Exploiting Inter- and Intra-Memory Asymmetries for Data Mapping in Hybrid Tiered-Memories

Modern computing systems are embracing hybrid memory comprising of DRAM and non-volatile memory (NVM) to combine the best properties of both memory technologies, achieving low latency, high reliability, and high density. A prominent characteristic of DRAM-NVM hybrid memory is that it has NVM access latency much higher than DRAM access latency. We call this inter-memory asymmetry. We observe that parasitic components on a long bitline are a major source of high latency in both DRAM and NVM, and a significant factor contributing to high-voltage operations in NVM, which impact their reliability. We propose an architectural change, where each long bitline in DRAM and NVM is split into two segments by an isolation transistor. One segment can be accessed with lower latency and operating voltage than the other. By introducing tiers, we enable non-uniform accesses within each memory type (which we call intra-memory asymmetry), leading to performance and reliability trade-offs in DRAM-NVM hybrid memory. We extend existing NVM-DRAM OS in three ways. First, we exploit both inter- and intra-memory asymmetries to allocate and migrate memory pages between the tiers in DRAM and NVM. Second, we improve the OS's page allocation decisions by predicting the access intensity of a newly-referenced memory page in a program and placing it to a matching tier during its initial allocation. This minimizes page migrations during program execution, lowering the performance overhead. Third, we propose a solution to migrate pages between the tiers of the same memory without transferring data over the memory channel, minimizing channel occupancy and improving performance. Our overall approach, which we call MNEME, to enable and exploit asymmetries in DRAM-NVM hybrid tiered memory improves both performance and reliability for both single-core and multi-programmed workloads.Comment: 15 pages, 29 figures, accepted at ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Memory Managemen

Power Management Techniques for Data Centers: A Survey

With growing use of internet and exponential growth in amount of data to be stored and processed (known as 'big data'), the size of data centers has greatly increased. This, however, has resulted in significant increase in the power consumption of the data centers. For this reason, managing power consumption of data centers has become essential. In this paper, we highlight the need of achieving energy efficiency in data centers and survey several recent architectural techniques designed for power management of data centers. We also present a classification of these techniques based on their characteristics. This paper aims to provide insights into the techniques for improving energy efficiency of data centers and encourage the designers to invent novel solutions for managing the large power dissipation of data centers.Comment: Keywords: Data Centers, Power Management, Low-power Design, Energy Efficiency, Green Computing, DVFS, Server Consolidatio

Improving the Performance and Energy Efficiency of GPGPU Computing through Adaptive Cache and Memory Management Techniques

Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAs the performance and energy efficiency requirement of GPGPUs have risen, memory management techniques of GPGPUs have improved to meet the requirements by employing hardware caches and utilizing heterogeneous memory. These techniques can improve GPGPUs by providing lower latency and higher bandwidth of the memory. However, these methods do not always guarantee improved performance and energy efficiency due to the small cache size and heterogeneity of the memory nodes. While prior works have proposed various techniques to address this issue, relatively little work has been done to investigate holistic support for memory management techniques. In this dissertation, we analyze performance pathologies and propose various techniques to improve memory management techniques. First, we investigate the effectiveness of advanced cache indexing (ACI) for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Specifically, we discuss the designs of various static and adaptive cache indexing schemes and present implementation for GPGPUs. We then quantify and analyze the effectiveness of the ACI schemes based on a cycle-accurate GPGPU simulator. Our quantitative evaluation shows that ACI schemes achieve significant performance and energy-efficiency gains over baseline conventional indexing scheme. We also analyze the performance sensitivity of ACI to key architectural parameters (i.e., capacity, associativity, and ICN bandwidth) and the cache indexing latency. We also demonstrate that ACI continues to achieve high performance in various settings. Second, we propose IACM, integrated adaptive cache management for high-performance and energy-efficient GPGPU computing. Based on the performance pathology analysis of GPGPUs, we integrate state-of-the-art adaptive cache management techniques (i.e., cache indexing, bypassing, and warp limiting) in a unified architectural framework to eliminate performance pathologies. Our quantitative evaluation demonstrates that IACM significantly improves the performance and energy efficiency of various GPGPU workloads over the baseline architecture (i.e., 98.1% and 61.9% on average, respectively) and achieves considerably higher performance than the state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 361.4% at maximum and 7.7% on average). Furthermore, IACM delivers significant performance and energy efficiency gains over the baseline GPGPU architecture even when enhanced with advanced architectural technologies (e.g., higher capacity, associativity). Third, we propose bandwidth- and latency-aware page placement (BLPP) for GPGPUs with heterogeneous memory. BLPP analyzes the characteristics of a application and determines the optimal page allocation ratio between the GPU and CPU memory. Based on the optimal page allocation ratio, BLPP dynamically allocate pages across the heterogeneous memory nodes. Our experimental results show that BLPP considerably outperforms the baseline and state-of-the-art technique (i.e., 13.4% and 16.7%) and performs similar to the static-best version (i.e., 1.2% difference), which requires extensive offline profiling.clos