Highly saturated packings and reduced coverings

We introduce and study certain notions which might serve as substitutes for maximum density packings and minimum density coverings. A body is a compact connected set which is the closure of its interior. A packing $\cal P$ with congruent replicas of a body $K$ is $n$-saturated if no $n-1$ members of it can be replaced with $n$ replicas of $K$, and it is completely saturated if it is $n$-saturated for each $n\ge 1$. Similarly, a covering $\cal C$ with congruent replicas of a body $K$ is $n$-reduced if no $n$ members of it can be replaced by $n-1$ replicas of $K$ without uncovering a portion of the space, and it is completely reduced if it is $n$-reduced for each $n\ge 1$. We prove that every body $K$ in $d$-dimensional Euclidean or hyperbolic space admits both an $n$-saturated packing and an $n$-reduced covering with replicas of $K$. Under some assumptions on $K\subset \mathbb{E}^d$ (somewhat weaker than convexity), we prove the existence of completely saturated packings and completely reduced coverings, but in general, the problem of existence of completely saturated packings and completely reduced coverings remains unsolved. Also, we investigate some problems related to the the densities of $n$-saturated packings and $n$-reduced coverings. Among other things, we prove that there exists an upper bound for the density of a $d+2$-reduced covering of $\mathbb{E}^d$ with congruent balls, and we produce some density bounds for the $n$-saturated packings and $n$-reduced coverings of the plane with congruent circles

On packing spheres into containers (about Kepler's finite sphere packing problem)

In an Euclidean $d$-space, the container problem asks to pack $n$ equally sized spheres into a minimal dilate of a fixed container. If the container is a smooth convex body and $d\geq 2$ we show that solutions to the container problem can not have a ``simple structure'' for large $n$. By this we in particular find that there exist arbitrary small $r>0$, such that packings in a smooth, 3-dimensional convex body, with a maximum number of spheres of radius $r$, are necessarily not hexagonal close packings. This contradicts Kepler's famous statement that the cubic or hexagonal close packing ``will be the tightest possible, so that in no other arrangement more spheres could be packed into the same container''.Comment: 13 pages, 2 figures; v2: major revision, extended result, simplified and clarified proo