23,181 research outputs found
The Impact of Crowds on News Engagement: A Reddit Case Study
Today, users are reading the news through social platforms. These platforms
are built to facilitate crowd engagement, but not necessarily disseminate
useful news to inform the masses. Hence, the news that is highly engaged with
may not be the news that best informs. While predicting news popularity has
been well studied, it has not been studied in the context of crowd
manipulations. In this paper, we provide some preliminary results to a longer
term project on crowd and platform manipulations of news and news popularity.
In particular, we choose to study known features for predicting news popularity
and how those features may change on reddit.com, a social platform used
commonly for news aggregation. Along with this, we explore ways in which users
can alter the perception of news through changing the title of an article. We
find that news on reddit is predictable using previously studied sentiment and
content features and that posts with titles changed by reddit users tend to be
more popular than posts with the original article title.Comment: Published at The 2nd International Workshop on News and Public
Opinion at ICWSM 201
Collective emotions online and their influence on community life
E-communities, social groups interacting online, have recently become an
object of interdisciplinary research. As with face-to-face meetings, Internet
exchanges may not only include factual information but also emotional
information - how participants feel about the subject discussed or other group
members. Emotions are known to be important in affecting interaction partners
in offline communication in many ways. Could emotions in Internet exchanges
affect others and systematically influence quantitative and qualitative aspects
of the trajectory of e-communities? The development of automatic sentiment
analysis has made large scale emotion detection and analysis possible using
text messages collected from the web. It is not clear if emotions in
e-communities primarily derive from individual group members' personalities or
if they result from intra-group interactions, and whether they influence group
activities. We show the collective character of affective phenomena on a large
scale as observed in 4 million posts downloaded from Blogs, Digg and BBC
forums. To test whether the emotions of a community member may influence the
emotions of others, posts were grouped into clusters of messages with similar
emotional valences. The frequency of long clusters was much higher than it
would be if emotions occurred at random. Distributions for cluster lengths can
be explained by preferential processes because conditional probabilities for
consecutive messages grow as a power law with cluster length. For BBC forum
threads, average discussion lengths were higher for larger values of absolute
average emotional valence in the first ten comments and the average amount of
emotion in messages fell during discussions. Our results prove that collective
emotional states can be created and modulated via Internet communication and
that emotional expressiveness is the fuel that sustains some e-communities.Comment: 23 pages including Supporting Information, accepted to PLoS ON
Quantifying the Effect of Sentiment on Information Diffusion in Social Media
Social media have become the main vehicle of information production and
consumption online. Millions of users every day log on their Facebook or
Twitter accounts to get updates and news, read about their topics of interest,
and become exposed to new opportunities and interactions. Although recent
studies suggest that the contents users produce will affect the emotions of
their readers, we still lack a rigorous understanding of the role and effects
of contents sentiment on the dynamics of information diffusion. This work aims
at quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion, to understand:
(i) whether positive conversations spread faster and/or broader than negative
ones (or vice-versa); (ii) what kind of emotions are more typical of popular
conversations on social media; and, (iii) what type of sentiment is expressed
in conversations characterized by different temporal dynamics. Our findings
show that, at the level of contents, negative messages spread faster than
positive ones, but positive ones reach larger audiences, suggesting that people
are more inclined to share and favorite positive contents, the so-called
positive bias. As for the entire conversations, we highlight how different
temporal dynamics exhibit different sentiment patterns: for example, positive
sentiment builds up for highly-anticipated events, while unexpected events are
mainly characterized by negative sentiment. Our contribution is a milestone to
understand how the emotions expressed in short texts affect their spreading in
online social ecosystems, and may help to craft effective policies and
strategies for content generation and diffusion.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figure
General Purpose Textual Sentiment Analysis and Emotion Detection Tools
Textual sentiment analysis and emotion detection consists in retrieving the
sentiment or emotion carried by a text or document. This task can be useful in
many domains: opinion mining, prediction, feedbacks, etc. However, building a
general purpose tool for doing sentiment analysis and emotion detection raises
a number of issues, theoretical issues like the dependence to the domain or to
the language but also pratical issues like the emotion representation for
interoperability. In this paper we present our sentiment/emotion analysis
tools, the way we propose to circumvent the di culties and the applications
they are used for.Comment: Workshop on Emotion and Computing (2013
- …