Learning Affect with Distributional Semantic Models

The affective content of a text depends on the valence and emotion values of its words. At the same time a word distributional properties deeply influence its affective content. For instance a word may become negatively loaded because it tends to co-occur with other negative expressions. Lexical affective values are used as features in sentiment analysis systems and are typically estimated with hand-made resources (e.g. WordNet Affect), which have a limited coverage. In this paper we show how distributional semantic models can effectively be used to bootstrap emotive embeddings for Italian words and then compute affective scores with respect to eight basic emotions. We also show how these emotive scores can be used to learn the positive vs. negative valence of words and model behavioral data

Learning Affect with Distributional Semantic Models

The affective content of a text depends on the valence and emotion values of its words. At the same time a word distributional properties deeply influence its affective content. For instance a word may become negatively loaded because it tends to co-occur with other negative expressions. Lexical affective values are used as features in sentiment analysis systems and are typically estimated with hand-made resources (e.g. WordNet Affect), which have a limited coverage. In this paper we show how distributional semantic models can effectively be used to bootstrap emotive embeddings for Italian words and then compute affective scores with respect to eight basic emotions. We also show how these emotive scores can be used to learn the positive vs. negative valence of words and model behavioral data

Computing the Affective-Aesthetic Potential of Literary Texts

In this paper, we compute the affective-aesthetic potential (AAP) of literary texts by using a simple sentiment analysis tool called SentiArt. In contrast to other established tools, SentiArt is based on publicly available vector space models (VSMs) and requires no emotional dictionary, thus making it applicable in any language for which VSMs have been made available (>150 so far) and avoiding issues of low coverage. In a first study, the AAP values of all words of a widely used lexical databank for German were computed and the VSM’s ability in representing concrete and more abstract semantic concepts was demonstrated. In a second study, SentiArt was used to predict ~2800 human word valence ratings and shown to have a high predictive accuracy (R2 > 0.5, p < 0.0001). A third study tested the validity of SentiArt in predicting emotional states over (narrative) time using human liking ratings from reading a story. Again, the predictive accuracy was highly significant: R2adj = 0.46, p < 0.0001, establishing the SentiArt tool as a promising candidate for lexical sentiment analyses at both the micro- and macrolevels, i.e., short and long literary materials. Possibilities and limitations of lexical VSM-based sentiment analyses of diverse complex literary texts are discussed in the light of these results

Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From The Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics

Two computational studies provide different sentiment analyses for text segments (e.g., ‘fearful’ passages) and figures (e.g., ‘Voldemort’) from the Harry Potter books (Rowling, 1997 - 2007) based on a novel simple tool called SentiArt. The tool uses vector space models together with theory-guided, empirically validated label lists to compute the valence of each word in a text by locating its position in a 2d emotion potential space spanned by the > 2 million words of the vector space model. After testing the tool’s accuracy with empirical data from a neurocognitive study, it was applied to compute emotional figure profiles and personality figure profiles (inspired by the so-called ‚big five’ personality theory) for main characters from the book series. The results of comparative analyses using different machine-learning classifiers (e.g., AdaBoost, Neural Net) show that SentiArt performs very well in predicting the emotion potential of text passages. It also produces plausible predictions regarding the emotional and personality profile of fiction characters which are correctly identified on the basis of eight character features, and it achieves a good cross-validation accuracy in classifying 100 figures into ‘good’ vs. ‘bad’ ones. The results are discussed with regard to potential applications of SentiArt in digital literary, applied reading and neurocognitive poetics studies such as the quantification of the hybrid hero potential of figures