35,335 research outputs found

    The Algorithmic Complexity of Modular Decomposition

    Get PDF
    Modular decomposition is a thoroughly investigated topic inmany areas such as switching theory, reliability theory, game theory andgraph theory. We propose an O(mn)-algorithm for the recognition of amodular set of a monotone Boolean function f with m prime implicantsand n variables. Using this result we show that the computation ofthe modular closure of a set can be done in time O(mn2). On the otherhand, we prove that the recognition problem for general Boolean functions is NP-complete. Moreover, we introduce the so called generalizedShannon decomposition of a Boolean functions as an efficient tool forproving theorems on Boolean function decompositions.computational complexity;Boolean functions;decomposition algorithm;modular decomposition;substitution decomposition

    Fast Algebraic Attacks and Decomposition of Symmetric Boolean Functions

    Full text link
    Algebraic and fast algebraic attacks are power tools to analyze stream ciphers. A class of symmetric Boolean functions with maximum algebraic immunity were found vulnerable to fast algebraic attacks at EUROCRYPT'06. Recently, the notion of AAR (algebraic attack resistant) functions was introduced as a unified measure of protection against both classical algebraic and fast algebraic attacks. In this correspondence, we first give a decomposition of symmetric Boolean functions, then we show that almost all symmetric Boolean functions, including these functions with good algebraic immunity, behave badly against fast algebraic attacks, and we also prove that no symmetric Boolean functions are AAR functions. Besides, we improve the relations between algebraic degree and algebraic immunity of symmetric Boolean functions.Comment: 13 pages, submitted to IEEE Transactions on Information Theor

    Modular Decomposition of Boolean Functions

    Get PDF
    Modular decomposition is a thoroughly investigated topic in many areas such as switching theory, reliability theory, game theory and graph theory. Most appli- cations can be formulated in the framework of Boolean functions. In this paper we give a uni_ed treatment of modular decomposition of Boolean functions based on the idea of generalized Shannon decomposition. Furthermore, we discuss some new results on the complexity of modular decomposition. We propose an O(mn)- algorithm for the recognition of a modular set of a monotone Boolean function f with m prime implicants and n variables. Using this result we show that the the computation of the modular closure of a set can be done in time O(mn2). On the other hand, we prove that the recognition problem for general Boolean functions is coNP-complete

    Belief functions on lattices

    Get PDF
    We extend the notion of belief function to the case where the underlying structure is no more the Boolean lattice of subsets of some universal set, but any lattice, which we will endow with a minimal set of properties according to our needs. We show that all classical constructions and definitions (e.g., mass allocation, commonality function, plausibility functions, necessity measures with nested focal elements, possibility distributions, Dempster rule of combination, decomposition w.r.t. simple support functions, etc.) remain valid in this general setting. Moreover, our proof of decomposition of belief functions into simple support functions is much simpler and general than the original one by Shafer

    Boolean decomposition using two-literal divisors

    Get PDF
    This paper is an attempt to answer the following question: how much improvement can be obtained in logic decomposition by using Boolean divisors? Traditionally, the existence of too many Boolean divisors has been the main reason why Boolean decomposition has had limited success. This paper explores a new strategy based on the decomposition of Boolean functions by means of two-literal divisors. The strategy is shown to derive superior results while still maintaining an affordable complexity. The results show improvements of 15% on average, and up to 50% in some examples, w.r.t. algebraic decomposition.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
    • …
    corecore