Improving Phase Change Memory Performance with Data Content Aware Access

A prominent characteristic of write operation in Phase-Change Memory (PCM) is that its latency and energy are sensitive to the data to be written as well as the content that is overwritten. We observe that overwriting unknown memory content can incur significantly higher latency and energy compared to overwriting known all-zeros or all-ones content. This is because all-zeros or all-ones content is overwritten by programming the PCM cells only in one direction, i.e., using either SET or RESET operations, not both. In this paper, we propose data content aware PCM writes (DATACON), a new mechanism that reduces the latency and energy of PCM writes by redirecting these requests to overwrite memory locations containing all-zeros or all-ones. DATACON operates in three steps. First, it estimates how much a PCM write access would benefit from overwriting known content (e.g., all-zeros, or all-ones) by comprehensively considering the number of set bits in the data to be written, and the energy-latency trade-offs for SET and RESET operations in PCM. Second, it translates the write address to a physical address within memory that contains the best type of content to overwrite, and records this translation in a table for future accesses. We exploit data access locality in workloads to minimize the address translation overhead. Third, it re-initializes unused memory locations with known all-zeros or all-ones content in a manner that does not interfere with regular read and write accesses. DATACON overwrites unknown content only when it is absolutely necessary to do so. We evaluate DATACON with workloads from state-of-the-art machine learning applications, SPEC CPU2017, and NAS Parallel Benchmarks. Results demonstrate that DATACON significantly improves system performance and memory system energy consumption compared to the best of performance-oriented state-of-the-art techniques.Comment: 18 pages, 21 figures, accepted at ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on Memory Management (ISMM

성능과 용량 향상을 위한 적층형 메모리 구조

학위논문 (박사)-- 서울대학교 대학원 : 융합과학기술대학원 융합과학부(지능형융합시스템전공), 2019. 2. 안정호.The advance of DRAM manufacturing technology slows down, whereas the density and performance needs of DRAM continue to increase. This desire has motivated the industry to explore emerging Non-Volatile Memory (e.g., 3D XPoint) and the high-density DRAM (e.g., Managed DRAM Solution). Since such memory technologies increase the density at the cost of longer latency, lower bandwidth, or both, it is essential to use them with fast memory (e.g., conventional DRAM) to which hot pages are transferred at runtime. Nonetheless, we observe that page transfers to fast memory often block memory channels from servicing memory requests from applications for a long period. This in turn significantly increases the high-percentile response time of latency-sensitive applications. In this thesis, we propose a high-density managed DRAM architecture, dubbed 3D-XPath for applications demanding both low latency and high capacity for memory. 3D-XPath DRAM stacks conventional DRAM dies with high-density DRAM dies explored in this thesis and connects these DRAM dies with 3D-XPath. Especially, 3D-XPath allows unused memory channels to service memory requests from applications when primary channels supposed to handle the memory requests are blocked by page transfers at given moments, considerably increasing the high-percentile response time. This can also improve the throughput of applications frequently copying memory blocks between kernel and user memory spaces. Our evaluation shows that 3D-XPath DRAM decreases high-percentile response time of latency-sensitive applications by ∼30% while improving the throughput of an I/O-intensive applications by ∼39%, compared with DRAM without 3D-XPath. Recent computer systems are evolving toward the integration of more CPU cores into a single socket, which require higher memory bandwidth and capacity. Increasing the number of channels per socket is a common solution to the bandwidth demand and to better utilize these increased channels, data bus width is reduced and burst length is increased. However, this longer burst length brings increased DRAM access latency. On the memory capacity side, process scaling has been the answer for decades, but cell capacitance now limits how small a cell could be. 3D stacked memory solves this problem by stacking dies on top of other dies. We made a key observation in real multicore machine that multiple memory controllers are always not fully utilized on SPEC CPU 2006 rate benchmark. To bring these idle channels into play, we proposed memory channel sharing architecture to boost peak bandwidth of one memory channel and reduce the burst latency on 3D stacked memory. By channel sharing, the total performance on multi-programmed workloads and multi-threaded workloads improved up to respectively 4.3% and 3.6% and the average read latency reduced up to 8.22% and 10.18%.DRAM 제조 기술의 발전은 속도가 느려지는 반면 DRAM의 밀도 및 성능 요구는 계속 증가하고 있다. 이러한 요구로 인해 새로운 비 휘발성 메모리(예: 3D-XPoint) 및 고밀도 DRAM(예: Managed asymmetric latency DRAM Solution)이 등장하였다. 이러한 고밀도 메모리 기술은 긴 레이턴시, 낮은 대역폭 또는 두 가지 모두를 사용하는 방식으로 밀도를 증가시키기 때문에 성능이 좋지 않아, 핫 페이지를 고속 메모리(예: 일반 DRAM)로 스왑되는 저용량의 고속 메모리가 동시에 사용되는 것이 일반적이다. 이러한 스왑 과정에서 빠른 메모리로의 페이지 전송이 일반적인 응용프로그램의 메모리 요청을 오랫동안 처리하지 못하도록 하기 때문에, 대기 시간에 민감한 응용 프로그램의 백분위 응답 시간을 크게 증가시켜, 응답 시간의 표준 편차를 증가시킨다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위해 본 학위 논문에서는 저 지연시간 및 고용량 메모리를 요구하는 애플리케이션을 위해 3D-XPath, 즉 고밀도 관리 DRAM 아키텍처를 제안한다. 이러한 3D-톔소를 집적한 DRAM은 저속의 고밀도 DRAM 다이를 기존의 일반적인 DRAM 다이와 동시에 한 칩에 적층하고, DRAM 다이끼리는 제안하는 3D-XPath 하드웨어를 통해 연결된다. 이러한 3D-XPath는 핫 페이지 스왑이 일어나는 동안 응용프로그램의 메모리 요청을 차단하지 않고 사용량이 적은 메모리 채널로 핫 페이지 스왑을 처리 할 수 있도록 하여, 데이터 집중 응용 프로그램의 백분위 응답 시간을 개선시킨다. 또한 제안하는 하드웨어 구조를 사용하여, 추가적으로 O/S 커널과 유저 스페이스 간의 메모리 블록을 자주 복사하는 응용 프로그램의 처리량을 향상시킬 수 있다. 이러한 3D-XPath DRAM은 3D-XPath가 없는 DRAM에 비해 I/O 집약적인 응용프로그램의 처리량을 최대 39 % 향상시키면서 레이턴시에 민감한 응용 프로그램의 높은 백분위 응답 시간을 최대 30 %까지 감소시킬 수 있다. 또한 최근의 컴퓨터 시스템은 보다 많은 메모리 대역폭과 용량을 필요로하는 더 많은 CPU 코어를 단일 소켓으로 통합하는 방향으로 진화하고 있다. 이러한 소켓 당 채널 수를 늘리는 것은 대역폭 요구에 대한 일반적인 해결책이며, 최신의 DRAM 인터페이스의 발전 양상은 증가한 채널을 보다 잘 활용하기 위해 데이터 버스 폭이 감소되고 버스트 길이가 증가한다. 그러나 길어진 버스트 길이는 DRAM 액세스 대기 시간을 증가시킨다. 추가적으로 최신의 응용프로그램은 더 많은 메모리 용량을 요구하며, 미세 공정으로 메모리 용량을 증가시키는 방법론은 수십 년 동안 사용되었지만, 20 nm 이하의 미세공정에서는 더 이상 공정 미세화를 통해 메모리 밀도를 증가시키기가 어려운 상황이며, 적층형 메모리를 사용하여 용량을 증가시키는 방법을 사용한다. 이러한 상황에서, 실제 최신의 멀티코어 머신에서 SPEC CPU 2006 응용프로그램을 멀티코어에서 실행하였을 때, 항상 시스템의 모든 메모리 컨트롤러가 완전히 활용되지 않는다는 사실을 관찰했다. 이러한 유휴 채널을 사용하기 위해 하나의 메모리 채널의 피크 대역폭을 높이고 3D 스택 메모리의 버스트 대기 시간을 줄이기 위해 본 학위 논문에서는 메모리 채널 공유 아키텍처를 제안하였으며, 하드웨어 블록을 제안하였다. 이러한 채널 공유를 통해 멀티 프로그램 된 응용프로그램 및 다중 스레드 응용프로그램 성능이 각각 4.3 % 및 3.6 %로 향상되었으며 평균 읽기 대기 시간은 8.22 % 및 10.18 %로 감소하였다.Contents Abstract i Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables viii Introduction 1 1.1 3D-XPath: High-Density Managed DRAM Architecture with Cost-effective Alternative Paths for Memory Transactions 5 1.2 Boosting Bandwidth – Dynamic Channel Sharing on 3D Stacked Memory 9 1.3 Research contribution 13 1.4 Outline 14 3D-stacked Heterogeneous Memory Architecture with Cost-effective Extra Block Transfer Paths 17 2.1 Background 17 2.1.1 Heterogeneous Main Memory Systems 17 2.1.2 Specialized DRAM 19 2.1.3 3D-stacked Memory 22 2.2 HIGH-DENSITY DRAM ARCHITECTURE 27 2.2.1 Key Design Challenges 29 2.2.2 Plausible High-density DRAM Designs 33 2.3 3D-STACKED DRAM WITH ALTERNATIVE PATHS FOR MEMORY TRANSACTIONS 37 2.3.1 3D-XPath Architecture 41 2.3.2 3D-XPath Management 46 2.4 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY 52 2.5 EVALUATION 56 2.5.1 OLDI Workloads 56 2.5.2 Non-OLDI Workloads 61 2.5.3 Sensitivity Analysis 66 2.6 RELATED WORK 70 Boosting bandwidth –Dynamic Channel Sharing on 3D Stacked Memory 72 3.1 Background: Memory Operations 72 3.1.1. Memory Controller 72 3.1.2 DRAM column access sequence 73 3.2 Related Work 74 3.3. CHANNEL SHARING ENABLED MEMORY SYSTEM 76 3.3.1 Hardware Requirements 78 3.3.2 Operation Sequence 81 3.4 Analysis 87 3.4.1 Experiment Environment 87 3.4.2 Performance 88 3.4.3 Overhead 90 CONCLUSION 92 REFERENCES 94 국문초록 107Docto

IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF EMERGING MEMORY SYSTEMS

Modern main memory is primarily built using dynamic random access memory (DRAM) chips. As DRAM chip scales to higher density, there are mainly three problems that impede DRAM scalability and performance improvement. First, DRAM refresh overhead grows from negligible to severe, which limits DRAM scalability and causes performance degradation. Second, although memory capacity has increased dramatically in past decade, memory bandwidth has not kept pace with CPU performance scaling, which has led to the memory wall problem. Third, DRAM dissipates considerable power and has been reported to account for as much as 40% of the total system energy and this problem exacerbates as DRAM scales up. To address these problems, 1) we propose Rank-level Piggyback Caching (RPC) to alleviate DRAM refresh overhead by servicing memory requests and refresh operations in parallel; 2) we propose a high performance and bandwidth efficient approach, called SELF, to breaking the memory bandwidth wall by exploiting die-stacked DRAM as a part of memory; 3) we propose a cost-effective and energy-efficient architecture for hybrid memory systems composed of high bandwidth memory (HBM) and phase change memory (PCM), called Dual Role HBM (DR-HBM). In DR-HBM, hot pages are tracked at a cost-effective way and migrated to the HBM to improve performance, while cold pages are stored at the PCM to save energy

Improving the Performance and Endurance of Persistent Memory with Loose-Ordering Consistency

Persistent memory provides high-performance data persistence at main memory. Memory writes need to be performed in strict order to satisfy storage consistency requirements and enable correct recovery from system crashes. Unfortunately, adhering to such a strict order significantly degrades system performance and persistent memory endurance. This paper introduces a new mechanism, Loose-Ordering Consistency (LOC), that satisfies the ordering requirements at significantly lower performance and endurance loss. LOC consists of two key techniques. First, Eager Commit eliminates the need to perform a persistent commit record write within a transaction. We do so by ensuring that we can determine the status of all committed transactions during recovery by storing necessary metadata information statically with blocks of data written to memory. Second, Speculative Persistence relaxes the write ordering between transactions by allowing writes to be speculatively written to persistent memory. A speculative write is made visible to software only after its associated transaction commits. To enable this, our mechanism supports the tracking of committed transaction ID and multi-versioning in the CPU cache. Our evaluations show that LOC reduces the average performance overhead of memory persistence from 66.9% to 34.9% and the memory write traffic overhead from 17.1% to 3.4% on a variety of workloads.Comment: This paper has been accepted by IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed System

Re-designing Main Memory Subsystems with Emerging Monolithic 3D (M3D) Integration and Phase Change Memory Technologies

Over the past two decades, Dynamic Random-Access Memory (DRAM) has emerged as the dominant technology for implementing the main memory subsystems of all types of computing systems. However, inferring from several recent trends, computer architects in both the industry and academia have widely accepted that the density (memory capacity per chip area) and latency of DRAM based main memory subsystems cannot sufficiently scale in the future to meet the requirements of future data-centric workloads related to Artificial Intelligence (AI), Big Data, and Internet-of-Things (IoT). In fact, the achievable density and access latency in main memory subsystems presents a very fundamental trade-off. Pushing for a higher density inevitably increases access latency, and pushing for a reduced access latency often leads to a decreased density. This trade-off is so fundamental in DRAM based main memory subsystems that merely looking to re-architect DRAM subsystems cannot improve this trade-off, unless disruptive technological advancements are realized for implementing main memory subsystems. In this thesis, we focus on two key contributions to overcome the density (represented as the total chip area for the given capacity) and access latency related challenges in main memory subsystems. First, we show that the fundamental area-latency trade-offs in DRAM can be significantly improved by redesigning the DRAM cell-array structure using the emerging monolithic 3D (M3D) integration technology. A DRAM bank structure can be split across two or more M3D-integrated tiers on the same DRAM chip, to consequently be able to significantly reduce the total on-chip area occupancy of the DRAM bank and its access peripherals. This approach is fundamentally different from the well known approach of through-silicon vias (TSVs)-based 3D stacking of DRAM tiers. This is because the M3D integration based approach does not require a separate DRAM chip per tier, whereas the 3D-stacking based approach does. Our evaluation results for PARSEC benchmarks show that our designed M3D DRAM cellarray organizations can yield up to 9.56% less latency and up to 21.21% less energy-delay product (EDP), with up to 14% less DRAM die area, compared to the conventional 2D DDR4 DRAM. Second, we demonstrate a pathway for eliminating the write disturbance errors in single-level-cell PCM, thereby positioning the PCM technology, which has inherently more relaxed density and latency trade-off compared to DRAM, as a more viable option for replacing the DRAM technology. We introduce low-temperature partial-RESET operations for writing ‘0’s in PCM cells. Compared to traditional operations that write \u270\u27s in PCM cells, partial-RESET operations do not cause disturbance errors in neighboring cells during PCM writes. The overarching theme that connects the two individual contributions into this single thesis is the density versus latency argument. The existing PCM technology has 3 to 4× higher write latency compared to DRAM; nevertheless, the existing PCM technology can store 2 to 4 bits in a single cell compared to one bit per cell storage capacity of DRAM. Therefore, unlike DRAM, it becomes possible to increase the density of PCM without consequently increasing PCM latency. In other words, PCM exhibits inherently improved (more relaxed) density and latency trade-off. Thus, both of our contributions in this thesis, the first contribution of re-designing DRAM with M3D integration technology and the second contribution of making the PCM technology a more viable replacement of DRAM by eliminating the write disturbance errors in PCM, connect to the common overarching goal of improving the density and latency trade-off in main memory subsystems. In addition, we also discuss in this thesis possible future research directions that are aimed at extending the impacts of our proposed ideas so that they can transform the performance of main memory subsystems of the future

Gestión de jerarquías de memoria híbridas a nivel de sistema

Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Informática, Departamento de Arquitectura de Computadoras y Automática y de Ku Leuven, Arenberg Doctoral School, Faculty of Engineering Science, leída el 11/05/2017.In electronics and computer science, the term ‘memory’ generally refers to devices that are used to store information that we use in various appliances ranging from our PCs to all hand-held devices, smart appliances etc. Primary/main memory is used for storage systems that function at a high speed (i.e. RAM). The primary memory is often associated with addressable semiconductor memory, i.e. integrated circuits consisting of silicon-based transistors, used for example as primary memory but also other purposes in computers and other digital electronic devices. The secondary/auxiliary memory, in comparison provides program and data storage that is slower to access but offers larger capacity. Examples include external hard drives, portable flash drives, CDs, and DVDs. These devices and media must be either plugged in or inserted into a computer in order to be accessed by the system. Since secondary storage technology is not always connected to the computer, it is commonly used for backing up data. The term storage is often used to describe secondary memory. Secondary memory stores a large amount of data at lesser cost per byte than primary memory; this makes secondary storage about two orders of magnitude less expensive than primary storage. There are two main types of semiconductor memory: volatile and nonvolatile. Examples of non-volatile memory are ‘Flash’ memory (sometimes used as secondary, sometimes primary computer memory) and ROM/PROM/EPROM/EEPROM memory (used for firmware such as boot programs). Examples of volatile memory are primary memory (typically dynamic RAM, DRAM), and fast CPU cache memory (typically static RAM, SRAM, which is fast but energy-consuming and offer lower memory capacity per are a unit than DRAM). Non-volatile memory technologies in Si-based electronics date back to the 1990s. Flash memory is widely used in consumer electronic products such as cellphones and music players and NAND Flash-based solid-state disks (SSDs) are increasingly displacing hard disk drives as the primary storage device in laptops, desktops, and even data centers. The integration limit of Flash memories is approaching, and many new types of memory to replace conventional Flash memories have been proposed. The rapid increase of leakage currents in Silicon CMOS transistors with scaling poses a big challenge for the integration of SRAM memories. There is also the case of susceptibility to read/write failure with low power schemes. As a result of this, over the past decade, there has been an extensive pooling of time, resources and effort towards developing emerging memory technologies like Resistive RAM (ReRAM/RRAM), STT-MRAM, Domain Wall Memory and Phase Change Memory(PRAM). Emerging non-volatile memory technologies promise new memories to store more data at less cost than the expensive-to build silicon chips used by popular consumer gadgets including digital cameras, cell phones and portable music players. These new memory technologies combine the speed of static random-access memory (SRAM), the density of dynamic random-access memory (DRAM), and the non-volatility of Flash memory and so become very attractive as another possibility for future memory hierarchies. The research and information on these Non-Volatile Memory (NVM) technologies has matured over the last decade. These NVMs are now being explored thoroughly nowadays as viable replacements for conventional SRAM based memories even for the higher levels of the memory hierarchy. Many other new classes of emerging memory technologies such as transparent and plastic, three-dimensional(3-D), and quantum dot memory technologies have also gained tremendous popularity in recent years...En el campo de la informática, el término ‘memoria’ se refiere generalmente a dispositivos que son usados para almacenar información que posteriormente será usada en diversos dispositivos, desde computadoras personales (PC), móviles, dispositivos inteligentes, etc. La memoria principal del sistema se utiliza para almacenar los datos e instrucciones de los procesos que se encuentre en ejecución, por lo que se requiere que funcionen a alta velocidad (por ejemplo, DRAM). La memoria principal está implementada habitualmente mediante memorias semiconductoras direccionables, siendo DRAM y SRAM los principales exponentes. Por otro lado, la memoria auxiliar o secundaria proporciona almacenaje(para ficheros, por ejemplo); es más lenta pero ofrece una mayor capacidad. Ejemplos típicos de memoria secundaria son discos duros, memorias flash portables, CDs y DVDs. Debido a que estos dispositivos no necesitan estar conectados a la computadora de forma permanente, son muy utilizados para almacenar copias de seguridad. La memoria secundaria almacena una gran cantidad de datos aun coste menor por bit que la memoria principal, siendo habitualmente dos órdenes de magnitud más barata que la memoria primaria. Existen dos tipos de memorias de tipo semiconductor: volátiles y no volátiles. Ejemplos de memorias no volátiles son las memorias Flash (algunas veces usadas como memoria secundaria y otras veces como memoria principal) y memorias ROM/PROM/EPROM/EEPROM (usadas para firmware como programas de arranque). Ejemplos de memoria volátil son las memorias DRAM (RAM dinámica), actualmente la opción predominante a la hora de implementar la memoria principal, y las memorias SRAM (RAM estática) más rápida y costosa, utilizada para los diferentes niveles de cache. Las tecnologías de memorias no volátiles basadas en electrónica de silicio se remontan a la década de1990. Una variante de memoria de almacenaje por carga denominada como memoria Flash es mundialmente usada en productos electrónicos de consumo como telefonía móvil y reproductores de música mientras NAND Flash solid state disks(SSDs) están progresivamente desplazando a los dispositivos de disco duro como principal unidad de almacenamiento en computadoras portátiles, de escritorio e incluso en centros de datos. En la actualidad, hay varios factores que amenazan la actual predominancia de memorias semiconductoras basadas en cargas (capacitivas). Por un lado, se está alcanzando el límite de integración de las memorias Flash, lo que compromete su escalado en el medio plazo. Por otra parte, el fuerte incremento de las corrientes de fuga de los transistores de silicio CMOS actuales, supone un enorme desafío para la integración de memorias SRAM. Asimismo, estas memorias son cada vez más susceptibles a fallos de lectura/escritura en diseños de bajo consumo. Como resultado de estos problemas, que se agravan con cada nueva generación tecnológica, en los últimos años se han intensificado los esfuerzos para desarrollar nuevas tecnologías que reemplacen o al menos complementen a las actuales. Los transistores de efecto campo eléctrico ferroso (FeFET en sus siglas en inglés) se consideran una de las alternativas más prometedores para sustituir tanto a Flash (por su mayor densidad) como a DRAM (por su mayor velocidad), pero aún está en una fase muy inicial de su desarrollo. Hay otras tecnologías algo más maduras, en el ámbito de las memorias RAM resistivas, entre las que cabe destacar ReRAM (o RRAM), STT-RAM, Domain Wall Memory y Phase Change Memory (PRAM)...Depto. de Arquitectura de Computadores y AutomáticaFac. de InformáticaTRUEunpu