Tangential Extremal Principles for Finite and Infinite Systems of Sets, II: Applications to Semi-infinite and Multiobjective Optimization

This paper contains selected applications of the new tangential extremal principles and related results developed in Part I to calculus rules for infinite intersections of sets and optimality conditions for problems of semi-infinite programming and multiobjective optimization with countable constraint

Bad semidefinite programs: they all look the same

Conic linear programs, among them semidefinite programs, often behave pathologically: the optimal values of the primal and dual programs may differ, and may not be attained. We present a novel analysis of these pathological behaviors. We call a conic linear system $Ax <= b$ {\em badly behaved} if the value of $\sup { | A x <= b }$ is finite but the dual program has no solution with the same value for {\em some} $c.$ We describe simple and intuitive geometric characterizations of badly behaved conic linear systems. Our main motivation is the striking similarity of badly behaved semidefinite systems in the literature; we characterize such systems by certain {\em excluded matrices}, which are easy to spot in all published examples. We show how to transform semidefinite systems into a canonical form, which allows us to easily verify whether they are badly behaved. We prove several other structural results about badly behaved semidefinite systems; for example, we show that they are in $NP \cap co-NP$ in the real number model of computing. As a byproduct, we prove that all linear maps that act on symmetric matrices can be brought into a canonical form; this canonical form allows us to easily check whether the image of the semidefinite cone under the given linear map is closed.Comment: For some reason, the intended changes between versions 4 and 5 did not take effect, so versions 4 and 5 are the same. So version 6 is the final version. The only difference between version 4 and version 6 is that 2 typos were fixed: in the last displayed formula on page 6, "7" was replaced by "1"; and in the 4th displayed formula on page 12 "A_1 - A_2 - A_3" was replaced by "A_3 - A_2 - A_1