts of labeled images from the Web for training visual concept classifiers. Specif- ically, we first crawl a large number of cross-media Web pages containing Web images and their auxiliary texts, and then segment them into a collection of image-text pairs. We then show that near-duplicate image clustering according to visual similarity can significantly reduce the uncertainty on the relatedness of Web images’ semantics to their auxiliary text terms or phrases. Finally, we empirically demonstrate that ran- dom walk over a newly proposed phrase correlation network can help to achieve more precise image-text alignment by refining the relevance scores between Web images and their auxiliary text terms. Second, we propose a visual tree model to reduce the computational complexity of a large-scale visual recognition system by hierarchically organizing and learning the classifiers for a large number of visual categories in a tree structure. Compared to previous tree models, such as the label tree, our visual tree model does not require training a huge amount of classifiers in advance which is computationally expensive. However, we experimentally show that the proposed visual tree achieves results that are comparable or even better to other tree models in terms of recognition accuracy and efficiency. Third, we present a joint dictionary learning (JDL) algorithm which exploits the inter-category visual correlations to learn more discriminative dictionaries for image content representation. Given a group of visually correlated categories, JDL simul- taneously learns one common dictionary and multiple category-specific dictionaries to explicitly separate the shared visual atoms from the category-specific ones. We accordingly develop three classification schemes to make full use of the dictionaries learned by JDL for visual content representation in the task of image categoriza- tion. Experiments on two image data sets which respectively contain 17 and 1,000 categories demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. In the last part of the dissertation, we develop a novel data-driven algorithm to quantitatively characterize the semantic gaps of different visual concepts for learning complexity estimation and inference model selection. The semantic gaps are estimated directly in the visual feature space since the visual feature space is the common space for concept classifier training and automatic concept detection. We show that the quantitative characterization of the semantic gaps helps to automatically select more effective inference models for classifier training, which further improves the recognition accuracy rates

XML Matchers: approaches and challenges

Schema Matching, i.e. the process of discovering semantic correspondences between concepts adopted in different data source schemas, has been a key topic in Database and Artificial Intelligence research areas for many years. In the past, it was largely investigated especially for classical database models (e.g., E/R schemas, relational databases, etc.). However, in the latest years, the widespread adoption of XML in the most disparate application fields pushed a growing number of researchers to design XML-specific Schema Matching approaches, called XML Matchers, aiming at finding semantic matchings between concepts defined in DTDs and XSDs. XML Matchers do not just take well-known techniques originally designed for other data models and apply them on DTDs/XSDs, but they exploit specific XML features (e.g., the hierarchical structure of a DTD/XSD) to improve the performance of the Schema Matching process. The design of XML Matchers is currently a well-established research area. The main goal of this paper is to provide a detailed description and classification of XML Matchers. We first describe to what extent the specificities of DTDs/XSDs impact on the Schema Matching task. Then we introduce a template, called XML Matcher Template, that describes the main components of an XML Matcher, their role and behavior. We illustrate how each of these components has been implemented in some popular XML Matchers. We consider our XML Matcher Template as the baseline for objectively comparing approaches that, at first glance, might appear as unrelated. The introduction of this template can be useful in the design of future XML Matchers. Finally, we analyze commercial tools implementing XML Matchers and introduce two challenging issues strictly related to this topic, namely XML source clustering and uncertainty management in XML Matchers.Comment: 34 pages, 8 tables, 7 figure

Similarity of Semantic Relations

There are at least two kinds of similarity. Relational similarity is correspondence between relations, in contrast with attributional similarity, which is correspondence between attributes. When two words have a high degree of attributional similarity, we call them synonyms. When two pairs of words have a high degree of relational similarity, we say that their relations are analogous. For example, the word pair mason:stone is analogous to the pair carpenter:wood. This paper introduces Latent Relational Analysis (LRA), a method for measuring relational similarity. LRA has potential applications in many areas, including information extraction, word sense disambiguation, and information retrieval. Recently the Vector Space Model (VSM) of information retrieval has been adapted to measuring relational similarity, achieving a score of 47% on a collection of 374 college-level multiple-choice word analogy questions. In the VSM approach, the relation between a pair of words is characterized by a vector of frequencies of predefined patterns in a large corpus. LRA extends the VSM approach in three ways: (1) the patterns are derived automatically from the corpus, (2) the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is used to smooth the frequency data, and (3) automatically generated synonyms are used to explore variations of the word pairs. LRA achieves 56% on the 374 analogy questions, statistically equivalent to the average human score of 57%. On the related problem of classifying semantic relations, LRA achieves similar gains over the VSM