Designing NULL Convention Combinational Circuits to Fully Utilize Gate-Level Pipelining for Maximum Throughput

Since the NULL Convention Logic (NCL) paradigm is delay-insensitive, NCL combinational circuits cannot be partitioned indiscriminately when pipelining, as can clocked circuits. Instead, these circuits must be partitioned into stages, such that each stage is inputcomplete with respect to all of its inputs and delayinsensitivity is maintained. Therefore the selected architecture for an NCL circuit may vary depending on whether or not the given circuit is to be pipelined. For example, the combinational circuit that has the shortest critical path may not necessarily result in optimal throughput when pipelined. This paper presents a method called Threshold Combinational Reduction for Pipelining (TCRP), t

Generic algorithms and NULL Convention Logic hardware implementation for unsigned and signed quad-rail multiplication

This thesis focuses on designing generic quad-rail arithmetic circuits, such as signed and unsigned multipliers and Multiply and Accumulate (MAC) units, using the asynchronous delay-insensitive NULL Convention Logic (NCL) paradigm. This work helps to build a library of reusable components to be used for automated NCL circuit synthesis, which will aid in the integration of asynchronous design paradigms into the semiconductor industry --Abstract, page iii

Null convention logic circuits for asynchronous computer architecture

For most of its history, computer architecture has been able to benefit from a rapid scaling in semiconductor technology, resulting in continuous improvements to CPU design. During that period, synchronous logic has dominated because of its inherent ease of design and abundant tools. However, with the scaling of semiconductor processes into deep sub-micron and then to nano-scale dimensions, computer architecture is hitting a number of roadblocks such as high power and increased process variability. Asynchronous techniques can potentially offer many advantages compared to conventional synchronous design, including average case vs. worse case performance, robustness in the face of process and operating point variability and the ready availability of high performance, fine grained pipeline architectures. Of the many alternative approaches to asynchronous design, Null Convention Logic (NCL) has the advantage that its quasi delay-insensitive behavior makes it relatively easy to set up complex circuits without the need for exhaustive timing analysis. This thesis examines the characteristics of an NCL based asynchronous RISC-V CPU and analyses the problems with applying NCL to CPU design. While a number of university and industry groups have previously developed small 8-bit microprocessor architectures using NCL techniques, it is still unclear whether these offer any real advantages over conventional synchronous design. A key objective of this work has been to analyse the impact of larger word widths and more complex architectures on NCL CPU implementations. The research commenced by re-evaluating existing techniques for implementing NCL on programmable devices such as FPGAs. The little work that has been undertaken previously on FPGA implementations of asynchronous logic has been inconclusive and seems to indicate that asynchronous systems cannot be easily implemented in these devices. However, most of this work related to an alternative technique called bundled data, which is not well suited to FPGA implementation because of the difficulty in controlling and matching delays in a 'bundle' of signals. On the other hand, this thesis clearly shows that such applications are not only possible with NCL, but there are some distinct advantages in being able to prototype complex asynchronous systems in a field-programmable technology such as the FPGA. A large part of the value of NCL derives from its architectural level behavior, inherent pipelining, and optimization opportunities such as the merging of register and combina- tional logic functions. In this work, a number of NCL multiplier architectures have been analyzed to reveal the performance trade-offs between various non-pipelined, 1D and 2D organizations. Two-dimensional pipelining can easily be applied to regular architectures such as array multipliers in a way that is both high performance and area-efficient. It was found that the performance of 2D pipelining for small networks such as multipliers is around 260% faster than the equivalent non-pipelined design. However, the design uses 265% more transistors so the methodology is mainly of benefit where performance is strongly favored over area. A pipelined 32bit x 32bit signed Baugh-Wooley multiplier with Wallace-Tree Carry Save Adders (CSA), which is representative of a real design used for CPUs and DSPs, was used to further explore this concept as it is faster and has fewer pipeline stages compared to the normal array multiplier using Ripple-Carry adders (RCA). It was found that 1D pipelining with ripple-carry chains is an efficient implementation option but becomes less so for larger multipliers, due to the completion logic for which the delay time depends largely on the number of bits involved in the completion network. The average-case performance of ripple-carry adders was explored using random input vectors and it was observed that it offers little advantage on the smaller multiplier blocks, but this particular timing characteristic of asynchronous design styles be- comes increasingly more important as word size grows. Finally, this research has resulted in the development of the first 32-Bit asynchronous RISC-V CPU core. Called the Redback RISC, the architecture is a structure of pipeline rings composed of computational oscillations linked with flow completeness relationships. It has been written using NELL, a commercial description/synthesis tool that outputs standard Verilog. The Redback has been analysed and compared to two approximately equivalent industry standard 32-Bit synchronous RISC-V cores (PicoRV32 and Rocket) that are already fabricated and used in industry. While the NCL implementation is larger than both commercial cores it has similar performance and lower power compared to the PicoRV32. The implementation results were also compared against an existing NCL design tool flow (UNCLE), which showed how much the results of these implementation strategies differ. The Redback RISC has achieved similar level of throughput and 43% better power and 34% better energy compared to one of the synchronous cores with the same benchmark test and test condition such as input sup- ply voltage. However, it was shown that area is the biggest drawback for NCL CPU design. The core is roughly 2.5× larger than synchronous designs. On the other hand its area is still 2.9× smaller than previous designs using UNCLE tools. The area penalty is largely due to the unavoidable translation into a dual-rail topology when using the standard NCL cell library