8,052 research outputs found
Real-time and Probabilistic Temporal Logics: An Overview
Over the last two decades, there has been an extensive study on logical
formalisms for specifying and verifying real-time systems. Temporal logics have
been an important research subject within this direction. Although numerous
logics have been introduced for the formal specification of real-time and
complex systems, an up to date comprehensive analysis of these logics does not
exist in the literature. In this paper we analyse real-time and probabilistic
temporal logics which have been widely used in this field. We extrapolate the
notions of decidability, axiomatizability, expressiveness, model checking, etc.
for each logic analysed. We also provide a comparison of features of the
temporal logics discussed
Symbolic Abstractions for Quantum Protocol Verification
Quantum protocols such as the BB84 Quantum Key Distribution protocol exchange
qubits to achieve information-theoretic security guarantees. Many variants
thereof were proposed, some of them being already deployed. Existing security
proofs in that field are mostly tedious, error-prone pen-and-paper proofs of
the core protocol only that rarely account for other crucial components such as
authentication. This calls for formal and automated verification techniques
that exhaustively explore all possible intruder behaviors and that scale well.
The symbolic approach offers rigorous, mathematical frameworks and automated
tools to analyze security protocols. Based on well-designed abstractions, it
has allowed for large-scale formal analyses of real-life protocols such as TLS
1.3 and mobile telephony protocols. Hence a natural question is: Can we use
this successful line of work to analyze quantum protocols? This paper proposes
a first positive answer and motivates further research on this unexplored path
Model-based dependability analysis : state-of-the-art, challenges and future outlook
Abstract: Over the past two decades, the study of model-based dependability analysis has gathered significant research interest. Different approaches have been developed to automate and address various limitations of classical dependability techniques to contend with the increasing complexity and challenges of modern safety-critical system. Two leading paradigms have emerged, one which constructs predictive system failure models from component failure models compositionally using the topology of the system. The other utilizes design models - typically state automata - to explore system behaviour through fault injection. This paper reviews a number of prominent techniques under these two paradigms, and provides an insight into their working mechanism, applicability, strengths and challenges, as well as recent developments within these fields. We also discuss the emerging trends on integrated approaches and advanced analysis capabilities. Lastly, we outline the future outlook for model-based dependability analysis
Applying Formal Methods to Networking: Theory, Techniques and Applications
Despite its great importance, modern network infrastructure is remarkable for
the lack of rigor in its engineering. The Internet which began as a research
experiment was never designed to handle the users and applications it hosts
today. The lack of formalization of the Internet architecture meant limited
abstractions and modularity, especially for the control and management planes,
thus requiring for every new need a new protocol built from scratch. This led
to an unwieldy ossified Internet architecture resistant to any attempts at
formal verification, and an Internet culture where expediency and pragmatism
are favored over formal correctness. Fortunately, recent work in the space of
clean slate Internet design---especially, the software defined networking (SDN)
paradigm---offers the Internet community another chance to develop the right
kind of architecture and abstractions. This has also led to a great resurgence
in interest of applying formal methods to specification, verification, and
synthesis of networking protocols and applications. In this paper, we present a
self-contained tutorial of the formidable amount of work that has been done in
formal methods, and present a survey of its applications to networking.Comment: 30 pages, submitted to IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorial
Sciduction: Combining Induction, Deduction, and Structure for Verification and Synthesis
Even with impressive advances in automated formal methods, certain problems
in system verification and synthesis remain challenging. Examples include the
verification of quantitative properties of software involving constraints on
timing and energy consumption, and the automatic synthesis of systems from
specifications. The major challenges include environment modeling,
incompleteness in specifications, and the complexity of underlying decision
problems.
This position paper proposes sciduction, an approach to tackle these
challenges by integrating inductive inference, deductive reasoning, and
structure hypotheses. Deductive reasoning, which leads from general rules or
concepts to conclusions about specific problem instances, includes techniques
such as logical inference and constraint solving. Inductive inference, which
generalizes from specific instances to yield a concept, includes algorithmic
learning from examples. Structure hypotheses are used to define the class of
artifacts, such as invariants or program fragments, generated during
verification or synthesis. Sciduction constrains inductive and deductive
reasoning using structure hypotheses, and actively combines inductive and
deductive reasoning: for instance, deductive techniques generate examples for
learning, and inductive reasoning is used to guide the deductive engines.
We illustrate this approach with three applications: (i) timing analysis of
software; (ii) synthesis of loop-free programs, and (iii) controller synthesis
for hybrid systems. Some future applications are also discussed
Quantitative Safety: Linking Proof-Based Verification with Model Checking for Probabilistic Systems
This paper presents a novel approach for augmenting proof-based verification
with performance-style analysis of the kind employed in state-of-the-art model
checking tools for probabilistic systems. Quantitative safety properties
usually specified as probabilistic system invariants and modeled in proof-based
environments are evaluated using bounded model checking techniques.
Our specific contributions include the statement of a theorem that is central
to model checking safety properties of proof-based systems, the establishment
of a procedure; and its full implementation in a prototype system (YAGA) which
readily transforms a probabilistic model specified in a proof-based environment
to its equivalent verifiable PRISM model equipped with reward structures. The
reward structures capture the exact interpretation of the probabilistic
invariants and can reveal succinct information about the model during
experimental investigations. Finally, we demonstrate the novelty of the
technique on a probabilistic library case study
- âŠ