First-Fit coloring of Cartesian product graphs and its defining sets

Let the vertices of a Cartesian product graph $G\Box H$ be ordered by an ordering $\sigma$. By the First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ we mean the vertex coloring procedure which scans the vertices according to the ordering $\sigma$ and for each vertex assigns the smallest available color. Let $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)$ be the number of colors used in this coloring. By introducing the concept of descent we obtain a sufficient condition to determine whether $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)=FF(G\Box H,\tau)$, where $\sigma$ and $\tau$ are arbitrary orders. We study and obtain some bounds for $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)$, where $\sigma$ is any quasi-lexicographic ordering. The First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ does not always yield an optimum coloring. A greedy defining set of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ is a subset $S$ of vertices in the graph together with a suitable pre-coloring of $S$ such that by fixing the colors of $S$ the First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ yields an optimum coloring. We show that the First-Fit coloring and greedy defining sets of $G\Box H$ with respect to any quasi-lexicographic ordering (including the known lexicographic order) are all the same. We obtain upper and lower bounds for the smallest cardinality of a greedy defining set in $G\Box H$, including some extremal results for Latin squares.Comment: Accepted for publication in Contributions to Discrete Mathematic

On the Computational Complexity of Defining Sets

Suppose we have a family ${\cal F}$ of sets. For every $S \in {\cal F}$, a set $D \subseteq S$ is a {\sf defining set} for $({\cal F},S)$ if $S$ is the only element of $\cal{F}$ that contains $D$ as a subset. This concept has been studied in numerous cases, such as vertex colorings, perfect matchings, dominating sets, block designs, geodetics, orientations, and Latin squares. In this paper, first, we propose the concept of a defining set of a logical formula, and we prove that the computational complexity of such a problem is $\Sigma_2$-complete. We also show that the computational complexity of the following problem about the defining set of vertex colorings of graphs is $\Sigma_2$-complete: {\sc Instance:} A graph $G$ with a vertex coloring $c$ and an integer $k$. {\sc Question:} If ${\cal C}(G)$ be the set of all $\chi(G)$-colorings of $G$, then does $({\cal C}(G),c)$ have a defining set of size at most $k$? Moreover, we study the computational complexity of some other variants of this problem

First-Fit coloring of Cartesian product graphs and its defining sets

Let the vertices of a Cartesian product graph $G\Box H$ be ordered by an ordering $\sigma$. By the First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ we mean the vertex coloring procedure which scans the vertices according to the ordering $\sigma$ and for each vertex assigns the smallest available color. Let $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)$ be the number of colors used in this coloring. By introducing the concept of descent we obtain a sufficient condition to determine whether $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)=FF(G\Box H,\tau)$, where $\sigma$ and $\tau$ are arbitrary orders. We study and obtain some bounds for $FF(G\Box H,\sigma)$, where $\sigma$ is any quasi-lexicographic ordering. The First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ does not always yield an optimum coloring. A greedy defining set of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ is a subset $S$ of vertices in the graph together with a suitable pre-coloring of $S$ such that by fixing the colors of $S$ the First-Fit coloring of $(G\Box H, \sigma)$ yields an optimum coloring. We show that the First-Fit coloring and greedy defining sets of $G\Box H$ with respect to any quasi-lexicographic ordering (including the known lexicographic order) are all the same. We obtain upper and lower bounds for the smallest cardinality of a greedy defining set in $G\Box H$, including some extremal results for Latin squares