2,338 research outputs found

    On the Enumeration of Minimal Dominating Sets and Related Notions

    Full text link
    A dominating set DD in a graph is a subset of its vertex set such that each vertex is either in DD or has a neighbour in DD. In this paper, we are interested in the enumeration of (inclusion-wise) minimal dominating sets in graphs, called the Dom-Enum problem. It is well known that this problem can be polynomially reduced to the Trans-Enum problem in hypergraphs, i.e., the problem of enumerating all minimal transversals in a hypergraph. Firstly we show that the Trans-Enum problem can be polynomially reduced to the Dom-Enum problem. As a consequence there exists an output-polynomial time algorithm for the Trans-Enum problem if and only if there exists one for the Dom-Enum problem. Secondly, we study the Dom-Enum problem in some graph classes. We give an output-polynomial time algorithm for the Dom-Enum problem in split graphs, and introduce the completion of a graph to obtain an output-polynomial time algorithm for the Dom-Enum problem in P6P_6-free chordal graphs, a proper superclass of split graphs. Finally, we investigate the complexity of the enumeration of (inclusion-wise) minimal connected dominating sets and minimal total dominating sets of graphs. We show that there exists an output-polynomial time algorithm for the Dom-Enum problem (or equivalently Trans-Enum problem) if and only if there exists one for the following enumeration problems: minimal total dominating sets, minimal total dominating sets in split graphs, minimal connected dominating sets in split graphs, minimal dominating sets in co-bipartite graphs.Comment: 15 pages, 3 figures, In revisio

    The complexity of dominating set reconfiguration

    Full text link
    Suppose that we are given two dominating sets DsD_s and DtD_t of a graph GG whose cardinalities are at most a given threshold kk. Then, we are asked whether there exists a sequence of dominating sets of GG between DsD_s and DtD_t such that each dominating set in the sequence is of cardinality at most kk and can be obtained from the previous one by either adding or deleting exactly one vertex. This problem is known to be PSPACE-complete in general. In this paper, we study the complexity of this decision problem from the viewpoint of graph classes. We first prove that the problem remains PSPACE-complete even for planar graphs, bounded bandwidth graphs, split graphs, and bipartite graphs. We then give a general scheme to construct linear-time algorithms and show that the problem can be solved in linear time for cographs, trees, and interval graphs. Furthermore, for these tractable cases, we can obtain a desired sequence such that the number of additions and deletions is bounded by O(n)O(n), where nn is the number of vertices in the input graph

    Locating-dominating sets in twin-free graphs

    Full text link
    A locating-dominating set of a graph GG is a dominating set DD of GG with the additional property that every two distinct vertices outside DD have distinct neighbors in DD; that is, for distinct vertices uu and vv outside DD, N(u)∩D≠N(v)∩DN(u) \cap D \ne N(v) \cap D where N(u)N(u) denotes the open neighborhood of uu. A graph is twin-free if every two distinct vertices have distinct open and closed neighborhoods. The location-domination number of GG, denoted γL(G)\gamma_L(G), is the minimum cardinality of a locating-dominating set in GG. It is conjectured [D. Garijo, A. Gonz\'alez and A. M\'arquez. The difference between the metric dimension and the determining number of a graph. Applied Mathematics and Computation 249 (2014), 487--501] that if GG is a twin-free graph of order nn without isolated vertices, then γL(G)≤n2\gamma_L(G)\le \frac{n}{2}. We prove the general bound γL(G)≤2n3\gamma_L(G)\le \frac{2n}{3}, slightly improving over the ⌊2n3⌋+1\lfloor\frac{2n}{3}\rfloor+1 bound of Garijo et al. We then provide constructions of graphs reaching the n2\frac{n}{2} bound, showing that if the conjecture is true, the family of extremal graphs is a very rich one. Moreover, we characterize the trees GG that are extremal for this bound. We finally prove the conjecture for split graphs and co-bipartite graphs.Comment: 11 pages; 4 figure
    • …
    corecore