Efficient Culpably Sound NIZK Shuffle Argument without Random Oracles

One way to guarantee security against malicious voting servers is to use NIZK shuffle arguments. Up to now, only two NIZK shuffle arguments in the CRS model have been proposed. Both arguments are relatively inefficient compared to known random oracle based arguments. We propose a new, more efficient, shuffle argument in the CRS model. Importantly, its online prover\u27s computational complexity is dominated by only two $(n + 1)$-wide multi-exponentiations, where $n$ is the number of ciphertexts. Compared to the previously fastest argument by Lipmaa and Zhang, it satisfies a stronger notion of soundness

Efektiivsed mitteinteraktiivsed nullteadmusprotokollid referentssõne mudelis

Väitekirja elektrooniline versioon ei sisalda publikatsioone.Koos digitaalse ajastu võidukäiguga on interneti vahendusel võimalik sooritada üha ulmelisemana näivaid tegevusi. Täielikule krüpteeringule ehitatud mobiilsed rakendused, nagu näiteks WhatsApp, suudavad tagada, et kõne või sõnum jõuaksid üksnes õige adressaadini. Enamik pangasüsteeme garanteerivad TLS protokolli kasutades, et arvete maksmisel ja ülekannete tegemisel poleks nende andmeid kellelgi võimalik lugeda ega muuta. Mõned riigid pakuvad võimalust elektroonilisel teel hääletada (näiteks Eesti) või referendumeid läbi viia (näiteks Šveits), tagades sealjuures traditsioonilise paberhääletuse tasemel turvalisuse kriteeriumid. Kõik eelnevalt kirjeldatud tegevused vajavad kasutajate turvalisuse tagamiseks krüptograafilist protokolli. Tegelikkuses ei saa me kunagi eeldada, et kõik protokolli osapooled järgivad protokolli spetsifikatsiooni. Reaalses elus peab protokolli turvalisuseks iga osapool tõestama, et ta seda järgis ilma privaatsuse ohverdamiseta. Üks viis seda teha on nullteadmusprotokolli abil. Nullteadmusprotokoll on tõestus, mis ei lekita mingit informatsiooni peale selle, et väide on tõene. Tihti tahame, et nullteadmusprotokoll oleks mitteinteraktiivne. Sellisel juhul piisab, kui tõestus on arvutatud ainult ühe korra ning verifitseerijatel on igal ajal võimalik seda kontrollida. On kaks peamist mudelit, mis võimaldavad mitteinteraktiivsete nullteadmusprotokollide loomist: juhusliku oraakli (JO) mudel ja referentssõne mudel. JO mudeli protokollid on väga efektiivsed, kuid mõningate piirangute tõttu eelistame referentssõne mudelit. Selles töös esitleme kolme stsenaariumit, milles mitteinteraktiivne nullteadmus on asjakohane: verifitseeritav arvutamine, autoriseerimine ja elektrooniline hääletamine. Igas stsenaariumis pakume välja nullteadmusprotokolli referentssõne mudelis, mis on seni efektiivseim ning võrreldava efektiivsusega protokollidega JO mudelis.In the current digital era, we can do increasingly astonishing activities remotely using only our electronic devices. Using mobile applications such as WhatsApp, we can contact someone with the guarantee, using an end-to-end encryption protocol, that only the recipient can know the conversation's contents. Most banking systems enable us to pay our bills and perform other financial transactions, and use the TLS protocol to guarantee that no one can read or modify the transaction data. Some countries provide an option to vote electronically in an election (e.g. Estonia) or referendum (e.g. Switzerland) with similar privacy guarantees to traditional paper voting. In all these activities, a cryptographic protocol is required to ensure users' privacy. In reality, some parties participating in a protocol might not act according to what was agreed in the protocol specification. Hence, for a real world protocol to be secure, we also need each party to prove that it behaves honestly, but without sacrificing privacy of its inputs. This can be done using a zero-knowledge argument: a proof by a polynomial-time prover that gives nothing else away besides its correctness. In many cases, we want a zero-knowledge argument to be non-interactive and transferable, so that it is computed only once, but can be verified by many verifiers at any future time. There are two main models that enable transferable non-interactive zero-knowledge (NIZK) arguments: the random oracle (RO) model and the common reference string (CRS) model. Protocols in the RO model are very efficient, but due to some of its limitations, we prefer working in the CRS model. In this work we provide three scenarios where NIZK arguments are relevant: verifiable computation, authorization, and electronic voting. In each scenario, we propose NIZK arguments in the CRS model that are more efficient than existing ones, and are comparable in efficiency to the best known NIZK arguments in the RO model

Optimally Sound Sigma Protocols Under DCRA

Given a well-chosen additively homomorphic cryptosystem and a $\Sigma$ protocol with a linear answer, Damgård, Fazio, and Nicolosi proposed a non-interactive designated-verifier zero knowledge argument in the registered public key model that is sound under non-standard complexity-leveraging assumptions. In 2015, Chaidos and Groth showed how to achieve the weaker yet reasonable culpable soundness notion under standard assumptions but only if the plaintext space order is prime. It makes use of $\Sigma$ protocols that satisfy what we call the \emph{optimal culpable soundness}. Unfortunately, most of the known additively homomorphic cryptosystems (like the Paillier Elgamal cryptosystem that is secure under the standard Decisional Composite Residuosity Assumption) have composite-order plaintext space. We construct optimally culpable sound $\Sigma$ protocols and thus culpably sound non-interactive designated-verifier zero knowledge protocols for NP under standard assumptions given that the least prime divisor of the plaintext space order is large

A Shuffle Argument Secure in the Generic Model

We propose a new random oracle-less NIZK shuffle argument. It has a simple structure, where the first verification equation ascertains that the prover has committed to a permutation matrix, the second verification equation ascertains that the same permutation was used to permute the ciphertexts, and the third verification equation ascertains that input ciphertexts were ``correctly\u27\u27 formed. The new argument has $3.5$ times more efficient verification than the up-to-now most efficient shuffle argument by Fauzi and Lipmaa (CT-RSA 2016). Compared to the Fauzi-Lipmaa shuffle argument, we (i) remove the use of knowledge assumptions and prove our scheme is sound in the generic bilinear group model, and (ii) prove standard soundness, instead of culpable soundness

An Efficient Pairing-Based Shuffle Argument

We construct the most efficient known pairing-based NIZK shuffle argument. It consists of three subarguments that were carefully chosen to obtain optimal efficiency of the shuffle argument: * A same-message argument based on the linear subspace QANIZK argument of Kiltz and Wee, * A (simplified) permutation matrix argument of Fauzi, Lipmaa, and Zając, * A (simplified) consistency argument of Groth and Lu. We prove the knowledge-soundness of the first two subarguments in the generic bilinear group model, and the culpable soundness of the third subargument under a KerMDH assumption. This proves the soundness of the shuffle argument. We also discuss our partially optimized implementation that allows one to prove a shuffle of $100\,000$ ciphertexts in less than a minute and verify it in less than $1.5$ minutes

A Non-Interactive Shuffle Argument With Low Trust Assumptions

A shuffle argument is a cryptographic primitive for proving correct behaviour of mix-networks without leaking any private information. Several recent constructions of non-interactive shuffle arguments avoid the random oracle model but require the public key to be trusted. We augment the most efficient argument by Fauzi et al. [Asiacrypt 2017] with a distributed key generation protocol that assures soundness of the argument if at least one party in the protocol is honest and additionally provide a key verification algorithm which guarantees zero-knowledge even if all the parties are malicious. Furthermore, we simplify their construction and improve security by using weaker assumptions while retaining roughly the same level of efficiency. We also provide an implementation to the distributed key generation protocol and the shuffle argument

Zero Knowledge Protocols and Applications

The historical goal of cryptography is to securely transmit or store a message in an insecure medium. In that era, before public key cryptography, we had two kinds of people: those who had the correct key, and those who did not. Nowadays however, we live in a complex world with equally complex goals and requirements: securely passing a note from Alice to Bob is not enough. We want Alice to use her smartphone to vote for Carol, without Bob the tallier, or anyone else learning her vote; we also want guarantees that Alice’s ballot contains a single, valid vote and we want guarantees that Bob will tally the ballots properly. This is in fact made possible because of zero knowledge protocols. This thesis presents research performed in the area of zero knowledge protocols across the following threads: we relax the assumptions necessary for the Damgard, Fazio and ˚ Nicolosi (DFN) transformation, a technique which enables one to collapse a number of three round protocols into a single message. This approach is motivated by showing how it could be used as part of a voting scheme. Then we move onto a protocol that lets us prove that a given computation (modeled as an arithmetic circuit) was performed correctly. It improves upon the state of the art in the area by significantly reducing the communication cost. A second strand of research concerns multi-user signatures, which enable a signer to sign with respect to a set of users. We give new definitions for important primitives in the area as well as efficient instantiations using zero knowledge protocols. Finally, we present two possible answers to the question posed by voting receipts. One is to maximise privacy by building a voting system that provides receipt-freeness automatically. The other is to use them to enable conventual and privacy preserving vote copying