A Simple Deterministic Distributed MST Algorithm, with Near-Optimal Time and Message Complexities

Distributed minimum spanning tree (MST) problem is one of the most central and fundamental problems in distributed graph algorithms. Garay et al. \cite{GKP98,KP98} devised an algorithm with running time $O(D + \sqrt{n} \cdot \log^* n)$, where $D$ is the hop-diameter of the input $n$-vertex $m$-edge graph, and with message complexity $O(m + n^{3/2})$. Peleg and Rubinovich \cite{PR99} showed that the running time of the algorithm of \cite{KP98} is essentially tight, and asked if one can achieve near-optimal running time **together with near-optimal message complexity**. In a recent breakthrough, Pandurangan et al. \cite{PRS16} answered this question in the affirmative, and devised a **randomized** algorithm with time $\tilde{O}(D+ \sqrt{n})$ and message complexity $\tilde{O}(m)$. They asked if such a simultaneous time- and message-optimality can be achieved by a **deterministic** algorithm. In this paper, building upon the work of \cite{PRS16}, we answer this question in the affirmative, and devise a **deterministic** algorithm that computes MST in time $O((D + \sqrt{n}) \cdot \log n)$, using $O(m \cdot \log n + n \log n \cdot \log^* n)$ messages. The polylogarithmic factors in the time and message complexities of our algorithm are significantly smaller than the respective factors in the result of \cite{PRS16}. Also, our algorithm and its analysis are very **simple** and self-contained, as opposed to rather complicated previous sublinear-time algorithms \cite{GKP98,KP98,E04b,PRS16}

Almost-Tight Distributed Minimum Cut Algorithms

We study the problem of computing the minimum cut in a weighted distributed message-passing networks (the CONGEST model). Let $\lambda$ be the minimum cut, $n$ be the number of nodes in the network, and $D$ be the network diameter. Our algorithm can compute $\lambda$ exactly in $O((\sqrt{n} \log^{*} n+D)\lambda^4 \log^2 n)$ time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that explicitly studies computing the exact minimum cut in the distributed setting. Previously, non-trivial sublinear time algorithms for this problem are known only for unweighted graphs when $\lambda\leq 3$ due to Pritchard and Thurimella's $O(D)$-time and $O(D+n^{1/2}\log^* n)$-time algorithms for computing $2$-edge-connected and $3$-edge-connected components. By using the edge sampling technique of Karger's, we can convert this algorithm into a $(1+\epsilon)$-approximation $O((\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n+D)\epsilon^{-5}\log^3 n)$-time algorithm for any $\epsilon>0$. This improves over the previous $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation $O((\sqrt{n}\log^{*} n+D)\epsilon^{-5}\log^2 n\log\log n)$-time algorithm and $O(\epsilon^{-1})$-approximation $O(D+n^{\frac{1}{2}+\epsilon} \mathrm{poly}\log n)$-time algorithm of Ghaffari and Kuhn. Due to the lower bound of $\Omega(D+n^{1/2}/\log n)$ by Das Sarma et al. which holds for any approximation algorithm, this running time is tight up to a $\mathrm{poly}\log n$ factor. To get the stated running time, we developed an approximation algorithm which combines the ideas of Thorup's algorithm and Matula's contraction algorithm. It saves an $\epsilon^{-9}\log^{7} n$ factor as compared to applying Thorup's tree packing theorem directly. Then, we combine Kutten and Peleg's tree partitioning algorithm and Karger's dynamic programming to achieve an efficient distributed algorithm that finds the minimum cut when we are given a spanning tree that crosses the minimum cut exactly once

Distributed Approximation of Minimum Routing Cost Trees

We study the NP-hard problem of approximating a Minimum Routing Cost Spanning Tree in the message passing model with limited bandwidth (CONGEST model). In this problem one tries to find a spanning tree of a graph $G$ over $n$ nodes that minimizes the sum of distances between all pairs of nodes. In the considered model every node can transmit a different (but short) message to each of its neighbors in each synchronous round. We provide a randomized $(2+\epsilon)$-approximation with runtime $O(D+\frac{\log n}{\epsilon})$ for unweighted graphs. Here, $D$ is the diameter of $G$. This improves over both, the (expected) approximation factor $O(\log n)$ and the runtime $O(D\log^2 n)$ of the best previously known algorithm. Due to stating our results in a very general way, we also derive an (optimal) runtime of $O(D)$ when considering $O(\log n)$-approximations as done by the best previously known algorithm. In addition we derive a deterministic $2$-approximation

Distributed Testing of Excluded Subgraphs

We study property testing in the context of distributed computing, under the classical CONGEST model. It is known that testing whether a graph is triangle-free can be done in a constant number of rounds, where the constant depends on how far the input graph is from being triangle-free. We show that, for every connected 4-node graph H, testing whether a graph is H-free can be done in a constant number of rounds too. The constant also depends on how far the input graph is from being H-free, and the dependence is identical to the one in the case of testing triangles. Hence, in particular, testing whether a graph is K_4-free, and testing whether a graph is C_4-free can be done in a constant number of rounds (where K_k denotes the k-node clique, and C_k denotes the k-node cycle). On the other hand, we show that testing K_k-freeness and C_k-freeness for k>4 appear to be much harder. Specifically, we investigate two natural types of generic algorithms for testing H-freeness, called DFS tester and BFS tester. The latter captures the previously known algorithm to test the presence of triangles, while the former captures our generic algorithm to test the presence of a 4-node graph pattern H. We prove that both DFS and BFS testers fail to test K_k-freeness and C_k-freeness in a constant number of rounds for k>4