6 research outputs found
Embeddings of Schatten Norms with Applications to Data Streams
A_poly(nd) in R^{n x d}, suppose we want to construct a linear map L such that L(A_i) in R^{n\u27 x d\u27} for each i, where n\u27 = 1. Then how large do n\u27 and d\u27 need to be as a function of D_{p,q}?
We nearly resolve this question for every p, q >= 1, for the case where L(A_i) can be expressed as R*A_i*S, where R and S are arbitrary matrices that are allowed to depend on A_1, ... ,A_t, that is, L(A_i) can be implemented by left and right matrix multiplication. Namely, for every p, q >= 1, we provide nearly matching upper and lower bounds on the size of n\u27 and d\u27 as a function of D_{p,q}. Importantly, our upper bounds are oblivious, meaning that R and S do not depend on the A_i, while our lower bounds hold even if R and S depend on the A_i. As an application of our upper bounds, we answer a recent open question of Blasiok et al. about space-approximation trade-offs for the Schatten 1-norm, showing in a data stream it is possible to estimate the Schatten-1 norm up to a factor of D >= 1 using O~(min(n, d)^2/D^4) space
Impossibility of dimension reduction in the nuclear norm
Let (the Schatten--von Neumann trace class) denote the Banach
space of all compact linear operators whose nuclear norm
is finite, where
are the singular values of . We prove that
for arbitrarily large there exists a subset
with that cannot be
embedded with bi-Lipschitz distortion into any -dimensional
linear subspace of . is not even a -Lipschitz
quotient of any subset of any -dimensional linear subspace of
. Thus, does not admit a dimension reduction
result \'a la Johnson and Lindenstrauss (1984), which complements the work of
Harrow, Montanaro and Short (2011) on the limitations of quantum dimension
reduction under the assumption that the embedding into low dimensions is a
quantum channel. Such a statement was previously known with
replaced by the Banach space of absolutely summable sequences via the
work of Brinkman and Charikar (2003). In fact, the above set can
be taken to be the same set as the one that Brinkman and Charikar considered,
viewed as a collection of diagonal matrices in . The challenge is
to demonstrate that cannot be faithfully realized in an arbitrary
low-dimensional subspace of , while Brinkman and Charikar
obtained such an assertion only for subspaces of that consist of
diagonal operators (i.e., subspaces of ). We establish this by proving
that the Markov 2-convexity constant of any finite dimensional linear subspace
of is at most a universal constant multiple of