A Procedure for the Selection of Connectives: How Deep Is the Surface?

We present an implemented procedure to select an appropriate connective to link two propositions. Each connective is defined as a set of constraints between features of the propositions it connects. Our focus has been to identify pragmatic features that can be produced by a deep generator to provide a simple representation of connectives. Using these features, we can account for a variety of connective usages. We describe how a surface generator can produce complex sentences when given these features in input. The selection procedure is implemented as part of a large functional unification grammar

Interactive Multimedia Explanation for Equipment Maintenance and Repair

COMET (COordinated Multimedia Explanation Testbed) is a research system that we are developing to explore the coordinated generation of multimedia explanations of equipment maintenance and repair procedures. The form and content of all material presented is generated interactively, with an emphasis on coordinating multiple media to allow cross-references between media and to make possible display layout that reflects the fine-grain relationships among the material presented. COMET's architecture includes multiple static and dynamic knowledge sources, a content planner, a media coordinator, media generators (currently text and graphics), and a media layout manager. Examples are given of the kinds of material processed and produced by each of the components

A Contrastive Study of Functional Unification Grammar for Surface Language Generation: A Case Study in Choice of Connectives

Language generation systems have used a variety of grammatical formalisms for producing syntactic structure and yet, there has been little research evaluating the formalisms for the specifics of the generation task. In our work at Columbia we have primarily used a unification based formalism, a Functional Unification Grammar (FUG) [Kay 79] and have found it well suited for many of the generation tasks we have addressed. Over the course of the past 5 years we have also explored the use of various off-the-shelf parsing formalisms, including an Augmented Transition Network (ATN) [Woods 701], a Bottom-Up Chart Parser (SUP) [Finin 84], and a Declarative Clause Grammar (DCG) [Pereira and Warren 80]. In contrast, we have found that parsing formalisms do not have the same benefits for the generation task

Generierung von natürlichsprachlichen Texten aus semantischen Strukturen im Prozeß der maschinellen Übersetzung - Allgemeine Strukturen und Abbildungen

0 VORWORT Bei der maschinellen Übersetzung natürlicher Sprache dominieren mehrere Probleme. Man hat es immer mit sehr großen Datenmengen zu tun. Auch wenn man nur einen kleinen Text übersetzen will, ist diese Aufgabe in umfänglichen Kontext eingebettet, d.h. alles Wissen über Quell- und Zielsprache muß - in möglichst formalisierter Form - zur Verfügung stehen. Handelt es sich um gesprochenes Wort treten Spracherkennungs- und Sprachausgabeaufgaben sowie harte Echtzeitforderungen hinzu. Die Komplexität des Problems ist - auch unter Benutzung moderner Softwareentwicklungskonzepte - für jeden, der eine Implementation versucht, eine nicht zu unterschätzende Herausforderung. Ansätze, die die Arbeitsprinzipien und Methoden der Informatik konsequent nutzen, stellen ihre Ergebnisse meist nur prototyisch für einen sehr kleinen Teil der Sprache -etwa eine Phrase, einen Satz bzw. mehrere Beispielsätze- heraus und folgern mehr oder weniger induktiv, daß die entwickelte Lösung auch auf die ganze Sprache erfolgreich angewendet werden kann, wenn man nur genügend „Lemminge“ hat, die nach allen Seiten ausschwärmend, die „noch notwendigen Routinearbeiten“ schnell und bienenfleißig ausführen könnten.:0 Vorwort S. 2 1 Allgemeiner Ablauf der Generierung S. 3 1.1 AUFGABE DER GENERIERUNG S. 3 1.2 EINORDNUNG DER GENERIERUNG IN DIE MASCHINELLE ÜBERSETZUNG S.4 1.3 REALISIERUNG S. 4 1.4 MORPHOLOGISCHE GENERIERUNG S.6 2 Strukturen und Abbildungen S. 8 2.1 UNIVERSELLE STRUKTUR: DEFINITION VON GRAPHEN S.8 2.2 FORMALISIERUNG SPEZIELLER SEMANTISCHER STRUKTUREN ALS GRAPHEN S.9 2.3 ABBILDUNG VON STRUKTUREN S.11 2.3.1 Strukturtyperhaltende Funktionen S. 12 2.3.2 Strukturtypverändernde Funktionen S. 19 2.3.3 Komplexe Funktionen S. 20 2.3.4 Abbildung eines gesamten Generierungsprozesses S. 21 4 Beispiel: Generierung von Texten aus prädikatenlogischen Ausdrücken (inkrementeller Algorithmus) S. 23 4.1 ABLAUF S.23 4.2 BEISPIELE VON REGELSTRUKTUREN S.27 5 Zusammenfassung S. 28 6 Quellenverzeichnis S. 3

Semantic Analysis of the Thai Language

Computing and Information Science

Planning multisentential English text using communicative acts

The goal of this research is to develop explanation presentation mechanisms for knowledge based systems which enable them to define domain terminology and concepts, narrate events, elucidate plans, processes, or propositions and argue to support a claim or advocate action. This requires the development of devices which select, structure, order and then linguistically realize explanation content as coherent and cohesive English text. With the goal of identifying generic explanation presentation strategies, a wide range of naturally occurring texts were analyzed with respect to their communicative sttucture, function, content and intended effects on the reader. This motivated an integrated theory of communicative acts which characterizes text at the level of rhetorical acts (e.g., describe, define, narrate), illocutionary acts (e.g., inform, request), and locutionary acts (e.g., ask, command). Taken as a whole, the identified communicative acts characterize the structure, content and intended effects of four types of text: description, narration, exposition, argument. These text types have distinct effects such as getting the reader to know about entities, to know about events, to understand plans, processes, or propositions, or to believe propositions or want to perform actions. In addition to identifying the communicative function and effect of text at multiple levels of abstraction, this dissertation details a tripartite theory of focus of attention (discourse focus, temporal focus, and spatial focus) which constrains the planning and linguistic realization of text. To test the integrated theory of communicative acts and tripartite theory of focus of attention, a text generation system TEXPLAN (Textual EXplanation PLANner) was implemented that plans and linguistically realizes multisentential and multiparagraph explanations from knowledge based systems. The communicative acts identified during text analysis were formalized as over sixty compositional and (in some cases) recursive plan operators in the library of a hierarchical planner. Discourse, temporal, and spatial focus models were implemented to track and use attentional information to guide the organization and realization of text. Because the plan operators distinguish between the communicative function (e.g., argue for a proposition) and the expected effect (e.g., the reader believes the proposition) of communicative acts, the system is able to construct a discourse model of the structure and function of its textual responses as well as a user model of the expected effects of its responses on the reader's knowledge, beliefs, and desires. The system uses both the discourse model and user model to guide subsequent utterances. To test its generality, the system was interfaced to a variety of domain applications including a neuropsychological diagnosis system, a mission planning system, and a knowledge based mission simulator. The system produces descriptions, narrations, expositions, and arguments from these applications, thus exhibiting a broader range of rhetorical coverage than previous text generation systems