202 research outputs found
Geometric representations for minimalist grammars
We reformulate minimalist grammars as partial functions on term algebras for
strings and trees. Using filler/role bindings and tensor product
representations, we construct homomorphisms for these data structures into
geometric vector spaces. We prove that the structure-building functions as well
as simple processors for minimalist languages can be realized by piecewise
linear operators in representation space. We also propose harmony, i.e. the
distance of an intermediate processing step from the final well-formed state in
representation space, as a measure of processing complexity. Finally, we
illustrate our findings by means of two particular arithmetic and fractal
representations.Comment: 43 pages, 4 figure
Recommended from our members
Comparing methods of tree-construction across mildly context-sensitive formalisms
On Folding and Twisting (and whatknot): towards a characterization of workspaces in syntax
Syntactic theory has traditionally adopted a constructivist approach, in
which a set of atomic elements are manipulated by combinatory operations to
yield derived, complex elements. Syntactic structure is thus seen as the result
or discrete recursive combinatorics over lexical items which get assembled into
phrases, which are themselves combined to form sentences. This view is common
to European and American structuralism (e.g., Benveniste, 1971; Hockett, 1958)
and different incarnations of generative grammar, transformational and
non-transformational (Chomsky, 1956, 1995; and Kaplan & Bresnan, 1982; Gazdar,
1982). Since at least Uriagereka (2002), there has been some attention paid to
the fact that syntactic operations must apply somewhere, particularly when
copying and movement operations are considered. Contemporary syntactic theory
has thus somewhat acknowledged the importance of formalizing aspects of the
spaces in which elements are manipulated, but it is still a vastly
underexplored area. In this paper we explore the consequences of
conceptualizing syntax as a set of topological operations applying over spaces
rather than over discrete elements. We argue that there are empirical
advantages in such a view for the treatment of long-distance dependencies and
cross-derivational dependencies: constraints on possible configurations emerge
from the dynamics of the system.Comment: Manuscript. Do not cite without permission. Comments welcom
Why Unaccusatives Have it Easy: Reduced Relative Garden Path Effects and Verb Type
This paper provides a new account for why unaccusative verbs are easier to process than unergative verbs in the reduced relative garden path construction, as demonstrated in Stevenson and Merlo [1997]. Reanalysis to the passivized reduced relative clause form requires the verb to be causative. Stevenson and Merlo [1997] argued that unaccusatives are causativized in the lexicon, while unergatives are causativized in the syntax. This account argues instead that an independently attested co-occurrence restriction contributes to greater initial ambiguity in the unergative case; causative unergatives require an argument/directional attachment of prepositional phrase [Hoekstra, 1988, Levin and Rappaport-Hovav, 1995, Folli and Harley, 2006].We implement the unergative-PP co-occurrence restriction in Minimalist Grammars [Stabler, 1997]. We model the contribution of prepositional phrase ambiguity to unergative reduced relative ambiguity with Entropy Reduction [Hale, 2003]. We obtain greater Entropy Reductions for the unergative condition, modeling that human comprehenders are more taxed by compounded ambiguity
- âŠ