22,441 research outputs found
Training neural networks to encode symbols enables combinatorial generalization
Combinatorial generalization - the ability to understand and produce novel
combinations of already familiar elements - is considered to be a core capacity
of the human mind and a major challenge to neural network models. A significant
body of research suggests that conventional neural networks can't solve this
problem unless they are endowed with mechanisms specifically engineered for the
purpose of representing symbols. In this paper we introduce a novel way of
representing symbolic structures in connectionist terms - the vectors approach
to representing symbols (VARS), which allows training standard neural
architectures to encode symbolic knowledge explicitly at their output layers.
In two simulations, we show that neural networks not only can learn to produce
VARS representations, but in doing so they achieve combinatorial generalization
in their symbolic and non-symbolic output. This adds to other recent work that
has shown improved combinatorial generalization under specific training
conditions, and raises the question of whether specific mechanisms or training
routines are needed to support symbolic processing
RDF Querying
Reactive Web systems, Web services, and Web-based publish/
subscribe systems communicate events as XML messages, and in
many cases require composite event detection: it is not sufficient to react
to single event messages, but events have to be considered in relation to
other events that are received over time.
Emphasizing language design and formal semantics, we describe the
rule-based query language XChangeEQ for detecting composite events.
XChangeEQ is designed to completely cover and integrate the four complementary
querying dimensions: event data, event composition, temporal
relationships, and event accumulation. Semantics are provided as
model and fixpoint theories; while this is an established approach for rule
languages, it has not been applied for event queries before
Motion as manipulation: Implementation of motion and force analogies by event-file binding and action planning\ud
Tool improvisation analogies are a special case of motion and force analogies that appear to be implemented pre-conceptually, in many species, by event-file binding and action planning. A detailed reconstruction of the analogical reasoning steps involved in Rutherford's and Bohr's development of the first quantized-orbit model of atomic structure is used to show that human motion and force analogies generally can be implemented by the event-file binding and action planning mechanism. Predictions that distinguish this model from competing concept-level models of analogy are discussed, available data pertaining to them are reviewed, and further experimental tests are proposed
- ā¦