Multi-Dataset, Multitask Learning of Egocentric Vision Tasks

For egocentric vision tasks such as action recognition, there is a relative scarcity of labeled data. This increases the risk of overfitting during training. In this paper, we address this issue by introducing a multitask learning scheme that employs related tasks as well as related datasets in the training process. Related tasks are indicative of the performed action, such as the presence of objects and the position of the hands. By including related tasks as additional outputs to be optimized, action recognition performance typically increases because the network focuses on relevant aspects in the video. Still, the training data is limited to a single dataset because the set of action labels usually differs across datasets. To mitigate this issue, we extend the multitask paradigm to include datasets with different label sets. During training, we effectively mix batches with samples from multiple datasets. Our experiments on egocentric action recognition in the EPIC-Kitchens, EGTEA Gaze+, ADL and Charades-EGO datasets demonstrate the improvements of our approach over single-dataset baselines. On EGTEA we surpass the current state-of-the-art by 2.47 percent. We further illustrate the cross-dataset task correlations that emerge automatically with our novel training scheme

Analysis of the hands in egocentric vision: A survey

Egocentric vision (a.k.a. first-person vision - FPV) applications have thrived over the past few years, thanks to the availability of affordable wearable cameras and large annotated datasets. The position of the wearable camera (usually mounted on the head) allows recording exactly what the camera wearers have in front of them, in particular hands and manipulated objects. This intrinsic advantage enables the study of the hands from multiple perspectives: localizing hands and their parts within the images; understanding what actions and activities the hands are involved in; and developing human-computer interfaces that rely on hand gestures. In this survey, we review the literature that focuses on the hands using egocentric vision, categorizing the existing approaches into: localization (where are the hands or parts of them?); interpretation (what are the hands doing?); and application (e.g., systems that used egocentric hand cues for solving a specific problem). Moreover, a list of the most prominent datasets with hand-based annotations is provided

Learning from Very Few Samples: A Survey

Few sample learning (FSL) is significant and challenging in the field of machine learning. The capability of learning and generalizing from very few samples successfully is a noticeable demarcation separating artificial intelligence and human intelligence since humans can readily establish their cognition to novelty from just a single or a handful of examples whereas machine learning algorithms typically entail hundreds or thousands of supervised samples to guarantee generalization ability. Despite the long history dated back to the early 2000s and the widespread attention in recent years with booming deep learning technologies, little surveys or reviews for FSL are available until now. In this context, we extensively review 300+ papers of FSL spanning from the 2000s to 2019 and provide a timely and comprehensive survey for FSL. In this survey, we review the evolution history as well as the current progress on FSL, categorize FSL approaches into the generative model based and discriminative model based kinds in principle, and emphasize particularly on the meta learning based FSL approaches. We also summarize several recently emerging extensional topics of FSL and review the latest advances on these topics. Furthermore, we highlight the important FSL applications covering many research hotspots in computer vision, natural language processing, audio and speech, reinforcement learning and robotic, data analysis, etc. Finally, we conclude the survey with a discussion on promising trends in the hope of providing guidance and insights to follow-up researches.Comment: 30 page