6,921 research outputs found
Learning When Training Data are Costly: The Effect of Class Distribution on Tree Induction
For large, real-world inductive learning problems, the number of training
examples often must be limited due to the costs associated with procuring,
preparing, and storing the training examples and/or the computational costs
associated with learning from them. In such circumstances, one question of
practical importance is: if only n training examples can be selected, in what
proportion should the classes be represented? In this article we help to answer
this question by analyzing, for a fixed training-set size, the relationship
between the class distribution of the training data and the performance of
classification trees induced from these data. We study twenty-six data sets
and, for each, determine the best class distribution for learning. The
naturally occurring class distribution is shown to generally perform well when
classifier performance is evaluated using undifferentiated error rate (0/1
loss). However, when the area under the ROC curve is used to evaluate
classifier performance, a balanced distribution is shown to perform well. Since
neither of these choices for class distribution always generates the
best-performing classifier, we introduce a budget-sensitive progressive
sampling algorithm for selecting training examples based on the class
associated with each example. An empirical analysis of this algorithm shows
that the class distribution of the resulting training set yields classifiers
with good (nearly-optimal) classification performance
Software defect prediction: do different classifiers find the same defects?
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.During the last 10 years, hundreds of different defect prediction models have been published. The performance of the classifiers used in these models is reported to be similar with models rarely performing above the predictive performance ceiling of about 80% recall. We investigate the individual defects that four classifiers predict and analyse the level of prediction uncertainty produced by these classifiers. We perform a sensitivity analysis to compare the performance of Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, RPart and SVM classifiers when predicting defects in NASA, open source and commercial datasets. The defect predictions that each classifier makes is captured in a confusion matrix and the prediction uncertainty of each classifier is compared. Despite similar predictive performance values for these four classifiers, each detects different sets of defects. Some classifiers are more consistent in predicting defects than others. Our results confirm that a unique subset of defects can be detected by specific classifiers. However, while some classifiers are consistent in the predictions they make, other classifiers vary in their predictions. Given our results, we conclude that classifier ensembles with decision-making strategies not based on majority voting are likely to perform best in defect prediction.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
Distributed Online Big Data Classification Using Context Information
Distributed, online data mining systems have emerged as a result of
applications requiring analysis of large amounts of correlated and
high-dimensional data produced by multiple distributed data sources. We propose
a distributed online data classification framework where data is gathered by
distributed data sources and processed by a heterogeneous set of distributed
learners which learn online, at run-time, how to classify the different data
streams either by using their locally available classification functions or by
helping each other by classifying each other's data. Importantly, since the
data is gathered at different locations, sending the data to another learner to
process incurs additional costs such as delays, and hence this will be only
beneficial if the benefits obtained from a better classification will exceed
the costs. We model the problem of joint classification by the distributed and
heterogeneous learners from multiple data sources as a distributed contextual
bandit problem where each data is characterized by a specific context. We
develop a distributed online learning algorithm for which we can prove
sublinear regret. Compared to prior work in distributed online data mining, our
work is the first to provide analytic regret results characterizing the
performance of the proposed algorithm
- …