877 research outputs found
A Note on Plus-Contacts, Rectangular Duals, and Box-Orthogonal Drawings
A plus-contact representation of a planar graph is called -balanced if
for every plus shape , the number of other plus shapes incident to each
arm of is at most , where is the maximum degree
of . Although small values of have been achieved for a few subclasses of
planar graphs (e.g., - and -trees), it is unknown whether -balanced
representations with exist for arbitrary planar graphs.
In this paper we compute -balanced plus-contact representations for
all planar graphs that admit a rectangular dual. Our result implies that any
graph with a rectangular dual has a 1-bend box-orthogonal drawings such that
for each vertex , the box representing is a square of side length
.Comment: A poster related to this research appeared at the 25th International
Symposium on Graph Drawing & Network Visualization (GD 2017
On Smooth Orthogonal and Octilinear Drawings: Relations, Complexity and Kandinsky Drawings
We study two variants of the well-known orthogonal drawing model: (i) the
smooth orthogonal, and (ii) the octilinear. Both models form an extension of
the orthogonal, by supporting one additional type of edge segments (circular
arcs and diagonal segments, respectively).
For planar graphs of max-degree 4, we analyze relationships between the graph
classes that can be drawn bendless in the two models and we also prove
NP-hardness for a restricted version of the bendless drawing problem for both
models. For planar graphs of higher degree, we present an algorithm that
produces bi-monotone smooth orthogonal drawings with at most two segments per
edge, which also guarantees a linear number of edges with exactly one segment.Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2017
Orthogonal Graph Drawing with Inflexible Edges
We consider the problem of creating plane orthogonal drawings of 4-planar
graphs (planar graphs with maximum degree 4) with constraints on the number of
bends per edge. More precisely, we have a flexibility function assigning to
each edge a natural number , its flexibility. The problem
FlexDraw asks whether there exists an orthogonal drawing such that each edge
has at most bends. It is known that FlexDraw is NP-hard
if for every edge . On the other hand, FlexDraw can
be solved efficiently if and is trivial if
for every edge .
To close the gap between the NP-hardness for and the
efficient algorithm for , we investigate the
computational complexity of FlexDraw in case only few edges are inflexible
(i.e., have flexibility~). We show that for any FlexDraw
is NP-complete for instances with inflexible edges with
pairwise distance (including the case where they
induce a matching). On the other hand, we give an FPT-algorithm with running
time , where
is the time necessary to compute a maximum flow in a planar flow network with
multiple sources and sinks, and is the number of inflexible edges having at
least one endpoint of degree 4.Comment: 23 pages, 5 figure
L-Drawings of Directed Graphs
We introduce L-drawings, a novel paradigm for representing directed graphs
aiming at combining the readability features of orthogonal drawings with the
expressive power of matrix representations. In an L-drawing, vertices have
exclusive - and -coordinates and edges consist of two segments, one
exiting the source vertically and one entering the destination horizontally.
We study the problem of computing L-drawings using minimum ink. We prove its
NP-completeness and provide a heuristics based on a polynomial-time algorithm
that adds a vertex to a drawing using the minimum additional ink. We performed
an experimental analysis of the heuristics which confirms its effectiveness.Comment: 11 pages, 7 figure
On Visibility Representations of Non-planar Graphs
A rectangle visibility representation (RVR) of a graph consists of an
assignment of axis-aligned rectangles to vertices such that for every edge
there exists a horizontal or vertical line of sight between the rectangles
assigned to its endpoints. Testing whether a graph has an RVR is known to be
NP-hard. In this paper, we study the problem of finding an RVR under the
assumption that an embedding in the plane of the input graph is fixed and we
are looking for an RVR that reflects this embedding. We show that in this case
the problem can be solved in polynomial time for general embedded graphs and in
linear time for 1-plane graphs (i.e., embedded graphs having at most one
crossing per edge). The linear time algorithm uses a precise list of forbidden
configurations, which extends the set known for straight-line drawings of
1-plane graphs. These forbidden configurations can be tested for in linear
time, and so in linear time we can test whether a 1-plane graph has an RVR and
either compute such a representation or report a negative witness. Finally, we
discuss some extensions of our study to the case when the embedding is not
fixed but the RVR can have at most one crossing per edge
- âŠ