196 research outputs found

    Lilotane : A Lifted SAT-based Approach to Hierarchical Planning

    Get PDF
    One of the oldest and most popular approaches to automated planning is to encode the problem at hand into a propositional formula and use a Satisfiability (SAT) solver to find a solution. In all established SAT-based approaches for Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning, grounding the problem is necessary and oftentimes introduces a combinatorial blowup in terms of the number of actions and reductions to encode. Our contribution named Lilotane (Lifted Logic for Task Networks) eliminates this issue for Totally Ordered HTN planning by directly encoding the lifted representation of the problem at hand. We lazily instantiate the problem hierarchy layer by layer and use a novel SAT encoding which allows us to defer decisions regarding method arguments to the stage of SAT solving. We show the correctness of our encoding and compare it to the best performing prior SAT encoding in a worst-case analysis. Empirical evaluations confirm that Lilotane outperforms established SAT-based approaches, often by orders of magnitude, produces much smaller formulae on average, and compares favorably to other state-of-the-art HTN planners regarding robustness and plan quality. In the International Planning Competition (IPC) 2020, a preliminary version of Lilotane scored the second place. We expect these considerable improvements to SAT-based HTN planning to open up new perspectives for SAT-based approaches in related problem classes

    Progress in AI Planning Research and Applications

    Get PDF
    Planning has made significant progress since its inception in the 1970s, in terms both of the efficiency and sophistication of its algorithms and representations and its potential for application to real problems. In this paper we sketch the foundations of planning as a sub-field of Artificial Intelligence and the history of its development over the past three decades. Then some of the recent achievements within the field are discussed and provided some experimental data demonstrating the progress that has been made in the application of general planners to realistic and complex problems. The paper concludes by identifying some of the open issues that remain as important challenges for future research in planning

    Raffinement des intentions

    Get PDF
    Le rƩsumƩ en franƧais n'a pas ƩtƩ communiquƩ par l'auteur.Le rƩsumƩ en anglais n'a pas ƩtƩ communiquƩ par l'auteur

    GoCo: planning expressive commitment protocols

    Get PDF
    Acknowledgements We gratefully thank those who shared their code with us. Special thanks to Ugur Kuter. We thank the anonymous reviewers, and also acknowledge with gratitude the reviewers at ProMASā€™11, AAMASā€™13, AAAIā€™13, and AAMASā€™15, where preliminary parts of this work appeared. FM thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientĆ­fico e TecnolĆ³gico (CNPq) for the support within process numbers 306864/2013-4 under the PQ fellowship and 482156/2013-9 under the Universal project programs. NYS acknowledges support of the AUB University Research Board Grant Number 102853 and the OSB Grant OFFER_C1_2013_2014.Peer reviewe

    Search Complexities for HTN Planning

    Full text link

    Temporally Extended Goal Recognition in Fully Observable Non-Deterministic Domain Models

    Get PDF
    arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2103.11692Preprin

    Pruning Techniques for Lied SAT-Based Hierarchical Planning

    Get PDF
    • ā€¦
    corecore