1,002 research outputs found
Efficient Micro-Mobility using Intra-domain Multicast-based Mechanisms (M&M)
One of the most important metrics in the design of IP mobility protocols is
the handover performance. The current Mobile IP (MIP) standard has been shown
to exhibit poor handover performance. Most other work attempts to modify MIP to
slightly improve its efficiency, while others propose complex techniques to
replace MIP. Rather than taking these approaches, we instead propose a new
architecture for providing efficient and smooth handover, while being able to
co-exist and inter-operate with other technologies. Specifically, we propose an
intra-domain multicast-based mobility architecture, where a visiting mobile is
assigned a multicast address to use while moving within a domain. Efficient
handover is achieved using standard multicast join/prune mechanisms. Two
approaches are proposed and contrasted. The first introduces the concept
proxy-based mobility, while the other uses algorithmic mapping to obtain the
multicast address of visiting mobiles. We show that the algorithmic mapping
approach has several advantages over the proxy approach, and provide mechanisms
to support it. Network simulation (using NS-2) is used to evaluate our scheme
and compare it to other routing-based micro-mobility schemes - CIP and HAWAII.
The proactive handover results show that both M&M and CIP shows low handoff
delay and packet reordering depth as compared to HAWAII. The reason for M&M's
comparable performance with CIP is that both use bi-cast in proactive handover.
The M&M, however, handles multiple border routers in a domain, where CIP fails.
We also provide a handover algorithm leveraging the proactive path setup
capability of M&M, which is expected to outperform CIP in case of reactive
handover.Comment: 12 pages, 11 figure
Mobile IP: state of the art report
Due to roaming, a mobile device may change its network attachment each time it moves to a new link. This might cause a disruption for the Internet data packets that have to reach the mobile node. Mobile IP is a protocol, developed by the Mobile IP Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) working group, that is able to inform the network about this change in network attachment such that the Internet data packets will be delivered in a seamless way to the new point of attachment. This document presents current developments and research activities in the Mobile IP area
Separation Framework: An Enabler for Cooperative and D2D Communication for Future 5G Networks
Soaring capacity and coverage demands dictate that future cellular networks
need to soon migrate towards ultra-dense networks. However, network
densification comes with a host of challenges that include compromised energy
efficiency, complex interference management, cumbersome mobility management,
burdensome signaling overheads and higher backhaul costs. Interestingly, most
of the problems, that beleaguer network densification, stem from legacy
networks' one common feature i.e., tight coupling between the control and data
planes regardless of their degree of heterogeneity and cell density.
Consequently, in wake of 5G, control and data planes separation architecture
(SARC) has recently been conceived as a promising paradigm that has potential
to address most of aforementioned challenges. In this article, we review
various proposals that have been presented in literature so far to enable SARC.
More specifically, we analyze how and to what degree various SARC proposals
address the four main challenges in network densification namely: energy
efficiency, system level capacity maximization, interference management and
mobility management. We then focus on two salient features of future cellular
networks that have not yet been adapted in legacy networks at wide scale and
thus remain a hallmark of 5G, i.e., coordinated multipoint (CoMP), and
device-to-device (D2D) communications. After providing necessary background on
CoMP and D2D, we analyze how SARC can particularly act as a major enabler for
CoMP and D2D in context of 5G. This article thus serves as both a tutorial as
well as an up to date survey on SARC, CoMP and D2D. Most importantly, the
article provides an extensive outlook of challenges and opportunities that lie
at the crossroads of these three mutually entangled emerging technologies.Comment: 28 pages, 11 figures, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 201
Hybrid CIP/M&M for micro-mobility management under the multilayer wireless network
[[abstract]]We reference the EVOLUTE [1] (Information Society Technologies, 1ST project) that mingles Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) with Mobile IP (MIP) to support macro-mobility management and provide seamless multimedia services for roaming users.
In the part of micro-mobility, we utilize Multicast-based mobility (M&M) to assist with Cellular IP (CIP) infrastructure. They cooperate not only provide fast handoff and deal with various kinds of handoff, but also suit the macro-mobility management (proposed by Evolutes) to support real time and non-real time data flows.[[sponsorship]]IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Distributed Processing (TCDP); Tamkung University[[notice]]補ćŁĺ®Śç•˘[[conferencetype]]ĺś‹éš›[[conferencetkucampus]]ć·ˇć°´ć ˇĺś’[[conferencedate]]20050328~20050330[[booktype]]紙本[[iscallforpapers]]Y[[conferencelocation]]臺北縣, 臺
Recommended from our members
Generic Models for Mobility Management in Next Generation Networks
In the network community different mobility management techniques have been proposed over the years. However, many of these techniques share a surprisingly high number of similarities. In this technical report we analyze and evaluate the most relevant mobility management techniques, pointing out differences and similarities. For macro-mobility we consider Mobile IP (MIP), the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and mobility management techniques typical of a GSM network; for micro-mobility we describe and analyze several protocols such as: Hierarchical MIP, TeleMIP, IDMP, Cellular IP and HAWAII
Core based tree multicast (M-CBT) approach in supporting mobility
IP multicasting provides a mechanism for faster handoff support than Mobile IP. Coupled with its location independent addressing, multicasting is a viable alternative to support mobility in the Internet. This paper continues research into using IP multicasting in mobility. Our proposed scheme looks at enabling a mobile node to initiate two way communications with a corresponding node on a shared multicast tree. We use as much of the existing Internet architecture as possible by making the base station a member of the multicast group. The mobile is not directly connected to the tree but goes through the base station to send and receive packets. This paper explains the differences and advantages of our proposed scheme compared with other multicast based mobility schemes and Mobile IP
A Framework of Cooperating Agents Hierarchies for Local-Area Mobility Support
Host mobility creates a routing problem in the Internet, where an IP address reflects the network\u27s point of attachment. Mobile IP, relying on a mapping between a home address and a care-of address, and a home registration process, is widely accepted as a solution for the host mobility problem in wide-area mobility scenarios. However, its home registration requirement, upon each change of point of attachment, makes it unsuitable to handle local-area mobility, resulting in large handoff latencies, increased packet loss, and disrupted services. In this dissertation, we introduce a local-area mobility support framework for IPv4 based on the deployment of multiple cooperating mobility agents hierarchies in the foreign domain. First, we introduce a hierarchy model offering a backward compatible mode to service legacy mobile hosts, unaware of local-area mobility extensions. Second, for intra-hierarchy handoffs, we identify several design deficiencies within the current Mobile IP hierarchy extension proposal, and present an enhanced regional registration framework for local handoffs that encompasses a replay protection identification value dissemination mechanism. In addition, we present two novel registration frameworks for home registrations involving local handoffs, in which we identify the dual nature of such registrations, and attempt to emphasize the local handoff aspect. One technique, maintains tunneling of data packets to the MH (Mobile Host) through an old path until a home registration reply is received to set up the new path. In contrast, the other technique adopts a more proactive bold approach in switching immediately to the new path resulting in a reduction of the handoff latency. Third, for inter-hierarchy handoffs, we present a scalable, configurable, and cooperation based framework between mobility agents hierarchies to reduce the handoffs latencies. An attempt is made to exploit the expected network proximity between hierarchies within the foreign domain, and maintain a mobile host\u27s home-registered care-of address unchanged while within the same foreign domain. In addition, the involved registration signaling design requires a reduced number of security associations between mobility agents belonging to different hierarchies, and copes with the fact that the mobile host\u27s home-registered care-of address might not be reachable
- …