DESIGNING A HIGH ENGAGED AND PERFORMING ORGANISATION WITH A FOCUS ON DEVELOPING LEADERSHIP, STRUCTURE, AND NON-MONETARY REWARDS TO ENHANCE EMPLOYEE WORK ENGAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE JOB PERFORMANCE: A CASE STUDY AT AA GROUP CO., LTD, MANDALAY, MYANMAR

This action research paper emphasizes the change in organisation design elements consisting of leadership, structure, and non-monetary rewards enhancing employee work engagement and employee job performance at AA Group Co., Ltd; a family-owned gold business group located in Mandalay division, Myanmar. The company has 450 manpower and is planning to develop its human capitals and restructure its business towards IPO. The survey research and ODIs are targeted employees working from different management levels at the focal company. The actual quantitative sample size is determined as 124 and the actual qualitative sample size is determined as 15. This research utilizes both quantitative and qualitative research methods within its action research framework in order to analyse and compare the situation at the focal company in both pre-ODI and post-ODI stages. This research paper accesses the initial impacts of ODIs on the leadership, structure, non-monetary rewards, employee work engagement, and employee job performance at AA Group Co., Ltd. Based on theoretical, conceptual frameworks, ODI results, there is an improvement of desired variables at AA Group Co., Ltd. This research paper also proposes a three-year logical framework (action plan) to have a sustainable development on the recent improvement of tested variables at AA Group Co., Ltd

Improving the effectiveness of feedback by use of assessed reflections and withholding of grades

We wished to improve levels of student engagement with feedback within the context of our postgraduate masters-level programme, and therefore evaluated the use of two interventions: assessed reflections on feedback and grade-withholding. In questionnaires students reported more engagement with feedback after the interventions, with 77% in favour of using reflections, though only 57% favoured grade-withholding, with feelings of frustration and anxiety about the grade cited as factors. Overall class grades improved over the two years in which reflections were used, with the greatest gains made by students generating the most insightful reflections. Additional gains in the second year of intervention may have been attributable to improved implementation or the introduction of grade-withholding, or a combination of both. Overall we demonstrated clear improvement in feedback utilisation and achievement associated with our interventions

City Year: Year 1 Evaluation Report, 2013-2014

City Year is an education-focused nonprofit organization that partners with high needs public schools to enhance the quality of the learning environment in the areas of attendance, behavior, and course performance. This is achieved by deploying teams of City Year corps members to the schools. The expectation is that students who receive support from City Year corps members in the areas of English, math, attendance, and behavior will show growth in their academic and behavioral outcomes. With funding from the William Penn Foundation, City Year is being implemented in 11 high needs public schools within The School District of Philadelphia (SDP or District); targeted support is provided to at-risk students in grades 6 to 9. The Office of Research and Evaluation (ORE) is currently evaluating City Year's effectiveness in meeting the above goals for the 2013-2014 school year (SY) – Year 1— and extending into the 2014-2015 SY – Year 2

Developing e-assessment using the quiz activity within Moodle: empowering student learning

Using formative assessment within Moodle has been shown to encourage self-directed learning (Bromham & Oprandi, 2006). Our experience of using formative assessment quizzes as stand alone entities, as well as within Moodle lessons, has been used to introduce Moodle assessment quizzes over the past year in Level 1 and Level 2 Life Sciences courses. This experience has been distilled to inform the content of this workshop. Some advantages of incorporating assessments in the form of Moodle quizzes are that they allow for quick, reproducible and flexible assessment with a relatively small initial set-up cost, and substantial long-term staff and administration savings. One significant advantage is that staff and room pressures can be reduced as students can attempt the assessment at a time and location of their choice within a specified time period. This flexibility can help to reduce student stress associated with completion of a continuous assessment for their course. It is also a relatively simple process to account for students entitled to extra time during assessments. Providing clear instructions beforehand and at the start of the quiz ensures that students understand their responsibilities for completion of this assessment and ultimately the course. There are some disadvantages and limitations to the system as it currently exists, for example there is the perceived ability for students to “cheat” by completing the assessment as a group, accessing books and the internet. Strategies to account for these can be put in place and will be discussed in detail during the workshop. This workshop aims to take the participants through the initial set up of a quiz, highlighting the various question types and how these can be used to create a challenging assessment that can be quickly graded and prove informative for staff and course development. Reference Bromham L. & Oprandi P. (2006) Evolution online: developing active and blended learning by using a virtual learning environment in an introductory biology course. Journal of Biological Education 41 (1): 21-25