25 research outputs found
Efficiency of scalar-parameterized mechanisms
We consider the problem of allocating a fixed amount of an infinitely divisible resource among multiple
competing, fully rational users. We study the efficiency guarantees that are possible when we restrict to
mechanisms that satisfy certain scalability constraints motivated by large scale communication networks;
in particular, we restrict attention to mechanisms where users are restricted to one-dimensional strategy
spaces. We first study the efficiency guarantees possible when the mechanism is not allowed to price differen-
tiate. We study the worst-case efficiency loss (ratio of the utility associated with a Nash equilibrium to the
maximum possible utility), and show that the proportional allocation mechanism of Kelly (1997) minimizes
the efficiency loss when users are price anticipating. We then turn our attention to mechanisms where price
differentiation is permitted; using an adaptation of the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves class of mechanisms, we con-
struct a class of mechanisms with one-dimensional strategy spaces where Nash equilibria are fully efficient.
These mechanisms are shown to be fully efficient even in general convex environments, under reasonable
assumptions. Our results highlight a fundamental insight in mechanism design: when the pricing flexibility
available to the mechanism designer is limited, restricting the strategic flexibility of bidders may actually
improve the efficiency guarantee.National Science FoundationArmy Research OfficeDARPA - Next Generation Internet InitiativeNational Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowshi
On the Efficiency of the Proportional Allocation Mechanism for Divisible Resources
We study the efficiency of the proportional allocation mechanism, that is
widely used to allocate divisible resources. Each agent submits a bid for each
divisible resource and receives a fraction proportional to her bids. We
quantify the inefficiency of Nash equilibria by studying the Price of Anarchy
(PoA) of the induced game under complete and incomplete information. When
agents' valuations are concave, we show that the Bayesian Nash equilibria can
be arbitrarily inefficient, in contrast to the well-known 4/3 bound for pure
equilibria. Next, we upper bound the PoA over Bayesian equilibria by 2 when
agents' valuations are subadditive, generalizing and strengthening previous
bounds on lattice submodular valuations. Furthermore, we show that this bound
is tight and cannot be improved by any simple or scale-free mechanism. Then we
switch to settings with budget constraints, and we show an improved upper bound
on the PoA over coarse-correlated equilibria. Finally, we prove that the PoA is
exactly 2 for pure equilibria in the polyhedral environment.Comment: To appear in SAGT 201
Parameterized Supply Function Bidding: Equilibrium and Efficiency
We consider a model where a finite number of producers compete to meet an infinitely divisible but inelastic demand for a product. Each firm is characterized by a production cost that is convex in the output produced, and firms act as profit maximizers. We consider a uniform price market design that uses supply function bidding: firms declare the amount they would supply at any positive price, and a single price is chosen to clear the market. We are interested in evaluating the impact of price-anticipating behavior both on the allocative efficiency of the market and on the prices seen at equilibrium. We show that by restricting the strategy space of the firms to parameterized supply functions, we can provide upper bounds on both the inflation of aggregate cost at the Nash equilibrium relative to the socially optimal level, as well as the markup of the Nash equilibrium price above the competitive level: as long as N > 2 firms are competing, these quantities are both upper bounded by 1 + 1/(N − 2). This result holds even in the presence of asymmetric cost structure across firms. We also discuss several extensions, generalizations, and related issues.National Science Foundation (U.S.) (Graduate Research Fellowship)National Science Foundation (U.S.) (grant ECS-0312921
Incentives-Based Mechanism for Efficient Demand Response Programs
In this work we investigate the inefficiency of the electricity system with
strategic agents. Specifically, we prove that without a proper control the
total demand of an inefficient system is at most twice the total demand of the
optimal outcome. We propose an incentives scheme that promotes optimal outcomes
in the inefficient electricity market. The economic incentives can be seen as
an indirect revelation mechanism that allocates resources using a
one-dimensional message space per resource to be allocated. The mechanism does
not request private information from users and is valid for any concave
customer's valuation function. We propose a distributed implementation of the
mechanism using population games and evaluate the performance of four popular
dynamics methods in terms of the cost to implement the mechanism. We find that
the achievement of efficiency in strategic environments might be achieved at a
cost, which is dependent on both the users' preferences and the dynamic
evolution of the system. Some simulation results illustrate the ideas presented
throughout the paper.Comment: 38 pages, 9 figures, submitted to journa
Almost Budget Balanced Mechanisms with Scalar Bids For Allocation of a Divisible Good
This paper is about allocation of an infinitely divisible good to several
rational and strategic agents. The allocation is done by a social planner who
has limited information because the agents' valuation functions are taken to be
private information known only to the respective agents. We allow only a scalar
signal, called a bid, from each agent to the social planner. Yang and Hajek
[Jour. on Selected Areas in Comm., 2007] as well as Johari and Tsitsiklis
[Jour. of Oper. Res., 2009] proposed a scalar strategy Vickrey-Clarke-Groves
(SSVCG) mechanism with efficient Nash equilibria. We consider a setting where
the social planner desires minimal budget surplus. Example situations include
fair sharing of Internet resources and auctioning of certain public goods where
revenue maximization is not a consideration. Under the SSVCG framework, we
propose a mechanism that is efficient and comes close to budget balance by
returning much of the payments back to the agents in the form of rebates. We
identify a design criterion for {\em almost budget balance}, impose feasibility
and voluntary participation constraints, simplify the constraints, and arrive
at a convex optimization problem to identify the parameters of the rebate
functions. The convex optimization problem has a linear objective function and
a continuum of linear constraints. We propose a solution method that involves a
finite number of constraints, and identify the number of samples sufficient for
a good approximation.Comment: Accepted for publication in the European Journal of Operational
Research (EJOR