13,799 research outputs found
Automatic Emphysema Detection using Weakly Labeled HRCT Lung Images
A method for automatically quantifying emphysema regions using
High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scans of patients with chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that does not require manually annotated
scans for training is presented. HRCT scans of controls and of COPD patients
with diverse disease severity are acquired at two different centers. Textural
features from co-occurrence matrices and Gaussian filter banks are used to
characterize the lung parenchyma in the scans. Two robust versions of multiple
instance learning (MIL) classifiers, miSVM and MILES, are investigated. The
classifiers are trained with the weak labels extracted from the forced
expiratory volume in one minute (FEV) and diffusing capacity of the lungs
for carbon monoxide (DLCO). At test time, the classifiers output a patient
label indicating overall COPD diagnosis and local labels indicating the
presence of emphysema. The classifier performance is compared with manual
annotations by two radiologists, a classical density based method, and
pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The miSVM classifier performed better than
MILES on both patient and emphysema classification. The classifier has a
stronger correlation with PFT than the density based method, the percentage of
emphysema in the intersection of annotations from both radiologists, and the
percentage of emphysema annotated by one of the radiologists. The correlation
between the classifier and the PFT is only outperformed by the second
radiologist. The method is therefore promising for facilitating assessment of
emphysema and reducing inter-observer variability.Comment: Accepted at PLoS ON
Multiple Instance Learning: A Survey of Problem Characteristics and Applications
Multiple instance learning (MIL) is a form of weakly supervised learning
where training instances are arranged in sets, called bags, and a label is
provided for the entire bag. This formulation is gaining interest because it
naturally fits various problems and allows to leverage weakly labeled data.
Consequently, it has been used in diverse application fields such as computer
vision and document classification. However, learning from bags raises
important challenges that are unique to MIL. This paper provides a
comprehensive survey of the characteristics which define and differentiate the
types of MIL problems. Until now, these problem characteristics have not been
formally identified and described. As a result, the variations in performance
of MIL algorithms from one data set to another are difficult to explain. In
this paper, MIL problem characteristics are grouped into four broad categories:
the composition of the bags, the types of data distribution, the ambiguity of
instance labels, and the task to be performed. Methods specialized to address
each category are reviewed. Then, the extent to which these characteristics
manifest themselves in key MIL application areas are described. Finally,
experiments are conducted to compare the performance of 16 state-of-the-art MIL
methods on selected problem characteristics. This paper provides insight on how
the problem characteristics affect MIL algorithms, recommendations for future
benchmarking and promising avenues for research
- …