Disjunctive Answer Set Solvers via Templates

Answer set programming is a declarative programming paradigm oriented towards difficult combinatorial search problems. A fundamental task in answer set programming is to compute stable models, i.e., solutions of logic programs. Answer set solvers are the programs that perform this task. The problem of deciding whether a disjunctive program has a stable model is $\Sigma^P_2$-complete. The high complexity of reasoning within disjunctive logic programming is responsible for few solvers capable of dealing with such programs, namely DLV, GnT, Cmodels, CLASP and WASP. In this paper we show that transition systems introduced by Nieuwenhuis, Oliveras, and Tinelli to model and analyze satisfiability solvers can be adapted for disjunctive answer set solvers. Transition systems give a unifying perspective and bring clarity in the description and comparison of solvers. They can be effectively used for analyzing, comparing and proving correctness of search algorithms as well as inspiring new ideas in the design of disjunctive answer set solvers. In this light, we introduce a general template, which accounts for major techniques implemented in disjunctive solvers. We then illustrate how this general template captures solvers DLV, GnT and Cmodels. We also show how this framework provides a convenient tool for designing new solving algorithms by means of combinations of techniques employed in different solvers.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP

Automating Program Verification and Repair Using Invariant Analysis and Test Input Generation

Software bugs are a persistent feature of daily life---crashing web browsers, allowing cyberattacks, and distorting the results of scientific computations. One approach to improving software uses program invariants---mathematical descriptions of program behaviors---to verify code and detect bugs. Current invariant generation techniques lack support for complex yet important forms of invariants, such as general polynomial relations and properties of arrays. As a result, we lack the ability to conduct precise analysis of programs that use this common data structure. This dissertation presents DIG, a static and dynamic analysis framework for discovering several useful classes of program invariants, including (i) nonlinear polynomial relations, which are fundamental to many scientific applications; disjunctive invariants, (ii) which express branching behaviors in programs; and (iii) properties about multidimensional arrays, which appear in many practical applications. We describe theoretical and empirical results showing that DIG can efficiently and accurately find many important invariants in real-world uses, e.g., polynomial properties in numerical algorithms and array relations in a full AES encryption implementation. Automatic program verification and synthesis are long-standing problems in computer science. However, there has been a lot of work on program verification and less so on program synthesis. Consequently, important synthesis tasks, e.g., generating program repairs, remain difficult and time-consuming. This dissertation proves that certain formulations of verification and synthesis are equivalent, allowing for direct applications of techniques and tools between these two research areas. Based on these ideas, we develop CETI, a tool that leverages existing verification techniques and tools for automatic program repair. Experimental results show that CETI can have higher success rates than many other standard program repair methods

Modularity in answer set programs

Answer set programming (ASP) is an approach to rule-based constraint programming allowing flexible knowledge representation in variety of application areas. The declarative nature of ASP is reflected in problem solving. First, a programmer writes down a logic program the answer sets of which correspond to the solutions of the problem. The answer sets of the program are then computed using a special purpose search engine, an ASP solver. The development of efficient ASP solvers has enabled the use of answer set programming in various application domains such as planning, product configuration, computer aided verification, and bioinformatics. The topic of this thesis is modularity in answer set programming. While modern programming languages typically provide means to exploit modularity in a number of ways to govern the complexity of programs and their development process, relatively little attention has been paid to modularity in ASP. When designing a module architecture for ASP, it is essential to establish full compositionality of the semantics with respect to the module system. A balance is sought between introducing restrictions that guarantee the compositionality of the semantics and enforce a good programming style in ASP, and avoiding restrictions on the module hierarchy for the sake of flexibility of knowledge representation. To justify a replacement of a module with another, that is, to be able to guarantee that changes made on the level of modules do not alter the semantics of the program when seen as an entity, a notion of equivalence for modules is provided. In close connection with the development of the compositional module architecture, a transformation from verification of equivalence to search for answer sets is developed. The translation-based approach makes it unnecessary to develop a dedicated tool for the equivalence verification task by allowing the direct use of existing ASP solvers. Translations and transformations between different problems, program classes, and formalisms are another central theme in the thesis. To guarantee efficiency and soundness of the translation-based approach, certain syntactical and semantical properties of transformations are desirable, in terms of translation time, solution correspondence between the original and the transformed problem, and locality/globality of a particular transformation. In certain cases a more refined notion of minimality than that inherent in ASP can make program encodings more intuitive. Lifschitz' parallel and prioritized circumscription offer a solution in which certain atoms are allowed to vary or to have fixed values while others are falsified as far as possible according to priority classes. In this thesis a linear and faithful transformation embedding parallel and prioritized circumscription into ASP is provided. This enhances the knowledge representation capabilities of answer set programming by allowing the use of existing ASP solvers for computing parallel and prioritized circumscription

Neuere Entwicklungen der deklarativen KI-Programmierung : proceedings

The field of declarative AI programming is briefly characterized. Its recent developments in Germany are reflected by a workshop as part of the scientific congress KI-93 at the Berlin Humboldt University. Three tutorials introduce to the state of the art in deductive databases, the programming language Gödel, and the evolution of knowledge bases. Eleven contributed papers treat knowledge revision/program transformation, types, constraints, and type-constraint combinations

Machine learning for function synthesis

Function synthesis is the process of automatically constructing functions that satisfy a given specification. The space of functions as well as the format of the specifications vary greatly with each area of application. In this thesis, we consider synthesis in the context of satisfiability modulo theories. Within this domain, the goal is to synthesise mathematical expressions that adhere to abstract logical formulas. These types of synthesis problems find many applications in the field of computer-aided verification. One of the main challenges of function synthesis arises from the combinatorial explosion in the number of potential candidates within a certain size. The hypothesis of this thesis is that machine learning methods can be applied to make function synthesis more tractable. The first contribution of this thesis is a Monte-Carlo based search method for function synthesis. The search algorithm uses machine learned heuristics to guide the search. This is part of a reinforcement learning loop that trains the machine learning models with data generated from previous search attempts. To increase the set of benchmark problems to train and test synthesis methods, we also present a technique for generating synthesis problems from pre-existing satisfiability modulo theories problems. We implement the Monte-Carlo based synthesis algorithm and evaluate it on standard synthesis benchmarks as well as our newly generated benchmarks. An experimental evaluation shows that the learned heuristics greatly improve on the baseline without trained models. Furthermore, the machine learned guidance demonstrates comparable performance to CVC5 and, in some experiments, even surpasses it. Next, this thesis explores the application of machine learning to more restricted function synthesis domains. We hypothesise that narrowing the scope enables the use of machine learning techniques that are not possible in the general setting. We test this hypothesis by considering the problem of ranking function synthesis. Ranking functions are used in program analysis to prove termination of programs by mapping consecutive program states to decreasing elements of a well-founded set. The second contribution of this dissertation is a novel technique for synthesising ranking functions, using neural networks. The key insight is that instead of synthesising a mathematical expression that represents a ranking function, we can train a neural network to act as a ranking function. Hence, the synthesis procedure is replaced by neural network training. We introduce Neural Termination Analysis as a framework that leverages this. We train neural networks from sampled execution traces of the program we want to prove terminating. We enforce the synthesis specifications of ranking functions using the loss function and network design. After training, we use symbolic reasoning to formally verify that the resulting function is indeed a correct ranking function for the target program. We demonstrate that our method succeeds in synthesising ranking functions for programs that are beyond the reach of state-of-the-art tools. This includes programs with disjunctions and non-linear expressions in the loop guards