1,027 research outputs found

    Distributed local approximation algorithms for maximum matching in graphs and hypergraphs

    Full text link
    We describe approximation algorithms in Linial's classic LOCAL model of distributed computing to find maximum-weight matchings in a hypergraph of rank rr. Our main result is a deterministic algorithm to generate a matching which is an O(r)O(r)-approximation to the maximum weight matching, running in O~(rlogΔ+log2Δ+logn)\tilde O(r \log \Delta + \log^2 \Delta + \log^* n) rounds. (Here, the O~()\tilde O() notations hides polyloglog Δ\text{polyloglog } \Delta and polylog r\text{polylog } r factors). This is based on a number of new derandomization techniques extending methods of Ghaffari, Harris & Kuhn (2017). As a main application, we obtain nearly-optimal algorithms for the long-studied problem of maximum-weight graph matching. Specifically, we get a (1+ϵ)(1+\epsilon) approximation algorithm using O~(logΔ/ϵ3+polylog(1/ϵ,loglogn))\tilde O(\log \Delta / \epsilon^3 + \text{polylog}(1/\epsilon, \log \log n)) randomized time and O~(log2Δ/ϵ4+logn/ϵ)\tilde O(\log^2 \Delta / \epsilon^4 + \log^*n / \epsilon) deterministic time. The second application is a faster algorithm for hypergraph maximal matching, a versatile subroutine introduced in Ghaffari et al. (2017) for a variety of local graph algorithms. This gives an algorithm for (2Δ1)(2 \Delta - 1)-edge-list coloring in O~(log2Δlogn)\tilde O(\log^2 \Delta \log n) rounds deterministically or O~((loglogn)3)\tilde O( (\log \log n)^3 ) rounds randomly. Another consequence (with additional optimizations) is an algorithm which generates an edge-orientation with out-degree at most (1+ϵ)λ\lceil (1+\epsilon) \lambda \rceil for a graph of arboricity λ\lambda; for fixed ϵ\epsilon this runs in O~(log6n)\tilde O(\log^6 n) rounds deterministically or O~(log3n)\tilde O(\log^3 n ) rounds randomly

    Improved Pseudorandom Generators from Pseudorandom Multi-Switching Lemmas

    Get PDF
    We give the best known pseudorandom generators for two touchstone classes in unconditional derandomization: an ε\varepsilon-PRG for the class of size-MM depth-dd AC0\mathsf{AC}^0 circuits with seed length log(M)d+O(1)log(1/ε)\log(M)^{d+O(1)}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon), and an ε\varepsilon-PRG for the class of SS-sparse F2\mathbb{F}_2 polynomials with seed length 2O(logS)log(1/ε)2^{O(\sqrt{\log S})}\cdot \log(1/\varepsilon). These results bring the state of the art for unconditional derandomization of these classes into sharp alignment with the state of the art for computational hardness for all parameter settings: improving on the seed lengths of either PRG would require breakthrough progress on longstanding and notorious circuit lower bounds. The key enabling ingredient in our approach is a new \emph{pseudorandom multi-switching lemma}. We derandomize recently-developed \emph{multi}-switching lemmas, which are powerful generalizations of H{\aa}stad's switching lemma that deal with \emph{families} of depth-two circuits. Our pseudorandom multi-switching lemma---a randomness-efficient algorithm for sampling restrictions that simultaneously simplify all circuits in a family---achieves the parameters obtained by the (full randomness) multi-switching lemmas of Impagliazzo, Matthews, and Paturi [IMP12] and H{\aa}stad [H{\aa}s14]. This optimality of our derandomization translates into the optimality (given current circuit lower bounds) of our PRGs for AC0\mathsf{AC}^0 and sparse F2\mathbb{F}_2 polynomials

    On Derandomizing Local Distributed Algorithms

    Full text link
    The gap between the known randomized and deterministic local distributed algorithms underlies arguably the most fundamental and central open question in distributed graph algorithms. In this paper, we develop a generic and clean recipe for derandomizing LOCAL algorithms. We also exhibit how this simple recipe leads to significant improvements on a number of problem. Two main results are: - An improved distributed hypergraph maximal matching algorithm, improving on Fischer, Ghaffari, and Kuhn [FOCS'17], and giving improved algorithms for edge-coloring, maximum matching approximation, and low out-degree edge orientation. The first gives an improved algorithm for Open Problem 11.4 of the book of Barenboim and Elkin, and the last gives the first positive resolution of their Open Problem 11.10. - An improved distributed algorithm for the Lov\'{a}sz Local Lemma, which gets closer to a conjecture of Chang and Pettie [FOCS'17], and moreover leads to improved distributed algorithms for problems such as defective coloring and kk-SAT.Comment: 37 page

    Pseudorandomness for Approximate Counting and Sampling

    Get PDF
    We study computational procedures that use both randomness and nondeterminism. The goal of this paper is to derandomize such procedures under the weakest possible assumptions. Our main technical contribution allows one to “boost” a given hardness assumption: We show that if there is a problem in EXP that cannot be computed by poly-size nondeterministic circuits then there is one which cannot be computed by poly-size circuits that make non-adaptive NP oracle queries. This in particular shows that the various assumptions used over the last few years by several authors to derandomize Arthur-Merlin games (i.e., show AM = NP) are in fact all equivalent. We also define two new primitives that we regard as the natural pseudorandom objects associated with approximate counting and sampling of NP-witnesses. We use the “boosting” theorem and hashing techniques to construct these primitives using an assumption that is no stronger than that used to derandomize AM. We observe that Cai's proof that S_2^P ⊆ PP⊆(NP) and the learning algorithm of Bshouty et al. can be seen as reductions to sampling that are not probabilistic. As a consequence they can be derandomized under an assumption which is weaker than the assumption that was previously known to suffice

    An Atypical Survey of Typical-Case Heuristic Algorithms

    Full text link
    Heuristic approaches often do so well that they seem to pretty much always give the right answer. How close can heuristic algorithms get to always giving the right answer, without inducing seismic complexity-theoretic consequences? This article first discusses how a series of results by Berman, Buhrman, Hartmanis, Homer, Longpr\'{e}, Ogiwara, Sch\"{o}ening, and Watanabe, from the early 1970s through the early 1990s, explicitly or implicitly limited how well heuristic algorithms can do on NP-hard problems. In particular, many desirable levels of heuristic success cannot be obtained unless severe, highly unlikely complexity class collapses occur. Second, we survey work initiated by Goldreich and Wigderson, who showed how under plausible assumptions deterministic heuristics for randomized computation can achieve a very high frequency of correctness. Finally, we consider formal ways in which theory can help explain the effectiveness of heuristics that solve NP-hard problems in practice.Comment: This article is currently scheduled to appear in the December 2012 issue of SIGACT New

    Efficient Approximation Algorithms for Multi-Antennae Largest Weight Data Retrieval

    Full text link
    In a mobile network, wireless data broadcast over mm channels (frequencies) is a powerful means for distributed dissemination of data to clients who access the channels through multi-antennae equipped on their mobile devices. The δ\delta-antennae largest weight data retrieval (δ\deltaALWDR) problem is to compute a schedule for downloading a subset of data items that has a maximum total weight using δ\delta antennae in a given time interval. In this paper, we propose a ratio 11eϵ1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon approximation algorithm for the δ\delta-antennae largest weight data retrieval (δ\deltaALWDR) problem that has the same ratio as the known result but a significantly improved time complexity of O(21ϵ1ϵm7T3.5L)O(2^{\frac{1}{\epsilon}}\frac{1}{\epsilon}m^{7}T^{3.5}L) from O(ϵ3.5m3.5ϵT3.5L)O(\epsilon^{3.5}m^{\frac{3.5}{\epsilon}}T^{3.5}L) when δ=1\delta=1 \cite{lu2014data}. To our knowledge, our algorithm represents the first ratio 11eϵ1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon approximation solution to δ\deltaALWDR for the general case of arbitrary δ\delta. To achieve this, we first give a ratio 11e1-\frac{1}{e} algorithm for the γ\gamma-separated δ\deltaALWDR (δ\deltaAγ\gammaLWDR) with runtime O(m7T3.5L)O(m^{7}T^{3.5}L), under the assumption that every data item appears at most once in each segment of δ\deltaAγ\gammaLWDR, for any input of maximum length LL on mm channels in TT time slots. Then, we show that we can retain the same ratio for δ\deltaAγ\gammaLWDR without this assumption at the cost of increased time complexity to O(2γm7T3.5L)O(2^{\gamma}m^{7}T^{3.5}L). This result immediately yields an approximation solution of same ratio and time complexity for δ\deltaALWDR, presenting a significant improvement of the known time complexity of ratio 11eϵ1-\frac{1}{e}-\epsilon approximation to the problem
    corecore