36,788 research outputs found
Tool support for reasoning in display calculi
We present a tool for reasoning in and about propositional sequent calculi.
One aim is to support reasoning in calculi that contain a hundred rules or
more, so that even relatively small pen and paper derivations become tedious
and error prone. As an example, we implement the display calculus D.EAK of
dynamic epistemic logic. Second, we provide embeddings of the calculus in the
theorem prover Isabelle for formalising proofs about D.EAK. As a case study we
show that the solution of the muddy children puzzle is derivable for any number
of muddy children. Third, there is a set of meta-tools, that allows us to adapt
the tool for a wide variety of user defined calculi
An LTL Semantics of Business Workflows with Recovery
We describe a business workflow case study with abnormal behavior management
(i.e. recovery) and demonstrate how temporal logics and model checking can
provide a methodology to iteratively revise the design and obtain a correct-by
construction system. To do so we define a formal semantics by giving a
compilation of generic workflow patterns into LTL and we use the bound model
checker Zot to prove specific properties and requirements validity. The working
assumption is that such a lightweight approach would easily fit into processes
that are already in place without the need for a radical change of procedures,
tools and people's attitudes. The complexity of formalisms and invasiveness of
methods have been demonstrated to be one of the major drawback and obstacle for
deployment of formal engineering techniques into mundane projects
Matching Logic
This paper presents matching logic, a first-order logic (FOL) variant for
specifying and reasoning about structure by means of patterns and pattern
matching. Its sentences, the patterns, are constructed using variables,
symbols, connectives and quantifiers, but no difference is made between
function and predicate symbols. In models, a pattern evaluates into a power-set
domain (the set of values that match it), in contrast to FOL where functions
and predicates map into a regular domain. Matching logic uniformly generalizes
several logical frameworks important for program analysis, such as:
propositional logic, algebraic specification, FOL with equality, modal logic,
and separation logic. Patterns can specify separation requirements at any level
in any program configuration, not only in the heaps or stores, without any
special logical constructs for that: the very nature of pattern matching is
that if two structures are matched as part of a pattern, then they can only be
spatially separated. Like FOL, matching logic can also be translated into pure
predicate logic with equality, at the same time admitting its own sound and
complete proof system. A practical aspect of matching logic is that FOL
reasoning with equality remains sound, so off-the-shelf provers and SMT solvers
can be used for matching logic reasoning. Matching logic is particularly
well-suited for reasoning about programs in programming languages that have an
operational semantics, but it is not limited to this
All-Path Reachability Logic
This paper presents a language-independent proof system for reachability
properties of programs written in non-deterministic (e.g., concurrent)
languages, referred to as all-path reachability logic. It derives
partial-correctness properties with all-path semantics (a state satisfying a
given precondition reaches states satisfying a given postcondition on all
terminating execution paths). The proof system takes as axioms any
unconditional operational semantics, and is sound (partially correct) and
(relatively) complete, independent of the object language. The soundness has
also been mechanized in Coq. This approach is implemented in a tool for
semantics-based verification as part of the K framework (http://kframework.org
TAPAs: A Tool for the Analysis of Process Algebras
Process algebras are formalisms for modelling concurrent systems that permit mathematical reasoning with respect to a set of desired properties. TAPAs is a tool that can be used to support the use of process algebras to specify and analyze concurrent systems. It does not aim at guaranteeing high performances, but has been developed as a support to teaching. Systems are described as process algebras terms that are then mapped to labelled transition systems (LTSs). Properties are verified either by checking equivalence of concrete and abstract systems descriptions, or by model checking temporal formulae over the obtained LTS. A key feature of TAPAs, that makes it particularly suitable for teaching, is that it maintains a consistent double representation of each system both as a term and as a graph. Another useful didactical feature is the exhibition of counterexamples in case equivalences are not verified or the proposed formulae are not satisfied
Automated Game Design Learning
While general game playing is an active field of research, the learning of
game design has tended to be either a secondary goal of such research or it has
been solely the domain of humans. We propose a field of research, Automated
Game Design Learning (AGDL), with the direct purpose of learning game designs
directly through interaction with games in the mode that most people experience
games: via play. We detail existing work that touches the edges of this field,
describe current successful projects in AGDL and the theoretical foundations
that enable them, point to promising applications enabled by AGDL, and discuss
next steps for this exciting area of study. The key moves of AGDL are to use
game programs as the ultimate source of truth about their own design, and to
make these design properties available to other systems and avenues of inquiry.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures. Accepted for CIG 201
- …