Distributed-Memory Breadth-First Search on Massive Graphs

This chapter studies the problem of traversing large graphs using the breadth-first search order on distributed-memory supercomputers. We consider both the traditional level-synchronous top-down algorithm as well as the recently discovered direction optimizing algorithm. We analyze the performance and scalability trade-offs in using different local data structures such as CSR and DCSC, enabling in-node multithreading, and graph decompositions such as 1D and 2D decomposition.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1104.451

Using Graph Properties to Speed-up GPU-based Graph Traversal: A Model-driven Approach

While it is well-known and acknowledged that the performance of graph algorithms is heavily dependent on the input data, there has been surprisingly little research to quantify and predict the impact the graph structure has on performance. Parallel graph algorithms, running on many-core systems such as GPUs, are no exception: most research has focused on how to efficiently implement and tune different graph operations on a specific GPU. However, the performance impact of the input graph has only been taken into account indirectly as a result of the graphs used to benchmark the system. In this work, we present a case study investigating how to use the properties of the input graph to improve the performance of the breadth-first search (BFS) graph traversal. To do so, we first study the performance variation of 15 different BFS implementations across 248 graphs. Using this performance data, we show that significant speed-up can be achieved by combining the best implementation for each level of the traversal. To make use of this data-dependent optimization, we must correctly predict the relative performance of algorithms per graph level, and enable dynamic switching to the optimal algorithm for each level at runtime. We use the collected performance data to train a binary decision tree, to enable high-accuracy predictions and fast switching. We demonstrate empirically that our decision tree is both fast enough to allow dynamic switching between implementations, without noticeable overhead, and accurate enough in its prediction to enable significant BFS speedup. We conclude that our model-driven approach (1) enables BFS to outperform state of the art GPU algorithms, and (2) can be adapted for other BFS variants, other algorithms, or more specific datasets

Graph analytics on modern massively parallel systems

Graphs provide a very flexible abstraction for understanding and modeling complex systems in many fields such as physics, biology, neuroscience, engineering, and social science. Only in the last two decades, with the advent of Big Data era, supercomputers equipped by accelerators –i.e., Graphics Processing Unit (GPUs)–, advanced networking, and highly parallel file systems have been used to analyze graph properties such as reachability, diameter, connected components, centrality, and clustering coefficient. Today graphs of interest may be composed by millions, sometimes billions, of nodes and edges and exhibit a highly irregular structure. As a consequence, the design of efficient and scalable graph algorithms is an extraordinary challenge due to irregular communication and memory access patterns, high synchronization costs, and lack of data locality. In the present dissertation, we start off with a brief and gentle introduction for the reader to graph analytics and massively parallel systems. In particular, we present the intersection between graph analytics and parallel architectures in the current state-of-the-art and discuss the challenges encountered when solving such problems on large-scale graphs on these architectures (Chapter 1). In Chapter 2, some preliminary definitions and graph-theoretical notions are provided together with a description of the synthetic graphs used in the literature to model real-world networks. In Chapters 3-5, we present and tackle three different relevant problems in graph analysis: reachability (Chapter 3), Betweenness Centrality (Chapter 4), and clustering coefficient (Chapter 5). In detail, Chapter 3 tackles reachability problems by providing two scalable algorithms and implementations which efficiently solve st-connectivity problems on very large-scale graphs Chapter 4 considers the problem of identifying most relevant nodes in a network which plays a crucial role in several applications, including transportation and communication networks, social network analysis, and biological networks. In particular, we focus on a well-known centrality metrics, namely Betweenness Centrality (BC), and present two different distributed algorithms for the BC computation on unweighted and weighted graphs. For unweighted graphs, we present a new communication-efficient algorithm based on the combination of bi-dimensional (2D) decomposition and multi-level parallelism. Furthermore, new algorithms which exploit the underlying graph topology to reduce the time and space usage of betweenness centrality computations are described as well. Concerning weighted graphs, we provide a scalable algorithm based on an algebraic formulation of the problem. Finally, thorough comprehensive experimental results on synthetic and real- world large-scale graphs, we show that the proposed techniques are effective in practice and achieve significant speedups against state-of-the-art solutions. Chapter 5 considers clustering coefficients problem. Similarly to Betweenness Centrality, it is a fundamental tool in network analysis, as it specifically measures how nodes tend to cluster together in a network. In the chapter, we first extend caching techniques to Remote Memory Access (RMA) operations on distributed-memory system. The caching layer is mainly designed to avoid inter-node communications in order to achieve similar benefits for irregular applications as communication-avoiding algorithms. We also show how cached RMA is able to improve the performance of a new distributed asynchronous algorithm for the computation of local clustering coefficients. Finally, Chapter 6 contains a brief summary of the key contributions described in the dissertation and presents potential future directions of the work