Modified hamiltonian algorithm for optimal lane change with application to collision avoidance

This paper deals with collision avoidance for road vehicles when operating at the limits of available friction. For collision avoidance, a typical control approach is to: (a) define a reference geometric path that avoids collision; (b) apply low-level control to perform path following. However, there are a number of limitations in this approach, which are addressed in the current paper. First, it is typically unknown whether a predefined reference path is feasible or over-conservative. Secondly, the control scheme is not well suited to avoiding a moving object, e.g. another vehicle. Further: incorrect choice of reference path may degrade performance, fast adaptation to friction change is not easy to implement and the associated low-level control allocation may be computationally intensive. In this paper we use the general nonlinear optimal control formulation, include some simplifying assumptions and base optimal control on the minimization of an underlying Hamiltonian function. A particle model is used to define an initial reference in the form of a desired global mass-center acceleration vector. Beyond that, yaw moment is taken into account for the purpose of enhancing the stability of the vehicle. The Hamiltonian function is adapted as a linear function of tyre forces and can be minimized locally for individual wheels; this significantly reduces computational workload compared to the conventional approach of forcemoment allocation. Several combinations of actuators are studied to show the general applicability of the control algorithm based on a linear Hamiltonian function. The method has the potential to be used in future vehicle control systems across a wide range of safety applications and hence improve overall vehicle agility and improve safety

Trends in vehicle motion control for automated driving on public roads

In this paper, we describe how vehicle systems and the vehicle motion control are affected by automated driving on public roads. We describe the redundancy needed for a road vehicle to meet certain safety goals. The concept of system safety as well as system solutions to fault tolerant actuation of steering and braking and the associated fault tolerant power supply is described. Notably restriction of the operational domain in case of reduced capability of the driving automation system is discussed. Further we consider path tracking, state estimation of vehicle motion control required for automated driving as well as an example of a minimum risk manoeuver and redundant steering by means of differential braking. The steering by differential braking could offer heterogeneous or dissimilar redundancy that complements the redundancy of described fault tolerant steering systems for driving automation equipped vehicles. Finally, the important topic of verification of driving automation systems is addressed

Steering control for haptic feedback and active safety functions

Steering feedback is an important element that defines driver–vehicle interaction. It strongly affects driving performance and is primarily dependent on the steering actuator\u27s control strategy. Typically, the control method is open loop, that is without any reference tracking; and its drawbacks are hardware dependent steering feedback response and attenuated driver–environment transparency. This thesis investigates a closed-loop control method for electric power assisted steering and steer-by-wire systems. The advantages of this method, compared to open loop, are better hardware impedance compensation, system independent response, explicit transparency control and direct interface to active safety functions.The closed-loop architecture, outlined in this thesis, includes a reference model, a feedback controller and a disturbance observer. The feedback controller forms the inner loop and it ensures: reference tracking, hardware impedance compensation and robustness against the coupling uncertainties. Two different causalities are studied: torque and position control. The two are objectively compared from the perspective of (uncoupled and coupled) stability, tracking performance, robustness, and transparency.The reference model forms the outer loop and defines a torque or position reference variable, depending on the causality. Different haptic feedback functions are implemented to control the following parameters: inertia, damping, Coulomb friction and transparency. Transparency control in this application is particularly novel, which is sequentially achieved. For non-transparent steering feedback, an environment model is developed such that the reference variable is a function of virtual dynamics. Consequently, the driver–steering interaction is independent from the actual environment. Whereas, for the driver–environment transparency, the environment interaction is estimated using an observer; and then the estimated signal is fed back to the reference model. Furthermore, an optimization-based transparency algorithm is proposed. This renders the closed-loop system transparent in case of environmental uncertainty, even if the initial condition is non-transparent.The steering related active safety functions can be directly realized using the closed-loop steering feedback controller. This implies, but is not limited to, an angle overlay from the vehicle motion control functions and a torque overlay from the haptic support functions.Throughout the thesis, both experimental and the theoretical findings are corroborated. This includes a real-time implementation of the torque and position control strategies. In general, it can be concluded that position control lacks performance and robustness due to high and/or varying system inertia. Though the problem is somewhat mitigated by a robust H-infinity controller, the high frequency haptic performance remains compromised. Whereas, the required objectives are simultaneously achieved using a torque controller

Automated driving and autonomous functions on road vehicles

In recent years, road vehicle automation has become an important and popular topic for research and development in both academic and industrial spheres. New developments received extensive coverage in the popular press, and it may be said that the topic has captured the public imagination. Indeed, the topic has generated interest across a wide range of academic, industry and governmental communities, well beyond vehicle engineering; these include computer science, transportation, urban planning, legal, social science and psychology. While this follows a similar surge of interest – and subsequent hiatus – of Automated Highway Systems in the 1990’s, the current level of interest is substantially greater, and current expectations are high. It is common to frame the new technologies under the banner of “self-driving cars” – robotic systems potentially taking over the entire role of the human driver, a capability that does not fully exist at present. However, this single vision leads one to ignore the existing range of automated systems that are both feasible and useful. Recent developments are underpinned by substantial and long-term trends in “computerisation” of the automobile, with developments in sensors, actuators and control technologies to spur the new developments in both industry and academia. In this paper we review the evolution of the intelligent vehicle and the supporting technologies with a focus on the progress and key challenges for vehicle system dynamics. A number of relevant themes around driving automation are explored in this article, with special focus on those most relevant to the underlying vehicle system dynamics. One conclusion is that increased precision is needed in sensing and controlling vehicle motions, a trend that can mimic that of the aerospace industry, and similarly benefit from increased use of redundant by-wire actuators

Human-Machine Interface Development For Modifying Driver Lane Change Behavior In Manual, Automated, And Shared Control Automated Driving

Rear-end crashes are common on U.S. roads. Driver assistance and automated driving technologies can reduce rear-end crashes (among other crash types as well). Braking is assumed for forward collision warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems. Braking is also used for adaptive cruise control (ACC) and in automated driving systems more generally. However, steering may be advised in an emergency if the adjacent lane is clear and braking is unlikely to avoid a collision. Steering around an obstacle when feasible also eliminates the risk of becoming the new forward collision hazard. Driver assist technology like emergency steer assist (ESA) and Level 2 or Level 3 automated driving systems might facilitate manual emergency lane changes but may require the driver to manually initiate the maneuver, something which drivers are often reluctant to do. An Human-Machine Interface (HMI) might advise the driver of a steerable path when feasible in forward collision hazard situations. Such an HMI might also advise a driver of normal lane change opportunities that can reduce travel time, increase fuel efficiency, or simply enhance the driving experience by promoting `flow.\u27 This dissertation investigated the propensity of drivers to brake only versus steer in both manual and automated driving situations that end in a high-intensity forward collision hazard. A audio-visual Field of Safe Travel (FOST) cluster display and haptic steering wheel HMI were developed to advise drivers in both discretionary and emergency situations of a lane change opportunity. The HMI was tested in a moving base simulator in manual driving, in fully autonomous driving, and in shared-control autonomous driving during a simulated highway commute that ended in an high-intensity forward collision hazard situation. Results indicated that a) driver response was affected by the nature of the automated driving (faster response in hands-on shared control versus hands-off fully autonomous driving); b) exposure to the HMI in normal lane changes both familiarized the driver with the HMI and introduced a mental set that steering was also a possibility rather than braking only; c) but that drivers used their direct vision to determine their response in the emergency event. A methodological issue related to mental set was also uncovered and resolved through screening studies. The final study brought the dissertation full-circle, comparing hands-off fully automated driving to hands-on shared control automated driving in the context of either providing some or no exposure to the developed LCA system concept. Results of the final study indicated that shared control lies somewhere between that of manual driving and hands-off fully automate driving. Benefits were also shown to exist for the LCA system concept irrespective of whether the discrete haptic profiles are included or not. The discrete haptic profiles did not statistically reliably increase response times to the FC hazard event, although they do show a trend toward decreasing response variability. This finding solidified the fact that by implementing a system for benign driving that aids in establishing a mental set to steer around an obstacle may actually be beneficial for rear-end crash scenarios. This dissertation’s contributions include a) audio-visual FOST display concepts; b) discrete haptic steering display concepts; c) a paired-comparisons scaling for urgency for haptic displays applied while driving; d) a new ``mirage scenario\u27\u27 methodology for eliciting subjective assessments in the context of a forward collision hazard, briefly presented then removed, without risk of simulator sickness, and e) a methodological lesson for others who wish to investigate semi-automated and automated driving interventions and must manage driver mental set carefully

Integrated Vehicle Stability and Power Management Controls for Electric Vehicles

An integrated vehicle controller is presented for electric vehicles using independently driven wheel motors. This topology takes an optimal control approach to enhancing a vehicle's performance, stability, and energy consumption metrics simultaneously in a unified software structure. The logical output of this algorithm is a set of re-distributed wheel torques, to create torque vectoring for stability-focused yaw rate tracking, and longitudinal biasing to modify motor load for energy savings. A real-time numerical approach to solving the optimization problem is also presented, and shown to offer benefits over a closed form analytic approach. In this, solution constraints are used to link considerations such as nonlinear motor limits, tire friction envelopes, and lower-level traction control loops. To test the efficacy of this control structure, two vehicle test platforms were constructed as retrofits of production gas SUVs for electric drive. For this, the component layout is given, followed by an explanation of the software code structure as performed in a Simulink/Carsim/dSpace environment. Results from these platforms are given, with experimental and simulation data for traction control, yaw performance tracking and drive cycle power consumption. Proven performance over a variety of maneuvers and surface conditions further demonstrate the controller's stability and suitability for mass production.1 yea

Torque vectoring to maximize straight-line efficiency in an all-electric vehicle with independent rear motor control

BEVs are a critical pathway towards achieving energy independence and meeting greenhouse and pollutant gas reduction goals in the current and future transportation sector [1]. Automotive manufacturers are increasingly investing in the refinement of electric vehicles as they are becoming an increasingly popular response to the global need for reduced transportation emissions. Therefore, there is a desire to extract the most fuel economy from a vehicle as possible. Some areas that manufacturers spend much effort on include minimizing the vehicle’s mass, body drag coefficient, and drag within the powertrain. When these values are defined or unchangeable, interest is driven to other areas such as investigating the control strategy of the powertrain. If two or more electric motors are present in an electric vehicle, Torque Vectoring (TV) strategies are an option to further increase the fuel economy of electric vehicles. Most of the torque vectoring strategies in literature focus exclusively on enhancing the vehicle stability and dynamics with few approaches that consider efficiency or energy consumption. The limited research on TV that addresses system efficiency have been done on a small number of vehicle architectures, such as four independent motors, and are distributing torque front/rear instead of left/right which would not induce any yaw moment. The proposed research aims to address these deficiencies in the current literature. First, by implementing an efficiency-optimized TV strategy for a rear-wheel drive, dual-motor vehicle under straight-line driving as would be experienced in during the EPA drive cycle tests. Second, by characterizing the yaw moment and implementing strategies to mitigate any undesired yaw motion. The application of the proposed research directly impacts dual-motor architectures in a way that improves overall efficiency which also drives an increase in fuel economy. Increased fuel economy increases the range of electric vehicles and reduces the energy demand from an electrical source that may be of non-renewable origin such as coal

Performance and Safety Enhancement Strategies in Vehicle Dynamics and Ground Contact

Recent trends in vehicle engineering are testament to the great efforts that scientists and industries have made to seek solutions to enhance both the performance and safety of vehicular systems. This Special Issue aims to contribute to the study of modern vehicle dynamics, attracting recent experimental and in-simulation advances that are the basis for current technological growth and future mobility. The area involves research, studies, and projects derived from vehicle dynamics that aim to enhance vehicle performance in terms of handling, comfort, and adherence, and to examine safety optimization in the emerging contexts of smart, connected, and autonomous driving.This Special Issue focuses on new findings in the following topics:(1) Experimental and modelling activities that aim to investigate interaction phenomena from the macroscale, analyzing vehicle data, to the microscale, accounting for local contact mechanics; (2) Control strategies focused on vehicle performance enhancement, in terms of handling/grip, comfort and safety for passengers, motorsports, and future mobility scenarios; (3) Innovative technologies to improve the safety and performance of the vehicle and its subsystems; (4) Identification of vehicle and tire/wheel model parameters and status with innovative methodologies and algorithms; (5) Implementation of real-time software, logics, and models in onboard architectures and driving simulators; (6) Studies and analyses oriented toward the correlation among the factors affecting vehicle performance and safety; (7) Application use cases in road and off-road vehicles, e-bikes, motorcycles, buses, trucks, etc

Advances in Mechanical Systems Dynamics 2020

The fundamentals of mechanical system dynamics were established before the beginning of the industrial era. The 18th century was a very important time for science and was characterized by the development of classical mechanics. This development progressed in the 19th century, and new, important applications related to industrialization were found and studied. The development of computers in the 20th century revolutionized mechanical system dynamics owing to the development of numerical simulation. We are now in the presence of the fourth industrial revolution. Mechanical systems are increasingly integrated with electrical, fluidic, and electronic systems, and the industrial environment has become characterized by the cyber-physical systems of industry 4.0. Within this framework, the status-of-the-art has become represented by integrated mechanical systems and supported by accurate dynamic models able to predict their dynamic behavior. Therefore, mechanical systems dynamics will play a central role in forthcoming years. This Special Issue aims to disseminate the latest research findings and ideas in the field of mechanical systems dynamics, with particular emphasis on novel trends and applications