Why and When Can Deep -- but Not Shallow -- Networks Avoid the Curse of Dimensionality: a Review

The paper characterizes classes of functions for which deep learning can be exponentially better than shallow learning. Deep convolutional networks are a special case of these conditions, though weight sharing is not the main reason for their exponential advantage

Optimal approximation of piecewise smooth functions using deep ReLU neural networks

We study the necessary and sufficient complexity of ReLU neural networks---in terms of depth and number of weights---which is required for approximating classifier functions in $L^2$. As a model class, we consider the set $\mathcal{E}^\beta (\mathbb R^d)$ of possibly discontinuous piecewise $C^\beta$ functions $f : [-1/2, 1/2]^d \to \mathbb R$, where the different smooth regions of $f$ are separated by $C^\beta$ hypersurfaces. For dimension $d \geq 2$, regularity $\beta > 0$, and accuracy $\varepsilon > 0$, we construct artificial neural networks with ReLU activation function that approximate functions from $\mathcal{E}^\beta(\mathbb R^d)$ up to $L^2$ error of $\varepsilon$. The constructed networks have a fixed number of layers, depending only on $d$ and $\beta$, and they have $O(\varepsilon^{-2(d-1)/\beta})$ many nonzero weights, which we prove to be optimal. In addition to the optimality in terms of the number of weights, we show that in order to achieve the optimal approximation rate, one needs ReLU networks of a certain depth. Precisely, for piecewise $C^\beta(\mathbb R^d)$ functions, this minimal depth is given---up to a multiplicative constant---by $\beta/d$. Up to a log factor, our constructed networks match this bound. This partly explains the benefits of depth for ReLU networks by showing that deep networks are necessary to achieve efficient approximation of (piecewise) smooth functions. Finally, we analyze approximation in high-dimensional spaces where the function $f$ to be approximated can be factorized into a smooth dimension reducing feature map $\tau$ and classifier function $g$---defined on a low-dimensional feature space---as $f = g \circ \tau$. We show that in this case the approximation rate depends only on the dimension of the feature space and not the input dimension.Comment: Generalized some estimates to $L^p$ norms for $0<p<\infty

Approximation Error Bounds via Rademacher's Complexity

Approximation properties of some connectionistic models, commonly used to construct approximation schemes for optimization problems with multivariable functions as admissible solutions, are investigated. Such models are made up of linear combinations of computational units with adjustable parameters. The relationship between model complexity (number of computational units) and approximation error is investigated using tools from Statistical Learning Theory, such as Talagrand's inequality, fat-shattering dimension, and Rademacher's complexity. For some families of multivariable functions, estimates of the approximation accuracy of models with certain computational units are derived in dependence of the Rademacher's complexities of the families. The estimates improve previously-available ones, which were expressed in terms of V C dimension and derived by exploiting union-bound techniques. The results are applied to approximation schemes with certain radial-basis-functions as computational units, for which it is shown that the estimates do not exhibit the curse of dimensionality with respect to the number of variables