The BURCHAK corpus: a Challenge Data Set for Interactive Learning of Visually Grounded Word Meanings

We motivate and describe a new freely available human-human dialogue dataset for interactive learning of visually grounded word meanings through ostensive definition by a tutor to a learner. The data has been collected using a novel, character-by-character variant of the DiET chat tool (Healey et al., 2003; Mills and Healey, submitted) with a novel task, where a Learner needs to learn invented visual attribute words (such as " burchak " for square) from a tutor. As such, the text-based interactions closely resemble face-to-face conversation and thus contain many of the linguistic phenomena encountered in natural, spontaneous dialogue. These include self-and other-correction, mid-sentence continuations, interruptions, overlaps, fillers, and hedges. We also present a generic n-gram framework for building user (i.e. tutor) simulations from this type of incremental data, which is freely available to researchers. We show that the simulations produce outputs that are similar to the original data (e.g. 78% turn match similarity). Finally, we train and evaluate a Reinforcement Learning dialogue control agent for learning visually grounded word meanings, trained from the BURCHAK corpus. The learned policy shows comparable performance to a rule-based system built previously.Comment: 10 pages, THE 6TH WORKSHOP ON VISION AND LANGUAGE (VL'17

Hybrid approach to user intention modeling for dialog simulation

This paper proposes a novel user intention si-mulation method which is a data-driven ap-proach but able to integrate diverse user dis-course knowledge together to simulate various type of users. In Markov logic framework, lo-gistic regression based data-driven user inten-tion modeling is introduced, and human dialog knowledge are designed into two layers such as domain and discourse knowledge, then it is integrated with the data-driven model in gen-eration time. Cooperative, corrective and self-directing discourse knowledge are designed and integrated to mimic such type of users. Experiments were carried out to investigate the patterns of simulated users, and it turned out that our approach was successful to gener-ate user intention patterns which are not only unseen in the training corpus and but also per-sonalized in the designed direction.

Toward automated evaluation of interactive segmentation

We previously described a system for evaluating interactive segmentation by means of user experiments (McGuinness and O’Connor, 2010). This method, while effective, is time-consuming and labor-intensive. This paper aims to make evaluation more practicable by investigating if it is feasible to automate user interactions. To this end, we propose a general algorithm for driving the segmentation that uses the ground truth and current segmentation error to automatically simulate user interactions. We investigate four strategies for selecting which pixels will form the next interaction. The first of these is a simple, deterministic strategy; the remaining three strategies are probabilistic, and focus on more realistically approximating a real user. We evaluate four interactive segmentation algorithms using these strategies, and compare the results with our previous user experiment-based evaluation. The results show that automated evaluation is both feasible and useful

Data-driven user simulation for automated evaluation of spoken dialog systems

This paper proposes a novel integrated dialog simulation technique for evaluating spoken dialog systems. A data-driven user simulation technique for simulating user intention and utterance is introduced. A novel user intention modeling and generating method is proposed that uses a linear-chain conditional random field, and a two-phase data-driven domain-specific user utterance Simulation method and a linguistic knowledge-based ASR channel simulation method are also presented. Evaluation metrics are introduced to measure the quality of user simulation at intention and utterance. Experiments using these techniques were carried out to evaluate the performance and behavior of dialog systems designed for car navigation dialogs and a building guide robot, and it turned out that Our approach was easy to set tip and showed similar tendencies to real human users. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.X112540sciescopu

User Simulation for Spoken Dialog System Development

A user simulation is a computer program which simulates human user behaviors. Recently, user simulations have been widely used in two spoken dialog system development tasks. One is to generate large simulated corpora for applying machine learning to learn new dialog strategies, and the other is to replace human users to test dialog system performance. Although previous studies have shown successful examples of applying user simulations in both tasks, it is not clear what type of user simulation is most appropriate for a specific task because few studies compare different user simulations in the same experimental setting. In this research, we investigate how to construct user simulations in a specific task for spoken dialog system development. Since most current user simulations generate user actions based on probabilistic models, we identify two main factors in constructing such user simulations: the choice of user simulation model and the approach to set up user action probabilities. We build different user simulation models which differ in their efforts in simulating realistic user behaviors and exploring more user actions. We also investigate different manual and trained approaches to set up user action probabilities. We introduce both task-dependent and task-independent measures to compare these simulations. We show that a simulated user which mimics realistic user behaviors is not always necessary for the dialog strategy learning task. For the dialog system testing task, a user simulation which simulates user behaviors in a statistical way can generate both objective and subjective measures of dialog system performance similar to human users. Our research examines the strengths and weaknesses of user simulations in spoken dialog system development. Although our results are constrained to our task domain and the resources available, we provide a general framework for comparing user simulations in a task-dependent context. In addition, we summarize and validate a set of evaluation measures that can be used in comparing different simulated users as well as simulated versus human users