2,593 research outputs found

    Power-Performance Modeling and Adaptive Management of Heterogeneous Mobile Platformsโ€‹

    Get PDF
    abstract: Nearly 60% of the world population uses a mobile phone, which is typically powered by a system-on-chip (SoC). While the mobile platform capabilities range widely, responsiveness, long battery life and reliability are common design concerns that are crucial to remain competitive. Consequently, state-of-the-art mobile platforms have become highly heterogeneous by combining a powerful SoC with numerous other resources, including display, memory, power management IC, battery and wireless modems. Furthermore, the SoC itself is a heterogeneous resource that integrates many processing elements, such as CPU cores, GPU, video, image, and audio processors. Therefore, CPU cores do not dominate the platform power consumption under many application scenarios. Competitive performance requires higher operating frequency, and leads to larger power consumption. In turn, power consumption increases the junction and skin temperatures, which have adverse effects on the device reliability and user experience. As a result, allocating the power budget among the major platform resources and temperature control have become fundamental consideration for mobile platforms. Dynamic thermal and power management algorithms address this problem by putting a subset of the processing elements or shared resources to sleep states, or throttling their frequencies. However, an adhoc approach could easily cripple the performance, if it slows down the performance-critical processing element. Furthermore, mobile platforms run a wide range of applications with time varying workload characteristics, unlike early generations, which supported only limited functionality. As a result, there is a need for adaptive power and performance management approaches that consider the platform as a whole, rather than focusing on a subset. Towards this need, our specific contributions include (a) a framework to dynamically select the Pareto-optimal frequency and active cores for the heterogeneous CPUs, such as ARM big.Little architecture, (b) a dynamic power budgeting approach for allocating optimal power consumption to the CPU and GPU using performance sensitivity models for each PE, (c) an adaptive GPU frame time sensitivity prediction model to aid power management algorithms, and (d) an online learning algorithm that constructs adaptive run-time models for non-stationary workloads.Dissertation/ThesisDoctoral Dissertation Electrical Engineering 201

    Doctor of Philosophy

    Get PDF
    dissertationThe embedded system space is characterized by a rapid evolution in the complexity and functionality of applications. In addition, the short time-to-market nature of the business motivates the use of programmable devices capable of meeting the conflicting constraints of low-energy, high-performance, and short design times. The keys to achieving these conflicting constraints are specialization and maximally extracting available application parallelism. General purpose processors are flexible but are either too power hungry or lack the necessary performance. Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICS) efficiently meet the performance and power needs but are inflexible. Programmable domain-specific architectures (DSAs) are an attractive middle ground, but their design requires significant time, resources, and expertise in a variety of specialties, which range from application algorithms to architecture and ultimately, circuit design. This dissertation presents CoGenE, a design framework that automates the design of energy-performance-optimal DSAs for embedded systems. For a given application domain and a user-chosen initial architectural specification, CoGenE consists of a a Compiler to generate execution binary, a simulator Generator to collect performance/energy statistics, and an Explorer that modifies the current architecture to improve energy-performance-area characteristics. The above process repeats automatically until the user-specified constraints are achieved. This removes or alleviates the time needed to understand the application, manually design the DSA, and generate object code for the DSA. Thus, CoGenE is a new design methodology that represents a significant improvement in performance, energy dissipation, design time, and resources. This dissertation employs the face recognition domain to showcase a flexible architectural design methodology that creates "ASIC-like" DSAs. The DSAs are instruction set architecture (ISA)-independent and achieve good energy-performance characteristics by coscheduling the often conflicting constraints of data access, data movement, and computation through a flexible interconnect. This represents a significant increase in programming complexity and code generation time. To address this problem, the CoGenE compiler employs integer linear programming (ILP)-based 'interconnect-aware' scheduling techniques for automatic code generation. The CoGenE explorer employs an iterative technique to search the complete design space and select a set of energy-performance-optimal candidates. When compared to manual designs, results demonstrate that CoGenE produces superior designs for three application domains: face recognition, speech recognition and wireless telephony. While CoGenE is well suited to applications that exhibit a streaming behavior, multithreaded applications like ray tracing present a different but important challenge. To demonstrate its generality, CoGenE is evaluated in designing a novel multicore N-wide SIMD architecture, known as StreamRay, for the ray tracing domain. CoGenE is used to synthesize the SIMD execution cores, the compiler that generates the application binary, and the interconnection subsystem. Further, separating address and data computations in space reduces data movement and contention for resources, thereby significantly improving performance compared to existing ray tracing approaches

    ์„ฑ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ ์ธตํ˜• ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๊ตฌ์กฐ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€(์ง€๋Šฅํ˜•์œตํ•ฉ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ „๊ณต), 2019. 2. ์•ˆ์ •ํ˜ธ.The advance of DRAM manufacturing technology slows down, whereas the density and performance needs of DRAM continue to increase. This desire has motivated the industry to explore emerging Non-Volatile Memory (e.g., 3D XPoint) and the high-density DRAM (e.g., Managed DRAM Solution). Since such memory technologies increase the density at the cost of longer latency, lower bandwidth, or both, it is essential to use them with fast memory (e.g., conventional DRAM) to which hot pages are transferred at runtime. Nonetheless, we observe that page transfers to fast memory often block memory channels from servicing memory requests from applications for a long period. This in turn significantly increases the high-percentile response time of latency-sensitive applications. In this thesis, we propose a high-density managed DRAM architecture, dubbed 3D-XPath for applications demanding both low latency and high capacity for memory. 3D-XPath DRAM stacks conventional DRAM dies with high-density DRAM dies explored in this thesis and connects these DRAM dies with 3D-XPath. Especially, 3D-XPath allows unused memory channels to service memory requests from applications when primary channels supposed to handle the memory requests are blocked by page transfers at given moments, considerably increasing the high-percentile response time. This can also improve the throughput of applications frequently copying memory blocks between kernel and user memory spaces. Our evaluation shows that 3D-XPath DRAM decreases high-percentile response time of latency-sensitive applications by โˆผ30% while improving the throughput of an I/O-intensive applications by โˆผ39%, compared with DRAM without 3D-XPath. Recent computer systems are evolving toward the integration of more CPU cores into a single socket, which require higher memory bandwidth and capacity. Increasing the number of channels per socket is a common solution to the bandwidth demand and to better utilize these increased channels, data bus width is reduced and burst length is increased. However, this longer burst length brings increased DRAM access latency. On the memory capacity side, process scaling has been the answer for decades, but cell capacitance now limits how small a cell could be. 3D stacked memory solves this problem by stacking dies on top of other dies. We made a key observation in real multicore machine that multiple memory controllers are always not fully utilized on SPEC CPU 2006 rate benchmark. To bring these idle channels into play, we proposed memory channel sharing architecture to boost peak bandwidth of one memory channel and reduce the burst latency on 3D stacked memory. By channel sharing, the total performance on multi-programmed workloads and multi-threaded workloads improved up to respectively 4.3% and 3.6% and the average read latency reduced up to 8.22% and 10.18%.DRAM ์ œ์กฐ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „์€ ์†๋„๊ฐ€ ๋Š๋ ค์ง€๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด DRAM์˜ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ ์š”๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ณ„์† ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์š”๊ตฌ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋น„ ํœ˜๋ฐœ์„ฑ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ(์˜ˆ: 3D-XPoint) ๋ฐ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ DRAM(์˜ˆ: Managed asymmetric latency DRAM Solution)์ด ๋“ฑ์žฅํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์€ ๊ธด ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ด์‹œ, ๋‚ฎ์€ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ ๋˜๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ชจ๋‘๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‹์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ์ข‹์ง€ ์•Š์•„, ํ•ซ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ณ ์† ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ(์˜ˆ: ์ผ๋ฐ˜ DRAM)๋กœ ์Šค์™‘๋˜๋Š” ์ €์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ๊ณ ์† ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ๋™์‹œ์— ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์Šค์™‘ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ ๋น ๋ฅธ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋กœ์˜ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์ „์†ก์ด ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์š”์ฒญ์„ ์˜ค๋žซ๋™์•ˆ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—, ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ์‘์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œ„ ์‘๋‹ต ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œ์ผœ, ์‘๋‹ต ์‹œ๊ฐ„์˜ ํ‘œ์ค€ ํŽธ์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ € ์ง€์—ฐ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ๊ณ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋Š” ์• ํ”Œ๋ฆฌ์ผ€์ด์…˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด 3D-XPath, ์ฆ‰ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ DRAM ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ 3D-ํ†”์†Œ๋ฅผ ์ง‘์ ํ•œ DRAM์€ ์ €์†์˜ ๊ณ ๋ฐ€๋„ DRAM ๋‹ค์ด๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ DRAM ๋‹ค์ด์™€ ๋™์‹œ์— ํ•œ ์นฉ์— ์ ์ธตํ•˜๊ณ , DRAM ๋‹ค์ด๋ผ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” 3D-XPath ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ 3D-XPath๋Š” ํ•ซ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์Šค์™‘์ด ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๋Š” ๋™์•ˆ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์š”์ฒญ์„ ์ฐจ๋‹จํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์ด ์ ์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ฑ„๋„๋กœ ํ•ซ ํŽ˜์ด์ง€ ์Šค์™‘์„ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ง‘์ค‘ ์‘์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œ„ ์‘๋‹ต ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ O/S ์ปค๋„๊ณผ ์œ ์ € ์ŠคํŽ˜์ด์Šค ๊ฐ„์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋ธ”๋ก์„ ์ž์ฃผ ๋ณต์‚ฌํ•˜๋Š” ์‘์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ 3D-XPath DRAM์€ 3D-XPath๊ฐ€ ์—†๋Š” DRAM์— ๋น„ํ•ด I/O ์ง‘์•ฝ์ ์ธ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 39 % ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉด์„œ ๋ ˆ์ดํ„ด์‹œ์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ์‘์šฉ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๋†’์€ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œ„ ์‘๋‹ต ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ตœ๋Œ€ 30 %๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ๊ณผ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ํ•„์š”๋กœํ•˜๋Š” ๋” ๋งŽ์€ CPU ์ฝ”์–ด๋ฅผ ๋‹จ์ผ ์†Œ์ผ“์œผ๋กœ ํ†ตํ•ฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์†Œ์ผ“ ๋‹น ์ฑ„๋„ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ๋Š˜๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์€ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ ์š”๊ตฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ํ•ด๊ฒฐ์ฑ…์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ DRAM ์ธํ„ฐํŽ˜์ด์Šค์˜ ๋ฐœ์ „ ์–‘์ƒ์€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„์„ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์ž˜ ํ™œ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๋ฒ„์Šค ํญ์ด ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜๊ณ  ๋ฒ„์ŠคํŠธ ๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ๊ธธ์–ด์ง„ ๋ฒ„์ŠคํŠธ ๊ธธ์ด๋Š” DRAM ์•ก์„ธ์Šค ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋” ๋งŽ์€ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์š”๊ตฌํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ฏธ์„ธ ๊ณต์ •์œผ๋กœ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์€ ์ˆ˜์‹ญ ๋…„ ๋™์•ˆ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜์—ˆ์ง€๋งŒ, 20 nm ์ดํ•˜์˜ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ณต์ •์—์„œ๋Š” ๋” ์ด์ƒ ๊ณต์ • ๋ฏธ์„ธํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ€๋„๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๊ธฐ๊ฐ€ ์–ด๋ ค์šด ์ƒํ™ฉ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ ์ธตํ˜• ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ, ์‹ค์ œ ์ตœ์‹ ์˜ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด ๋จธ์‹ ์—์„œ SPEC CPU 2006 ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์ฝ”์–ด์—์„œ ์‹คํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ํ•ญ์ƒ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๋ชจ๋“  ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ปจํŠธ๋กค๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€ ์™„์ „ํžˆ ํ™œ์šฉ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๋‹ค๋Š” ์‚ฌ์‹ค์„ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์œ ํœด ์ฑ„๋„์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ•˜๋‚˜์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ฑ„๋„์˜ ํ”ผํฌ ๋Œ€์—ญํญ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ณ  3D ์Šคํƒ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ์˜ ๋ฒ„์ŠคํŠธ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ณต์œ  ์•„ํ‚คํ…์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด ๋ธ”๋ก์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ฑ„๋„ ๊ณต์œ ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋œ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ๋ฐ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์Šค๋ ˆ๋“œ ์‘์šฉํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 4.3 % ๋ฐ 3.6 %๋กœ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ‰๊ท  ์ฝ๊ธฐ ๋Œ€๊ธฐ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์€ 8.22 % ๋ฐ 10.18 %๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.Contents Abstract i Contents iv List of Figures vi List of Tables viii Introduction 1 1.1 3D-XPath: High-Density Managed DRAM Architecture with Cost-effective Alternative Paths for Memory Transactions 5 1.2 Boosting Bandwidth โ€“ Dynamic Channel Sharing on 3D Stacked Memory 9 1.3 Research contribution 13 1.4 Outline 14 3D-stacked Heterogeneous Memory Architecture with Cost-effective Extra Block Transfer Paths 17 2.1 Background 17 2.1.1 Heterogeneous Main Memory Systems 17 2.1.2 Specialized DRAM 19 2.1.3 3D-stacked Memory 22 2.2 HIGH-DENSITY DRAM ARCHITECTURE 27 2.2.1 Key Design Challenges 29 2.2.2 Plausible High-density DRAM Designs 33 2.3 3D-STACKED DRAM WITH ALTERNATIVE PATHS FOR MEMORY TRANSACTIONS 37 2.3.1 3D-XPath Architecture 41 2.3.2 3D-XPath Management 46 2.4 EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY 52 2.5 EVALUATION 56 2.5.1 OLDI Workloads 56 2.5.2 Non-OLDI Workloads 61 2.5.3 Sensitivity Analysis 66 2.6 RELATED WORK 70 Boosting bandwidth โ€“Dynamic Channel Sharing on 3D Stacked Memory 72 3.1 Background: Memory Operations 72 3.1.1. Memory Controller 72 3.1.2 DRAM column access sequence 73 3.2 Related Work 74 3.3. CHANNEL SHARING ENABLED MEMORY SYSTEM 76 3.3.1 Hardware Requirements 78 3.3.2 Operation Sequence 81 3.4 Analysis 87 3.4.1 Experiment Environment 87 3.4.2 Performance 88 3.4.3 Overhead 90 CONCLUSION 92 REFERENCES 94 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 107Docto

    DeepNVM++: Cross-Layer Modeling and Optimization Framework of Non-Volatile Memories for Deep Learning

    Full text link
    Non-volatile memory (NVM) technologies such as spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory (STT-MRAM) and spin-orbit torque magnetic random access memory (SOT-MRAM) have significant advantages compared to conventional SRAM due to their non-volatility, higher cell density, and scalability features. While previous work has investigated several architectural implications of NVM for generic applications, in this work we present DeepNVM++, a framework to characterize, model, and analyze NVM-based caches in GPU architectures for deep learning (DL) applications by combining technology-specific circuit-level models and the actual memory behavior of various DL workloads. We present both iso-capacity and iso-area performance and energy analysis for systems whose last-level caches rely on conventional SRAM and emerging STT-MRAM and SOT-MRAM technologies. In the iso-capacity case, STT-MRAM and SOT-MRAM provide up to 3.8x and 4.7x energy-delay product (EDP) reduction and 2.4x and 2.8x area reduction compared to conventional SRAM, respectively. Under iso-area assumptions, STT-MRAM and SOT-MRAM provide up to 2x and 2.3x EDP reduction and accommodate 2.3x and 3.3x cache capacity when compared to SRAM, respectively. We also perform a scalability analysis and show that STT-MRAM and SOT-MRAM achieve orders of magnitude EDP reduction when compared to SRAM for large cache capacities. Our comprehensive cross-layer framework is demonstrated on STT-/SOT-MRAM technologies and can be used for the characterization, modeling, and analysis of any NVM technology for last-level caches in GPUs for DL applications.Comment: 12 pages, 10 figure
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore