475 research outputs found
Generalizing Consistency and other Constraint Properties to Quantified Constraints
Quantified constraints and Quantified Boolean Formulae are typically much
more difficult to reason with than classical constraints, because quantifier
alternation makes the usual notion of solution inappropriate. As a consequence,
basic properties of Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP), such as consistency
or substitutability, are not completely understood in the quantified case.
These properties are important because they are the basis of most of the
reasoning methods used to solve classical (existentially quantified)
constraints, and one would like to benefit from similar reasoning methods in
the resolution of quantified constraints. In this paper, we show that most of
the properties that are used by solvers for CSP can be generalized to
quantified CSP. This requires a re-thinking of a number of basic concepts; in
particular, we propose a notion of outcome that generalizes the classical
notion of solution and on which all definitions are based. We propose a
systematic study of the relations which hold between these properties, as well
as complexity results regarding the decision of these properties. Finally, and
since these problems are typically intractable, we generalize the approach used
in CSP and propose weaker, easier to check notions based on locality, which
allow to detect these properties incompletely but in polynomial time
Querying the Guarded Fragment
Evaluating a Boolean conjunctive query Q against a guarded first-order theory
F is equivalent to checking whether "F and not Q" is unsatisfiable. This
problem is relevant to the areas of database theory and description logic.
Since Q may not be guarded, well known results about the decidability,
complexity, and finite-model property of the guarded fragment do not obviously
carry over to conjunctive query answering over guarded theories, and had been
left open in general. By investigating finite guarded bisimilar covers of
hypergraphs and relational structures, and by substantially generalising
Rosati's finite chase, we prove for guarded theories F and (unions of)
conjunctive queries Q that (i) Q is true in each model of F iff Q is true in
each finite model of F and (ii) determining whether F implies Q is
2EXPTIME-complete. We further show the following results: (iii) the existence
of polynomial-size conformal covers of arbitrary hypergraphs; (iv) a new proof
of the finite model property of the clique-guarded fragment; (v) the small
model property of the guarded fragment with optimal bounds; (vi) a
polynomial-time solution to the canonisation problem modulo guarded
bisimulation, which yields (vii) a capturing result for guarded bisimulation
invariant PTIME.Comment: This is an improved and extended version of the paper of the same
title presented at LICS 201
Symmetries in Modal Logics
We generalize the notion of symmetries of propositional formulas in
conjunctive normal form to modal formulas. Our framework uses the coinductive
models and, hence, the results apply to a wide class of modal logics including,
for example, hybrid logics. Our main result shows that the symmetries of a
modal formula preserve entailment.Comment: In Proceedings LSFA 2012, arXiv:1303.713
Symmetry and complexity in propositional reasoning
We establish computational complexity results for a number of simple problem formulations connecting group action and prepositional formulas. The results are discussed
in the context of complexity results arising from established work in the area of automated reasoning techniques which exploit symmetry
New developments in the theory of Groebner bases and applications to formal verification
We present foundational work on standard bases over rings and on Boolean
Groebner bases in the framework of Boolean functions. The research was
motivated by our collaboration with electrical engineers and computer
scientists on problems arising from formal verification of digital circuits. In
fact, algebraic modelling of formal verification problems is developed on the
word-level as well as on the bit-level. The word-level model leads to Groebner
basis in the polynomial ring over Z/2n while the bit-level model leads to
Boolean Groebner bases. In addition to the theoretical foundations of both
approaches, the algorithms have been implemented. Using these implementations
we show that special data structures and the exploitation of symmetries make
Groebner bases competitive to state-of-the-art tools from formal verification
but having the advantage of being systematic and more flexible.Comment: 44 pages, 8 figures, submitted to the Special Issue of the Journal of
Pure and Applied Algebr
Generalizing Boolean Satisfiability II: Theory
This is the second of three planned papers describing ZAP, a satisfiability
engine that substantially generalizes existing tools while retaining the
performance characteristics of modern high performance solvers. The fundamental
idea underlying ZAP is that many problems passed to such engines contain rich
internal structure that is obscured by the Boolean representation used; our
goal is to define a representation in which this structure is apparent and can
easily be exploited to improve computational performance. This paper presents
the theoretical basis for the ideas underlying ZAP, arguing that existing ideas
in this area exploit a single, recurring structure in that multiple database
axioms can be obtained by operating on a single axiom using a subgroup of the
group of permutations on the literals in the problem. We argue that the group
structure precisely captures the general structure at which earlier approaches
hinted, and give numerous examples of its use. We go on to extend the
Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland inference procedure to this broader setting, and
show that earlier computational improvements are either subsumed or left intact
by the new method. The third paper in this series discusses ZAPs implementation
and presents experimental performance results
- …